Cited by 160Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceGender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Man enough? Masculine discrepancy stress and intimate partner violence

Open access
Reidy, Dennis E., Berke, Danielle S., Gentile, Brittany, Zeichner, Amos·2014·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

Research on gender roles suggests that men who strongly adhere to traditional masculine gender norms are at increased risk for the perpetration of violent and abusive acts toward their female intimate partners. Yet, gender norms alone fail to provide a comprehensive explanation of the multifaceted construct of intimate partner violence (IPV) and there is theoretical reason to suspect that men who fail to conform to masculine roles may equally be at risk for IPV. In the present study, we assessed effect of masculine discrepancy stress, a form of distress arising from perceived failure to conform to socially-prescribed masculine gender role norms, on IPV. Six-hundred men completed online surveys assessing their experience of discrepancy stress, masculine gender role norms, and history of IPV. Results indicated that masculine discrepancy stress significantly predicted men's historical perpetration of IPV independent of other masculinity related variables. Findings are discussed in terms of potential distress engendered by masculine socialization as well as putative implications of gender role discrepancy stress for understanding and intervening in partner violence perpetrated by men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.021

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When masculinity feels tenuous, men may resort to psychologically aggressive behaviors to reassert power or control.

    “When masculinity feels tenuous, men may resort to psychologically aggressive behaviors to reassert power or control (Reidy et al., 2014; Türkoğlu, 2013; Vandello & Bosson, 2013).”

    From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Reidy et al., 2014

    The Results (§4.3; page unavailable) report that masculine discrepancy stress predicted psychological aggression against an intimate partner. The Discussion (§4; page unavailable) suggests that men distressed by perceived threats to their masculinity may respond to bolster their masculine status. It does not establish that psychological aggression was used to reassert power or control, and perceived discrepancy without distress did not predict aggression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reidy, D. E., Berke, D. S., Gentile, B., & Zeichner, A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Reidy, Dennis E.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
68
Pages
160-164
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085932262
Cited by
160
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, masculinity, gender socialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review