Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imperialism and Primitive Accumulation: Notes on the New Scramble for Africa

Moyo, Sam, Yeros, Paris, Jha, Praveen·2012·Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES

Abstract

This article recuperates the links between imperialism and primitive accumulation, arguing that the two are inherently connected. It undertakes a review of the literature to show that the links are deeper than is often recognized, as in the work of David Harvey. It also maps the stages of imperialism, their logics and characteristics, from the initial expansion of merchant capitalism, through monopoly capitalism and its financialization, which is now leading a ‘new scramble’. The article shows how the various scrambles for Africa have evolved, including past and present land grabs, as well as the nature of resistance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/227797601200100203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The imperialist regulation of the international division of labor enters extractivist literature only obliquely through discussions of 'globalization' or 'accumulation by dispossession' that erase the structured centre-periphery contradiction in historical capitalism.

    “The imperialist regulation of the international division of labor only enters obliquely, through a discussion of “globalization” (Gudynas, 2018, p. 66) or “accumulation by dispossession” (Lander, 2013, pp. 92-94), drawing on David Harvey to erase “the structured nature of the centre-periphery contradiction in historical capitalism” (Moyo et al., 2012, p. 88).”

    From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Moyo et al., 2012, p. 88

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1017/S0022278X00022801 · DOI
  2. Amin Samir, 1976, Unequal development
  3. Amin Samir, 2003, Obsolescent capitalism: Contemporary capitalism and global disorder
  4. Amin Samir, 2011, Reclaiming the nation: The return of the national question in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 325
  5. Arrighi Giovanni, 2003, New Left Review, 2, 5
  6. Arrighi Giovanni, 2007, Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the twenty-first century
  7. Arrighi Giovanni, Silver Beverly J. (1999). Introduction: Chaos and governance in the modern world system, (pp. 1–36). Minneapolis, MN & London: University of Minnesota Press.
  8. Baran Paul, 1966, Monopoly capital
  9. Cotula Lorenzo, 2009, Land grab or development opportunity?
  10. Cox Robert, 1987, Production, power and world order
  11. Depelchin Jacques, 2004, Silences in African history: Between the syndromes of discovery and abolition
  12. dos Santos Theotonio, 1978, Imperialismo y Dependencia
  13. 10.14452/MR-061-09-2010-02_1 · DOI
  14. 10.14452/MR-062-05-2010-09_1 · DOI
  15. 10.14452/MR-063-07-2011-11_1 · DOI
  16. 10.14452/MR-063-09-2012-02_1 · DOI
  17. 10.14452/MR-063-02-2011-06_1 · DOI
  18. 10.14452/MR-063-06-2011-10_1 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hobsbawm Eric J., 1994, The age of empire: 1875–1914
  21. Lenin V.I., 1996, Imperialism: The highest stage of capitalism
  22. Litwak Robert S., 1984, Détente and the Nixon doctrine
  23. Luxemburg Rosa, 1951, The accumulation of capital
  24. Mandaza Ibbo, 1980, UTAFITI, 5, 129
  25. Marini Ruy Mauro, 1970, Sub-desarrollo y Revolución
  26. 10.14452/MR-023-09-1972-02_2 · DOI
  27. Marini Ruy Mauro, 1977, Cuadernos Políticos
  28. Marini Ruy Mauro, 2000, A Dialética da Dependência
  29. Minqi Li, 2008, The rise of China and the demise of the capitalist world-economy
  30. Mkandawire Thandika, 2011, Reclaiming the nation: The return of the national question in Africa, Asia and Latin America
  31. Moyo Sam, 2000, Land reform under structural adjustment in Zimbabwe: Land use change in the Mashonaland provinces
  32. Moyo Sam, 2008, African land questions, agrarian transitions and the state: Contradictions of neoliberal land reforms
  33. 10.5040/9781350222175.ch-001 · DOI
  34. 10.1163/156920607X225924 · DOI
  35. Moyo Sam, 2011, Reclaiming the nation: The return of the national question in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 3
  36. Moyo Sam, Land and Agrarion Reform in Zimbabwe: Beyond White-settler Capitalism, 345
  37. Patnaik Prabhat, 1972, Economic and Political Weekly, 197
  38. Patnaik Prabhat, 1986, Lenin and imperialism: An appraisal of theories and contemporary reality, 80
  39. Patnaik Utsa, 1999, The long transition, 351
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511559129 · DOI
  41. Shivji Issa G., 2009, Accumulation in an African periphery
  42. Tandon Yash, 1982, Class, state and imperialism, 154
  43. van der Pijl Kees, 1984, The making of an Atlantic ruling class
  44. 10.1163/156920602760231640 · DOI
  45. 10.30875/e89f8212-en · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moyo, S., Yeros, P., & Jha, P.
Affiliations
  • Sam Moyo is Executive Director, African Institute for Agrarian Studies, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  • Paris Yeros is Adjunct Professor of International Economics, Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Praveen Jha is Chairperson of the Centre for Informal Sector and Labour Studies (CISLS) and faculty of the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning (CESP), School of Social Sciences (SSS), Jawaharlal Nehru University, (JNU) New Delhi.
Venue
Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
Published
2012-08
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
181-203
ISSN
  • 2277-9760
  • 2321-0281
Cited by
60
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review