The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Origins and Continuation of First World Import Dependence on Developing Countries for Agricultural Products
Abstract
This article puts forward two main propositions which have been discussed at length in earlier papers and supports these with historical and current data, which have not been presented before. The first proposition is that the origins of Third World food dependence lie in the First World’s dependence on developing countries for both food and non-food imports. The second is that the advanced countries’ dependence has not declined, on the contrary the list of products imported from developing countries has become much longer in recent years, since air-freighting has permitted imports of highly perishable products, not possible earlier.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If Third World agrarian systems oriented production away from agro-export and toward food sovereignty for their laboring classes, and the North moved away from environmentally destructive methods, some higher percentage of core populations would be engaged in agricultural labor.
“If Third World agrarian systems oriented their production away from agro-export (Patnaik, 2015) and toward food sovereignty for their laboring classes, and the North moved away from current environmentally destructive methods of replacing labor and attention with industrial inputs and capital in agriculture, some higher percentage of core populations would be engaged in agricultural labor.”
From A People’s Green New Deal: Obstacles and Prospects (2021) · cites this paper as Patnaik, 2015
The national question is central, with different faces in the North and the South.
“The national question is central, with different faces in the North (Patnaik, 2015) and the South.”
From A People’s Green New Deal: Obstacles and Prospects (2021) · cites this paper as Patnaik, 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Brown Lester, 1995, Who will feed China? Wake-up call for a small world
- Chambers J. D., 1966, The agricultural revolution, 1750–1880
- Davis R., 1979, The Industrial Revolution and British overseas trade
- Friedmann Harriet, 1990, The food question: Profits versus people?, 13
- Hayter Teresa, 1971, Aid as imperialism
- Lewis W. Arthur, 1979, The evolution of the international economic order
- Patnaik U., 1996, Economic and Political Weekly, 2429
- Patnaik U., 2003, Work and well-being in the age of finance
- Patnaik U., 2005, The pioneers of development economics, 31
- Patnaik U., 2006, Globalisation under hegemony, 30
- Patnaik U., 2007, The republic of hunger and other essays
- Patnaik U., 2011, Capitalism, colonialism and globalisation: Studies in economic change, 17
- Patnaik U., 2012, Social Scientist, 40, 3
- Slicher van Bath B. H., 1963, The agrarian history of Europe, A. D. 650–1800
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A People’s Green New Deal: Obstacles and Prospects
Ajl, M. (2021) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES · doi:10.1177/22779760211030864 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Patnaik, U.
- Affiliations
- Utsa Patnaik, Professor Emeritus Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
- Venue
- Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 2277-9760
- 2321-0281
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
