Cited by 11Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The curious case of blockchain in rural China: Unravelling power, profit, and surveillance

Open access
Hung, Alvin Hoi-Chun·2024·Big Data & Society

Abstract

Blockchain originated from the aspiration for decentralization, and in Western countries, its association with freedom from governmental and corporate dominance remains unwavering. However, in China–where blockchain has taken an intriguing foothold–the socio-technical imaginaries of blockchain diverge significantly. As China rises in blockchain development, critical literature examining its ventures is notably lacking. This article analyses state-led initiatives and corporate endeavours related to blockchain deployment in rural China. While blockchain's roots lie in libertarian ideals, within China, it serves as a ‘state techno-solutionist’ tool, empowering authoritarian capitalism for enhanced state control and corporate profit through data exploitation. Although the application of blockchain in agricultural tracing and finance is heralded as a blessing to elevate smallholder farmers from poverty and enhance agricultural practices, the reality contrasts sharply. Instead of empowering farmers, the technology exacerbates power imbalances, embedding them in a system marked by extensive data harvesting and surveillance. Such integration entangles these farmers subsisting on China's economic fringes within broader national and global capitalist financial frameworks, rendering them more susceptible to exploitation and manipulation. Moreover, blockchain in rural China epitomizes authoritarian capitalism, where capitalists aligning closely with state agendas. Blockchain's transparency, traceability, and tamper-resistant features, instead of diminishing government interference, are harnessed by capitalists to amplify the social credit system, strengthening the data dominance of platform companies and supporting state surveillance. Therefore, blockchain emerges as a threat to rural China's ways of life–all driven by the pursuit of corporate profit and the government's quest to reclaim national greatness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20539517241259674

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1111/dech.12027 · DOI
  2. Andrejevic M, 2014, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673
  3. 10.1007/978-3-319-76014-8_8 · DOI
  4. 10.5539/jas.v12n9p192 · DOI
  5. Campbell-Verduyn M, 2023, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 239965442311628
  6. 10.1093/oso/9780198823940.003.0003 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100292 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0163443718772147 · DOI
  9. 10.16997/book29.d · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.011 · DOI
  11. Gan L, 2020, 当代经济研究 [Contemporary Economic Research], 294, 33
  12. Gladstein A, 2022, Check Your Financial Privilege.
  13. Gray B, 2018, Digital Farmer Profiles: Reimagining Smallholder Agriculture
  14. 10.1177/1024529420965524 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13563467.2018.1562437 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727094 · DOI
  17. 10.1353/jod.2022.0019 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103873 · DOI
  19. 10.3389/fbloc.2020.00022 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cie.2020.107079 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/720144 · DOI
  22. Huang Z, 2012, 开放时代 [Open Times], 3, 88
  23. 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 · DOI
  24. Jiang G, 2022, 江⻄财经大学学报 [Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics], 1, 111
  25. 10.3390/land11111980 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/2053951720985249 · DOI
  27. 10.3389/fsufs.2022.903230 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/08854300.2017.1332262 · DOI
  29. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.727647 · DOI
  30. 10.3389/fbloc.2021.720347 · DOI
  31. 10.3390/su14138044 · DOI
  32. 10.1146/annurev-resource-111220-014147 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/978-3-031-33944-8_4 · DOI
  34. Lan Y, 2020, 链能:区块链与产业变革、治理现代化 [Chain Power: Blockchain and Industrial Transformation, Modernizing Governance]
  35. Lei M, 2022, Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 11, 2262
  36. 10.1177/0097700409360745 · DOI
  37. Liang J, 2015, 宏观经济研究 [Macroeconomics], 3, 58
  38. Lin LY-H, 2023, The China Quarterly, 1
  39. 10.2478/popets-2021-0050 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2068070 · DOI
  41. 10.1525/as.2021.1428111 · DOI
  42. Liu H, 2014, 经济导刊 [Economic Herald], 9, 45
  43. 10.3390/su14073905 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/02681102.2021.1925619 · DOI
  45. Patel N, 2021, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 4286
  46. 10.1111/1750-3841.15477 · DOI
  47. Qingyuan Daily and Wanting, 2020, Information Engineering & Technology, 6, 24
  48. Quintais JP, 2019, Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, 2, 86
  49. 10.1177/20539517231159629 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/20539517231205479 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/s23146290 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/00472336.2022.2093774 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106895 · DOI
  54. Swa M, 2015, Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy
  55. 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00377.x · DOI
  56. 10.1080/13563467.2022.2101633 · DOI
  57. Tong Z, 2010, 中国合作经济评论 [Chinese Cooperative Economy Review], 4, 60
  58. 10.1108/17561371011044261 · DOI
  59. Wang F, 2020, Rural Economy and Science-Technology [农村经济与科技], 31, 71
  60. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121742 · DOI
  61. Wang X, 2020, Blockchain Chicken Farm: And Other Stories of Tech in China’s Countryside
  62. Whitehouse-Levine M, 2020, Self-Hosted Wallets and the Future of Free Societies: A Guide for Policymakers
  63. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199654925.013.006 · DOI
  64. Xi J (2022) 坚持把解决好“三农”问题作为全党工作重中之重 举全党全社会之力推动乡村振兴 [Upholding the resolution of the ‘three rural’ issues as the central focus of party work: mobilizing the entire party and society for rural revitalization]. 求是 [Qiushi] 7(1): 4–17.
  65. 10.3389/fbloc.2020.00007 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.aiia.2020.08.002 · DOI
  67. 10.1007/978-3-031-13276-6_13 · DOI
  68. Zhang R, 2018, 中国农村经济 [Chinese Rural Economy], 5, 84
  69. Zhen L, 2021, International Journal of Communication, 15, 886
  70. 10.4000/chinaperspectives.15869 · DOI
  71. Zhong D, 2008, 清华大学学报:哲学社会科学版 [Journal of Tsinghua University, Philosophy and Social Sciences], 8, 146

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Hung, A. H.-C.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hung, Alvin Hoi-Chun
Venue
Big Data & Society
Published
2024-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
ISSN
2053-9517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399293905
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Keywords
blockchain, rural China, authoritarian capitalism, government surveillance, data exploitation, smallholder farmers, social credit system, platform companies, power imbalance, data sovereignty, decentralization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The curious case of blockchain in rural China: Unravelling power, profit, and surveillance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/20539517241259674
The paper
Hung, A. H.-C. (2024). The curious case of blockchain in rural China: Unravelling power, profit, and surveillance. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241259674