Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Locating Power in Platformization: Music Streaming Playlists and Curatorial Power

Prey, Robert·2020·Social Media + Society

Abstract

Where does the “power” of platformization reside? As is widely recognized, platforms are matchmakers which interface between different markets or “sides.” This article analyzes platform power dynamics through three of the most important markets that Spotify—the leading audio streaming platform—is embedded within: the music market; the advertising market; and the finance market. It does so through the lens of the playlist. Playlists can be seen as a central example of how platforms like Spotify employ curation or “curatorial power” to mediate markets in the attempt to advance their own interests. At the same time, playlists are an outcome of the conflicting pressures and tensions between these markets. As such, they provide a lens through which to view broader structural dynamics within the platform economy. As this case study of Spotify demonstrates, platform “power” is an always unstable and shifting outcome of the ongoing attempt to coordinate between various markets and actors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2056305120933291

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Aguiar L., 2018, Platforms, promotion, and product discovery: Evidence from Spotify playlists
  2. 10.1177/2056305119880006 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.869615 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/03007760500159088 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/016344379401600303 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/17530350.2019.1708780 · DOI
  7. 10.7551/mitpress/10932.001.0001 · DOI
  8. Evans D. S., 2016, Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms
  9. 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1792146 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/03007766.2015.1021174 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/03007766.2015.1120101 · DOI
  12. Latour B., 2005, Reassembling the Social: An introduction of actor-network-theory, 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1525/ctx.2007.6.3.59 · DOI
  14. Meier L. M., 2017, Popular music as promotion: Music and branding in the digital age
  15. 10.1525/9780520962934 · DOI
  16. Napoli P., Caplan R. (2017). Why media companies insist they’re not media companies, why they’re wrong, and why it matters. First Monday, 22(5). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7051 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1461444818769694 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Prey R. (2015). “Now Playing. You”: Big Data and the Production of Music Streaming space [Doctoral dissertation]. Communication, Art & Technology, School of Communication, Simon Fraser University.
  19. 10.1007/978-3-658-21220-9_2 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1761859 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1461444813481195 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Srnicek N., 2017, Platform capitalism
  23. Universal Music. (2018, August 2) Universal Music group launches “Peaceful Music” playlist with Apple Music. http://www.umusic.ca/press-releases/universal-music-group-launches-peaceful-music-playlist-apple-music/
  24. 10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1177/1527476417741200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Metadata

Authors
Prey, R.
Affiliations
University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2020-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
ISSN
2056-3051
Cited by
126
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review