Masculinity and Violence Interconnectedness: Defining and Reconciling the Gender Paradox Among Men With Cumulative Lifetime Violence Histories
Open accessAbstract
Among men, gender and views about violence contribute to how men, and others, identify and respond to violence and related outcomes. Despite this, little is known about men’s perspectives regarding gender/masculinities and cumulative lifetime violence (CLV) exposure. Using the qualitative method of Interpretative description, the complex relationship between gender and violence for men who have experienced CLV was explored. Interviews with thirty-two men who experienced CLV revealed a complex interrelation between masculinity and violence (MV interconnectedness). This intricate connection is difficult to separate due to persistent normalization and acceptance of violence. Because violence is one way that men live up to pressure to ‘be a man,’ MV interconnectedness positively contributes to men’s sense of self. However, MV interconnectedness also contributes to significant harm. The contradictory nature of MV interconnectedness and the tension that arises when men contemplate the link between gender and violence was labelled ‘the paradox’. As men grapple with the paradox, and the ways that gender and violence have influenced their lives, they are able to move toward disconnecting violence from how they define themselves as men. The paradox is a significant addition to the understanding of how men may reject the narrative that masculinity and violence are interconnected. MV Interconnectedness demonstrates that the link between masculinity and violence perpetration is not straightforward. Normalization and acceptance of violence calls for efforts to counteract the messages and pressures boys and men receive that influence their behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men who strongly internalize traditional masculine norms are more likely to justify violence, including psychological aggression, as an appropriate response to masculinity threats.
“Empirical evidence shows that men who strongly internalize traditional masculine norms are more likely to justify violence, including psychological aggression, as an appropriate response to masculinity threats (Moore et al., 2010; O’Donnell et al., 2024).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as O’Donnell et al., 2024
Fragile masculinity may represent a particularly salient contributor to men's psychological IPV perpetration.
“Given that boys and men are socialized across family, peer, institutional, and sociocultural contexts to equate masculinity with dominance and legitimized aggression (Connell & Messerschmidt, 2005; O’Donnell et al., 2024), fragile masculinity may represent a particularly salient contributor to men’s psychological IPV perpetration.”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as O’Donnell et al., 2024
Cites
Man enough? Masculine discrepancy stress and intimate partner violence
Reidy, D. E., Berke, D. S., Gentile, B., & Zeichner, A. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.021 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Peralta, R. L., Tuttle, L. A., & Steele, J. L. (2010) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801210363539 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Men’s Experience of Psychological Abuse: Conceptualization and Measurement Issues
McHugh, M. C., Rakowski, S., & Swiderski, C. (2013) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0274-3 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse: Becoming Gender-Sensitive and Trauma-Informed
Elkins, J., Crawford, K., & Briggs, H. E. (2017) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/21301 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Demirtaş, E. T., & Zurnacı, B. (2026) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-026-03422-4
“Internal consistency reliability analyses across four distinct and diverse samples generally indicated that the MMEA-TR short-form subscales yielded reliability coefficients above the commonly accepted threshold of .70 (Nunnally, 1978).”
- Authors
- O’Donnell, S., Taylor, P., Vincent, C. D., Scott-Storey, K., Wuest, J., & Malcolm, J.
- Affiliations
- University of New Brunswick (CA)
- Corresponding author
- O’Donnell, Sue
- Venue
- Sage Open
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401274744
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (136901)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- masculinity, gender-based violence, gender paradox, normalization of violence, male identity, violence perpetration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review