Cited by 5Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsGynecological conditions and treatments

Sentinel Lymph Node Labeling of Patients with Deep Infiltrating Rectovaginal Endometriosis – Does this Make Sense?

Riedlinger, Wolfram F. J., Weichbrodt, Miriam, Gericke, Jessica, Gericke, Christine, Schneider, Achim, Köhler, Christhard, Mechsner, Sylvia·2010·Journal of Endometriosis

Abstract

Purpose: Deep infiltrating endometriosis is a chronic disease of largely unresolved pathogenesis. Lymphatic dissemination of endometriotic cells has been shown in incidentally removed mesorectal lymph nodes (ILNs) and in pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) but its significance is unknown. To evaluate this observation further, we compared occurrences and morphology of endometriotic lesions (EM-lesions) within pelvic SLNs with those within ILN. Methods: From 18 patients, 58 pelvic SLNs and from additional 23 patients 105 ILNs, found in the resection specimens, were excised. All lymph nodes were examined for possible endometriotic lesions. Detection of endometriotic lesions were performed by immunohistochemical analysis of possible expression of estrogen and progesterone-receptors as well as CD10 and cytokeratin. Furthermore, two dimensional sizes of endometriotic lesions were measured. Results: Endometriotic lesions were found in 14 patients: in 6 patients of the SLN-group (33%) and in 8 patients of the group of incidentally removed lymph nodes (28%). EM-lesions of the SLN-group were significantly larger than those of incidentally removed regional LN (size A: p= 0.014; size B: p=0.006). Conclusion: Detection of endometriotic lesions in SLNs and in ILNs has demonstrated lymphatic dissemination of endometriosis. In comparison to the incidentally excised lymph nodes of patients with rectovaginal endometriosis, the sentinel lymph node concept is much more suitable for detection of potentially affected lymph nodes. Therefore, we postulate use of this system in future studies to evaluate the clinical significance of lymphatic dissemination of endometriotic cells. (Journal of Endometriosis 2010; 2: 33–40)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/228402651000200106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 5

Authors
Riedlinger, W. F. J., Weichbrodt, M., Gericke, J., Gericke, C., Schneider, A., Köhler, C., & Mechsner, S.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Mechsner, Sylvia
Venue
Journal of Endometriosis
Published
2010-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
33-40
ISSN
  • 2035-9969 (ISSN-L)
  • 2036-282X
OpenAlex
W4237839650
Cited by
5
References
31
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, rectovaginal endometriosis, sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymphatic dissemination, endometriotic lesions, mesorectal lymph nodes, lymph node metastasis, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, CD10, cytokeratin, lesion size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review