The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started
Open accessAbstract
Within the field of hearing science, pupillometry is a widely used method for quantifying listening effort. Its use in research is growing exponentially, and many labs are (considering) applying pupillometry for the first time. Hence, there is a growing need for a methods paper on pupillometry covering topics spanning from experiment logistics and timing to data cleaning and what parameters to analyze. This article contains the basic information and considerations needed to plan, set up, and interpret a pupillometry experiment, as well as commentary about how to interpret the response. Included are practicalities like minimal system requirements for recording a pupil response and specifications for peripheral, equipment, experiment logistics and constraints, and different kinds of data processing. Additional details include participant inclusion and exclusion criteria and some methodological considerations that might not be necessary in other auditory experiments. We discuss what data should be recorded and how to monitor the data quality during recording in order to minimize artifacts. Data processing and analysis are considered as well. Finally, we share insights from the collective experience of the authors and discuss some of the challenges that still lie ahead.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546396 · Cited by 4,482
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7777863 · Cited by 2,929
Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089910 · Cited by 2,891
Society for Neuroscience 2007 abstracts
Wishart, T. M., Paterson, J. M., Short, D. M., Meredith, S., Robertson, K., Sutherland, C. D., Cousin, M. A., Dutia, M. B., & Gillingwater, T. H. (2007) · Cited by 2,094
Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.
Beatty, J. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276 · Cited by 1,959
A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Visscher, K. M., Palmer, E. D., Miezin, F. M., Wenger, K. K., Kang, H. C., Burgund, E. D., Grimes, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.031 · Cited by 1,772
Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1 · Cited by 1,735
Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory
Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.154.3756.1583 · Cited by 1,617
Joshi, S., Li, Y., Kalwani, R. M., & Gold, J. I. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028 · Cited by 1,387
Cited by
Methods in cognitive pupillometry: Design, preprocessing, and statistical analysis
Mathôt, S., & Vilotijević, A. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01957-7 · Cited by 235
Publication guidelines and recommendations for pupillary measurement in psychophysiological studies
Steinhauer, S. R., Bradley, M. M., Siegle, G. J., Roecklein, K. A., & Dix, A. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14035 · Cited by 137
Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation
Kadem, M., Herrmann, B., Rodd, J. M., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2020) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216520964068 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Winn, M. B., Wendt, D., Koelewijn, T., & Kuchinsky, S. E.
- Venue
- Trends in Hearing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 2331216518800869-2331216518800869
- ISSN
- 2331-2165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892648730
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 159
- FWCI
- 14.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2331216518800869
- The paper
- Winn, M. B., Wendt, D., Koelewijn, T., & Kuchinsky, S. E. (2018). Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started. Trends in Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518800869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
