Sentinel Lymph Node Labeling of Patients with Deep Infiltrating Rectovaginal Endometriosis – Does this Make Sense?
Abstract
Purpose: Deep infiltrating endometriosis is a chronic disease of largely unresolved pathogenesis. Lymphatic dissemination of endometriotic cells has been shown in incidentally removed mesorectal lymph nodes (ILNs) and in pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) but its significance is unknown. To evaluate this observation further, we compared occurrences and morphology of endometriotic lesions (EM-lesions) within pelvic SLNs with those within ILN. Methods: From 18 patients, 58 pelvic SLNs and from additional 23 patients 105 ILNs, found in the resection specimens, were excised. All lymph nodes were examined for possible endometriotic lesions. Detection of endometriotic lesions were performed by immunohistochemical analysis of possible expression of estrogen and progesterone-receptors as well as CD10 and cytokeratin. Furthermore, two dimensional sizes of endometriotic lesions were measured. Results: Endometriotic lesions were found in 14 patients: in 6 patients of the SLN-group (33%) and in 8 patients of the group of incidentally removed lymph nodes (28%). EM-lesions of the SLN-group were significantly larger than those of incidentally removed regional LN (size A: p= 0.014; size B: p=0.006). Conclusion: Detection of endometriotic lesions in SLNs and in ILNs has demonstrated lymphatic dissemination of endometriosis. In comparison to the incidentally excised lymph nodes of patients with rectovaginal endometriosis, the sentinel lymph node concept is much more suitable for detection of potentially affected lymph nodes. Therefore, we postulate use of this system in future studies to evaluate the clinical significance of lymphatic dissemination of endometriotic cells. (Journal of Endometriosis 2010; 2: 33–40)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lymphatic metastasis theory of endometriosis is supported by observations of the presence of endometriosis in pelvic lymph nodes and associations between deep-infiltrating endometriosis and lymph node involvement.
“The lymphatic metastasis theory of endometriosis is supported by observations of the presence of endometriosis in pelvic lymph nodes and associations between deepinfiltrating endometriosis and lymph node involvement.[96][97][98]”
From Defining Future Directions for Endometriosis Research: Workshop Report From the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis in Montpellier, France (2013) · cites this paper as [97]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Riedlinger, W. F. J., Weichbrodt, M., Gericke, J., Gericke, C., Schneider, A., Köhler, C., & Mechsner, S.
- Affiliations
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Stiftung Charité (DE)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mechsner, Sylvia
- Venue
- Journal of Endometriosis
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-40
- ISSN
- 2035-9969 (ISSN-L)
- 2036-282X
- OpenAlex
- W4237839650
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- deep infiltrating endometriosis, rectovaginal endometriosis, sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymphatic dissemination, endometriotic lesions, mesorectal lymph nodes, lymph node metastasis, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, CD10, cytokeratin, lesion size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review