Land Grabbing, Agribusiness and the Peasantry in Brazil and Mozambique
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the expansion of agribusiness and the evolution of land grabbing in Brazil and Mozambique. The modernization of Brazil’s agricultural sector, which began in the 1960s, successfully expanded into the cerrado region in the 1980s under the state-led PRODECER project. Modernization and state-led programmes such as PRODECER gave new rise to different forms and practices of land grabbing, creating spaces for investment by foreigners. Over the last three decades the production of soybeans in the cerrado has come under substantial foreign control and in recent years, sugarcane production and foreign investment in the ethanol industry has grown markedly in the region; the social and environmental effects of this have been devastating. In this article we will also examine the recent interest of Brazilian agribusinesses in investing in Mozambican land and in particular, the ProSAVANA programme modelled on PRODECER. We argue that while Brazil is subject to land grabbing by foreign capital, it has also become a promoter of land grabbing in Mozambique.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies evoked the emergence of a new soybean frontier in Southern Africa, where Brazil is reinforcing its economic presence.
“Recent studies also evoked the emergence of a new soybean frontier in Southern Africa, where Brazil is reinforcing its economic presence ( Gasparri et al., 2015, Clements and Fernandes, 2013, Seibert, 2011, Oliveira, 2015and Shankland and Gonalves, 2016).”
From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Clements and Fernandes, 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tritsch, I., & Arvor, D. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clements, E. A., & Fernandes, B. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
- Venue
- Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-69
- ISSN
- 2277-9760 (ISSN-L)
- 2321-0281
- OpenAlex
- W2006856506
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 38.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Keywords
- land grabbing, agribusiness, peasants, ProSAVANA, soybean production, sugarcane, ethanol industry, foreign investment, Cerrado, Brazil, Mozambique, agricultural transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review