Cited by 119Populism, Right-Wing MovementsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitics and Society in Latin America

Demographic polarization and the rise of the far right: Brazil’s 2018 presidential election

Open access
Layton, Matthew L., Smith, Amy Erica, Moseley, Mason W., Cohen, Mollie J.·2021·Research & Politics

Abstract

Does the recent electoral success of far-right populists represent a mere rejection of the political and economic status quo, or has it revealed deeper cultural divides? Historically, demographic cleavages have been poor predictors of vote choice and partisanship in Latin America. However, during Brazil’s 2018 presidential election campaign, right-wing candidate Jair Bolsonaro fomented conflict across lines of gender, race, and religion. We argue that his candidacy activated latent, previously unexploited grievances in the electorate. Using survey data from an original five-wave online panel conducted between July 2018 and January 2019, we examine the effect of demographic cleavages on presidential vote choice. In stark contrast to prior elections, we find clear evidence of demographic divides in 2018, partially mediated by issue positions. Bolsonaro’s campaign and subsequent election thus appear to have created new identity-based alignments in Brazil’s electorate. Our findings shed further light on the global resurgence of the far right, suggesting that far-right candidates can attract new bases of support through demographic polarization, exploiting differences in values and issue preferences by gender, race, ethnicity, and religion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053168021990204

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from the BES model provide a more robust test of social sorting, and the significant effect of social sorting is in line with the increased demographic polarization found by Layton et al. (2021).

    “Results from the BES model provide a more robust test of this particular variable, and the significant effect of social sorting is in line with the increased demographic polarization found by Layton et al. (2021).”

    From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Layton et al. (2021)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Layton, M. L., Smith, A. E., Moseley, M. W., & Cohen, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Layton, Matthew L.
Venue
Research & Politics
Published
2021-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2053-1680 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127453657
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6
FWCI
42.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research & Politics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
Keywords
far right, far-right populism, 2018 Brazilian presidential election, Jair Bolsonaro, vote choice, gender, race and ethnicity, issue positions, political cleavages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review