Cited by 3Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsReproductive Health and ContraceptionHormonal and reproductive studies

Consensus-led recommendations supporting choice and personalisation of hormone replacement therapy in menopause care

Open access
Briggs, Paula, Barber, Katie, Cooke, Kathie, Hillard, Tim, Mansour, Diana, Panay, Nick, Pearson, Keith, Tanna, Nuttan +1 more·2022·Post Reproductive Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Inequity of access and choice to different hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products across the UK has been suggested (Hillman, 2020). While, the cause is not entirely understood, potential contributors include conflicting national guidance, economic deprivation and a local formulary approach. With a diverse and growing population of women reaching and living well beyond the menopause, the impact of this inequity is becoming more pronounced, and challenges the goal of providing personalised care. The study objective is to establish a consensus that supports a greater equity of access and choice of HRT and provision of individualised care. STUDY DESIGN: scale questionnaire, sent to UK HCPs, was used to assess agreement, with a consensus threshold set at 75%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 150 HCP responses between June and September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 137 responses were received. Analysis identified 37/40 statements attaining very high agreement (≥ 90%) and 3/40 statements attaining high agreement (< 90% and ≥75%). Nine recommendations were developed with the intent to inform potential improvements to menopause care in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: The high levels of agreement displayed suggest a desire to change the way menopause care is delivered in the UK. Implementation of the suggested recommendations has the potential to improve equity of access to licensed treatment options, compliant with the NICE recommendation for personalisation of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20533691221084827

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the UK, access and availability to all treatment options was recognized as an important factor for shared decision-making which can improve medication adherence.

    “In the UK, it was recognized that access and availability to all treatment options was an important factor for shared decision-making which can improve medication adherence.313”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briggs, P., Barber, K., Cooke, K., Hillard, T., Mansour, D., Panay, N., Pearson, K., Tanna, N., & Wokoma, T.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool Women's Hospital (GB)
  • General Practitioner with Extended Role in Menopause and Gynaecology, Woodlands Medical Centre, Oxford, UK
  • Consultant Nurse, Gynaecology, Liverpool, UK
  • Consultant Gynaecologist, University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, UK
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Consultant Gynaecologist, London, UK
  • Head of Medicines Optimisation, NHS Heywood Middleton and Rochdale Clinical Commissioning Group, Manchester, UK
  • Pharmacist Consultant, Womens Services, London, UK
  • Consultant Community Sexual & Reproductive Health, City Healthcare Partnership, Hull, UK
Corresponding author
Briggs, Paula
Venue
Post Reproductive Health
Published
2022-04-20
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
71-78
ISSN
  • 2053-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-3691
  • 2053-3705
OpenAlex
W4224229984
Cited by
3
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Post Reproductive Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Theramex HQ UK Ltd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
hormone replacement therapy, menopause care, individualized care, equitable access, consensus recommendations, healthcare professionals' views, NICE guidelines, economic hardship
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Menopause, Surveys and Questionnaires, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review