Cited by 53Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Marketing and Social Media

Imagined Audiences, Emotions, and Feedback Expectations in Social Media Photo Sharing

Open access
Stsiampkouskaya, Kseniya, Joinson, Adam, Piwek, Lukasz, Stevens, Lorna·2021·Social Media + Society

Abstract

The present research explores the effects of imagined audiences, emotions, and feedback expectations on social media photo sharing. We focus on the audience-oriented approach to sharing and on how discrepancies between expected and received feedback might shape photo sharing behaviors. Twenty-four participants were interviewed using scenario-based semi-structured interview method. The participants were asked to develop an imagined story about two fictional individuals who decided to share a photo on their social media. The story was guided by questions about the characters’ motivations and incentives to post and explored three alternative scenarios representing the reception of usual feedback, better than usual feedback, and the absence of expected feedback, respectively. The results indicate that individuals often adopt their audience’s perspective when choosing a photo to post, and consider whether the chosen image would evoke sufficient interest to induce feedback. The participants believed that emotional photos engaged their audience and motivated the viewers to provide feedback. Furthermore, the study identified and analyzed the concept of feedback expectations. When received feedback exceeded the expectations, individuals experienced happiness. However, the replication of successful content was considered appropriate only if accompanied by a suitable caption and posted after a period of time. When received feedback failed to meet their expectations, individuals felt disconnected from their audiences and experienced disappointment. They employed rationalization and feedback dismissal as coping mechanisms and displayed two common behavioral responses to unsuccessful feedback; they attempted to repost the photo avoiding previous mistakes, and they changed the style of content they posted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20563051211035692

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On Instagram and Snapchat, adolescents observe the self-presentation practices of not only their close friends but also more distant peers and present themselves to these differing subaudiences accordingly.

    “However, on Instagram and Snapchat, adolescents observe the self-presentation practices of not only their close friends but also more distant peers and present themselves to these differing subaudiences accordingly (Hollenbaugh, 2021; Stsiampkouskaya et al., 2021).”

    From The Impact of Social Norms on Adolescents’ Self-Presentation Practices on Social Media (2024) · cites this paper as Stsiampkouskaya et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stsiampkouskaya, K., Joinson, A., Piwek, L., & Stevens, L.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Stsiampkouskaya, Kseniya
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2021-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195040600
Cited by
53
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Bath
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
imagined audience, emotional content, audience feedback, coping strategies, rationalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review