Cited by 33Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Mental Health Integration: Normalizing Team Care

Open access
Reiss-Brennan, Brenda·2014·Journal of Primary Care & Community Health

Abstract

This article examines the impact of integrating mental health into primary health care. Mental Health Integration (MHI) within Intermountain Healthcare has changed the culture of primary health care by standardizing a team-based care process that includes mental health as a normal part of the routine medical encounter. Using a quantitative statistical analysis of qualitative reports (mixed methods study), the study reports on health outcomes associated with MHI for patients and staff. Researchers interviewed 59 patients and 50 staff to evaluate the impact of MHI on depression care. Patients receiving MHI reported an improved relationship with caregivers ( P < .001) and improved overall functioning in their lives ( P < .01). Staff providing care in MHI reported that patients experienced improved access to mental health care, improved overall patient productivity in daily functions ( P < .01), and access to team care ( P < .001). As MHI became routine, patients discussed complementary team interventions more frequently ( P < .0001). Mental health problems rank second in chronic disease today. MHI offers promising results for improving the quality and cost of effective treatment for chronic disease. This research provides guidelines for organizing mental health care, staff productivity, and patient satisfaction, using a team approach to improve outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2150131913508983

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective team-based care and higher quality teamwork are associated with improvements in care access and quality, patient safety, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and costs.

    “Effective team-based care and higher quality teamwork are associated with improvements in care access and quality, patient safety, patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and costs [2, 4–9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reiss-Brennan, B.
Affiliations
Intermountain Healthcare (US)
Corresponding author
Reiss-Brennan, Brenda
Venue
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Published
2013-11-07
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
55-60
ISSN
  • 2150-1319 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-1327
OpenAlex
W2100970062
Cited by
33
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Primary Care & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
mental health integration, primary care, depression care, team-based care, Intermountain Healthcare, caregiver-patient relationship, access to mental health care, labor productivity, patient satisfaction, chronic disease, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Depressive Disorder, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health Services, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Utah, Patient Satisfaction, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review