Cited by 59EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Investigation of the Iranian EFL Learners’ Perceptions Towards the Most Common Writing Problems

Open access
Derakhshan, Ali, Karimian Shirejini, Roghayeh·2020·Sage Open

Abstract

Inasmuch as the fact that writing is a cognitively demanding task and as a step toward overcoming some of the barriers English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners face during writing performance, this study attempted to investigate Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions toward the most common writing difficulties. To this end, 120 Iranian EFL learners from Golestan University, Iran, filled out a reliable and validated questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire and the semi-structured interviews ( N = 24) revealed that most of the participants agreed that for teaching grammar and punctuation, they should be embedded in a context and be integrated with the four skills. They also believed that teachers should use punctuation appropriately in their writings themselves and teach them to students explicitly. Besides, it was believed that through using mnemonics, students can better learn words spelling. The results of the interviews revealed grammar, spelling, punctuation, choice of words, organization, and familiarity with genres and rhetorical structures, negative transfer from Persian to English, and idiomatic expressions and collocations are the other factors that make the writing task difficult. Based on the students’ perceptions, the findings of this study can inform English language teachers to teach grammar, punctuation, and spelling by contextualizing them in an appropriate context, and they offer some practical implications for teachers, learners, material developers, an…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2158244020919523

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Writing quality varies across commenters for reasons including language background, educational access, and writing experience.

    “Writing quality varies across commenters for reasons including language background, educational access, and writing experience [25, 45, 100].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.524 · DOI
  2. Al-Khasawneh F. M., 2013, 3rd International Conference on International Studies (ICIS)
  3. 10.25134/erjee.v5i2.533 · DOI
  4. 10.5539/elt.v7n9p57 · DOI
  5. Amirbakzadeh E., 2020, International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 8, 61
  6. Bahloul M., 2007, Language teacher research in the Middle East, 41
  7. Bani Younes Z., 2015, Asian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 7
  8. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Braine G., 1995, Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy, 113
  10. 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00503-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0889-4906(92)90005-U · DOI
  12. Chau N. M., 2006, The impact of adapting the process-oriented approach on EFL learners’ writing performance: A case study at Ly Tu Trong specialized upper-secondary school
  13. Chen H., 2001, Effect of task type and task condition on EFL writing performance
  14. Cooley L., 1995, Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121
  15. Davari H., 2015, English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges, 13
  16. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-981-15-1983-3 · DOI
  18. Farouq M., 2012, A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 27, 183
  19. 10.3126/jong.v2i0.26605 · DOI
  20. 10.4304/jltr.4.5.1138-1145 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.68 · DOI
  22. Henderson R. H., 1981, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 60, 253
  23. 10.1017/S0261444811000036 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/9781108635547 · DOI
  25. Iranmehr A., 2018, Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 1, 94
  26. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00896 · DOI
  27. 10.5539/ies.v5n2p125 · DOI
  28. James K., 1984, Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies, 99
  29. Johns A., 1995, Academic writing in a second language, 277
  30. Khan I. A., 2011, Educational Research, 2, 1248
  31. 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90006-6 · DOI
  32. 10.17507/jltr.1005.09 · DOI
  33. Lynch B. K., 1996, Language program evaluation: Theory and practice
  34. Mahmoud A., 2005, Asian EFL Journal, 5, 1
  35. 10.4304/tpls.2.12.2500-2507 · DOI
  36. Mwangi S. W., 2017, African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1, 1
  37. Nasser A. N. A., 2016, South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (SAJMS), 3, 191
  38. Nyasimi N. B. (2014). Challenges students face in learning essay writing skills in English language in secondary schools in Manga District, Nyamira County, Kenya [Master’s thesis]. https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/11907
  39. 10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004 · DOI
  40. 10.12785/JTTE/080105 · DOI
  41. Raimes A., 1991, Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics, 238
  42. Tillema M., 2012, LOT dissertation series: Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Derakhshan, A., & Karimian Shirejini, R.
Affiliations
  • Golestan University (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
Corresponding author
Derakhshan, Ali
Venue
Sage Open
Published
2020-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
ISSN
2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3020822510
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
41.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
EFL writing difficulties, learner perceptions, Iranian EFL learners, grammar instruction, punctuation, spelling, negative transfer, word choice, text structure, rhetorical structure, idioms, collocations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review