The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory
Open accessAbstract
In this essay, we reconstruct a keyword for communication—affordance. Affordance, adopted from ecological psychology, is now widely used in technology studies, yet the term lacks a clear definition. This is especially problematic for scholars grappling with how to theorize the relationship between technology and sociality for complex socio-technical systems such as machine-learning algorithms, pervasive computing, the Internet of Things, and other such “smart” innovations. Within technology studies, emerging theories of materiality, affect, and mediation all necessitate a richer and more nuanced definition for affordance than the field currently uses. To solve this, we develop the concept of imagined affordance. Imagined affordances emerge between users’ perceptions, attitudes, and expectations; between the materiality and functionality of technologies; and between the intentions and perceptions of designers. We use imagined affordance to evoke the importance of imagination in affordances—expectations for technology that are not fully realized in conscious, rational knowledge. We also use imagined affordance to distinguish our process-oriented, socio-technical definition of affordance from the “imagined” consensus of the field around a flimsier use of the term. We also use it in order to better capture the importance of mediation, materiality, and affect. We suggest that imagined affordance helps to theorize the duality of materiality and communication technology: namely, that people shape their media environments, perceive them, and have agency within them because of imagined affordances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,887
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change.
Lynch, M., Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074370 · Cited by 3,540
The Perception of the Environment
Ingold, T. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203466025 · Cited by 3,356
The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill
Ingold, T. (2021) · Cited by 3,241
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 1×
“In this way, imagined affordance shares a theoretical affinity with the “politics of platforms” (Gillespie, 2010).”
BackgroundAffordance, conventions, and design
Norman, D. A. (1999) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/301153.301168 · Cited by 2,040
Technologies, texts and affordances.
Hutchby, I. (2001) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/s0038038501000219 · Cited by 2,012
Cited by
The Affordances of Social Media Platforms
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018) · The SAGE Handbook of Social Media · doi:10.4135/9781473984066.n14 · Cited by 1,083
Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/2050157920952120 · Cited by 500
Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media
Rogers, R. (2020) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323120922066 · Cited by 441
Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse
Costa, E. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818756290 · Cited by 328
Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R. G., & McGregor, S. C. (2018) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1334727 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagy, P., & Neff, G.
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173037902
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 147.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2056305115603385
- The paper
- Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.