Imagined Audiences, Emotions, and Feedback Expectations in Social Media Photo Sharing
Open accessAbstract
The present research explores the effects of imagined audiences, emotions, and feedback expectations on social media photo sharing. We focus on the audience-oriented approach to sharing and on how discrepancies between expected and received feedback might shape photo sharing behaviors. Twenty-four participants were interviewed using scenario-based semi-structured interview method. The participants were asked to develop an imagined story about two fictional individuals who decided to share a photo on their social media. The story was guided by questions about the characters’ motivations and incentives to post and explored three alternative scenarios representing the reception of usual feedback, better than usual feedback, and the absence of expected feedback, respectively. The results indicate that individuals often adopt their audience’s perspective when choosing a photo to post, and consider whether the chosen image would evoke sufficient interest to induce feedback. The participants believed that emotional photos engaged their audience and motivated the viewers to provide feedback. Furthermore, the study identified and analyzed the concept of feedback expectations. When received feedback exceeded the expectations, individuals experienced happiness. However, the replication of successful content was considered appropriate only if accompanied by a suitable caption and posted after a period of time. When received feedback failed to meet their expectations, individuals felt disconnected from their audiences and experienced disappointment. They employed rationalization and feedback dismissal as coping mechanisms and displayed two common behavioral responses to unsuccessful feedback; they attempted to repost the photo avoiding previous mistakes, and they changed the style of content they posted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On Instagram and Snapchat, adolescents observe the self-presentation practices of not only their close friends but also more distant peers and present themselves to these differing subaudiences accordingly.
“However, on Instagram and Snapchat, adolescents observe the self-presentation practices of not only their close friends but also more distant peers and present themselves to these differing subaudiences accordingly (Hollenbaugh, 2021; Stsiampkouskaya et al., 2021).”
From The Impact of Social Norms on Adolescents’ Self-Presentation Practices on Social Media (2024) · cites this paper as Stsiampkouskaya et al., 2021
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on facebook
Mehdizadeh, S. (2010) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257 · Cited by 1,064 · see citing works
Self-presentation and gender on MySpace
Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011 · Cited by 704 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In other words, users, who post for specific audiences, also expect to receive feedback from them, which is often represented in a form of likes (Chua & Chang, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluential<i>Knock, Knock</i> . Who's There? The Imagined Audience
Litt, E. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp
Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817707349 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Self-disclosure and social media: Motivations, mechanisms and psychological well-being
Luo, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.019 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself
Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.032 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Yau, J. C., & Reich, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12376 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Can You Guess Who I Am? Real, Ideal, and False Self-Presentation on Facebook Among Emerging Adults
Michikyan, M., Dennis, J., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2015) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696814532442 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Selfies and personality: Who posts self-portrait photographs?
Sorokowska, A., Oleszkiewicz, A., Frackowiak, T., Pisanski, K., Chmiel, A., & Sorokowski, P. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.037 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Social Norms on Adolescents’ Self-Presentation Practices on Social Media
Zillich, A. F., & Wunderlich, A. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241299829 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Similarly, based on scenario-based semi-structured inter-views with Instagram users in the United Kingdom, Stsiampkouskaya et al. (2021) showed that selecting and sharing photos on Instagram was largely driven by users’ desire to present the best aspects of their lives.”
Influential
- Authors
- Stsiampkouskaya, K., Joinson, A., Piwek, L., & Stevens, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stsiampkouskaya, Kseniya
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3195040600
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Bath
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- imagined audience, emotional content, audience feedback, coping strategies, rationalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review