Brown Slime, the Silver Tsunami, and Apocalyptic Demography: The Importance of Ageism and Age Relations
Abstract
Despite our awareness of ageism, sociologists rarely examine either old age as a disadvantaged status or age relations as an inequality that intersects with others. I show how this exclusion limits our theory and our work for social justice. I outline age relations and two kinds of ageism that maintain them, one of them obvious and one more insidious and often found in works of social science. Age relations matter not only to our theory and research, but also to debates over social safety nets and other public policy. I focus on the example of the threatening “silver tsunami” in apocalyptic demography and the construction of dependence through the use of age dependency ratios. Neglect of ageism and age relations keeps sociologists unable to contribute to critical policy debates that shape lives across age groups. Researching how age relations intersect with other inequalities yields findings that contradict what many take for granted about such issues as poverty or sexual harassment. Sociology must focus more than it has on an inequality that shames and excludes elders from full citizenship and robs them of control over their lives. We all face that situation if we live long enough.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each area of scholarship on age-life course sociology, gerontology, and age studies-tends to be somewhat inward-looking.
“While some scholars (e.g., Barrett & Barbee 2022, Calasanti 2020, Twigg 2013) build connections across these intellectual areas, each area tends to be somewhat inward-looking.”
From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Calasanti 2020
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Age-stereotype Paradox: Opportunity for Social Change
Levy, B. R. (2017) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnx059 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Ageism in the American Workplace
Roscigno, V. J. (2010) · Contexts · doi:10.1525/ctx.2010.9.1.16 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework
Barrett, A. E. (2022) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-083121-043741 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Calasanti, T.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Calasanti, Toni
- ORCID
- Calasanti, Toni
- Venue
- Social Currents
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-04-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-211
- ISSN
- 2329-4965 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-4973
- OpenAlex
- W3014411816
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Currents (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Keywords
- ageism, age relations, old age, intersectionality, age dependency ratio, silver tsunami, social safety nets, social policy, poverty, sexual harassment, citizenship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review