Cited by 40Digital Imaging in MedicineElectronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Should ‘smart phones’ be used for patient photography?

Open access
Chan, Natalie, Charette, Jacob, Dumestre, Danielle O, Fraulin, Frankie Og·2016·Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Background: Within the field of plastic surgery, clinical photography is an essential tool. ‘Smart phones’ are increasingly being used for photography in medical settings. Objective: To determine the prevalence of smart phone use for clinical photography among plastic surgeons and plastic surgery residents in Canada. Methods: In 2014, a survey was distributed to all members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons. The questions encompassed four main categories: smart phone use for clinical photos; storage of photos; consent process; and privacy issues. The survey participation rate was 27% (147 of 545) with 103 surgeons and 44 residents. In total, 89.1% (131 of 147) of respondents have taken photographs of patients using smart phones and 57% (74 of 130) store these photos on their phones. In addition, 73% (74 of 102) of respondents store these photos among personal photos. The majority of respondents (75% [106 of 142]) believe obtaining verbal consent before taking clinical photographs is sufficient to ensure privacy is respected. Written consent is not commonly obtained, but 83% (116 of 140) would obtain it, if it could be done more efficiently. Twenty-six percent (31 of 119) of respondents have accidentally shown a clinical photograph on their phone to friends or family. A smart phone application that incorporates a written consent process, and allows photos to be immediately stored externally, is perceived by 59% (83 of 140) to be a possible way to address these issues. Conclusion: Smart phones are commonly used to obtain clinical photographs in plastic surgery. There are issues around consent process, storage of photos and privacy that need to be addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/229255031602400109

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 60% of specialists continue to store photographs of their patients in their personal mobile phones.

    “Although 60% of specialists continue to store photographs of their patients in their personal mobile phones [72,74-77]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, N., Charette, J., Dumestre, D. O., & Fraulin, F. O.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Plastic Surgery
Published
2016-03
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
32-34
ISSN
  • 1195-2199 (ISSN-L)
  • 2292-5503
  • 2292-5511
OpenAlex
W2290854194
Cited by
40
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
smartphone photography, medical photography, patient privacy, informed consent, plastic surgery residents, mobile application

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review