Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4International Relations and Foreign PolicyEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceGlobal Political and Economic Relations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The EU–Japan Partnership in the Post-pandemic Order: What Comes Next?

López, Lluc Vidal·2024·Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs

Abstract

EU–Japan relations have been treated in the literature as a ‘normal relationship’ between two mature actors with a long history of promises, expectations and indifferences. However, since 2004, the EU has been considering its relations with Japan as a strategic partnership; that is, a powerful relationship that plays an increasingly central role in the international system. Recent changes in the EU and Japanese domestic and international environments show how both parties’ relations have shifted from a period of indifferences and low expectations to a new momentum of cooperation in facing common global challenges such as open trade, climate change, multilateralism or the recent pandemic. The main objective of this article is, first, to suggest a framework of analysis to better calibrate the EU–Japan relationship, and second, to understand recent trends in EU–Japan relations that have enabled the Economic Partnership Agreement that entered into force in 2019.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23477970241230376

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Alvstam C., , & Kettunen E. (2019). The EU–Japan economic partnership agreement: Second best option or new generation of preferential trade arrangements? CESIFOForum, 20(2), 3–9.
  2. Bacon P, , Mayer H., , & Nakamura H. (2015). The European Union and Japan. A new chapter in civilian power cooperation? Routledge.
  3. 10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4_1 · DOI
  4. Barbé E. . (2014). La Unión Europea en las relaciones internacionales. Tecnos.
  5. Berkofsky A. (2007, February). The EU and Japan: A partnership in the making. EPC Issue Paper, 5, 1–31.
  6. 10.1080/09555803.2012.699453 · DOI
  7. Berkofsky A. (2017). The EU–Japan strategic partnership agreement (SPA): Responding to the crisis of the liberal world order. Asia Policy Brief 1–8. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/the-eu-japan-strategic-partnership-agreement-spa-responding-to-the-crisis-of-the-liberal-world-o · DOI
  8. 10.4324/9781351172165 · DOI
  9. Castillo I. J. (2014). The EU’s political and security relations with Japan and China 1991–2014: Strategic partnerships? [Doctoral dissertation]. Osaka University, Japan.
  10. 10.1007/978-3-319-92840-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1525/as.2004.44.2.213 · DOI
  12. Easley L. E. (2016, July). How proactive? How pacifist? Charting Japan’s evolving defence posture. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(1), 1–25.
  13. 10.1093/irap/lcy014 · DOI
  14. European Council. (2022). Joint press release: Japan–EU leaders’ meeting 28th June 2022. https://www.mofa.go.jp/erp/ep/shin4e_000015.html
  15. 10.1002/app5.240 · DOI
  16. Felbermayr G. (2019). The EU–Japan economic partnership agreement and the revitalisation of the international economic liberal order. Real Instituto El Cano-ARI, 22.
  17. 10.4324/9780203362785 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/07036330500190164 · DOI
  19. Gilson J. (2020). EU–Japan relations and the crisis of multilateralism. Routledge.
  20. Grevi G. (2010, December). Making EU strategic partnerships effective. FRIDE Working Paper, 102, 1–21.
  21. Hook G. D., , Gilson J., , Hughes C. W., , & Dobson H. (2001). Japan’s international relations. Routledge.
  22. 10.1080/09555803.2012.699455 · DOI
  23. Hughes Ch. W. (2015). Japan’s foreign and security policy under the ‘Abe doctrine’. New dynamism or new dead end? Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Kagan R. (2004). Paradise and power. Atlantic Books.
  25. 10.1353/asp.2017.0035 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/14799855.2017.1333983 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s103080300016 · DOI
  28. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2022b). Extraordinary press conference by Foreign Minister Hayashi Yoshimasa. https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/kaiken/kaiken24e_000120.html
  29. 10.1515/9789048511150 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0047117813497306 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/00396339608442848 · DOI
  32. 10.7312/oros17260 · DOI
  33. Oudjani R. (2004). EU–Asia relations. In Mahncke D., , Ambos A., , & Reynolds Ch. (Eds.), European foreign policy: From rhetoric to reality? Peter Lang.
  34. 10.2307/2538417 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s10308-009-0228-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/10357718.2020.1781790 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10308-006-0075-1 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/aspp.12510 · DOI
  39. 10.4324/9780203008324 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/09555803.2012.699452 · DOI
  41. Söderberg M. (2020, March 3). Connectivity and infrastructure: Can the EU–Japan partnership make a difference? Real Instituto El Cano.
  42. 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371709 · DOI
  43. 10.1163/ej.9789004185012.i-484 · DOI
  44. Tsuruoka M. (2008). Expectations deficit in EU–Japan relations: Why the relationship cannot flourish. Current Politics and Economics of Asia, 17(1), 107–126.
  45. Vanoverbeke D., , Suami T., , Ueta T., , Peeters N., , & Ponjaert F. (2018). Developing EU–Japan relations in a changing regional context a focus on security, law and policies. Routledge.
  46. Watanabe H. (2016). Les relations Japon–Europe en Asie, au niveau multilatéral. Relations Internationales, 4(168), 105–116.
  47. Yamamoto A. M. (2019). EU–Japan EPA and SPA: More than a partnership, a necessary turning point for both. Expert Comment 16/2019.
  48. 10.1080/14799855.2015.1109509 · DOI
  49. Yeo L. H., , & López i Vidal L. (2008). Regionalism and interregionalism in the ASEM context. Current dynamics and theoretical approaches. Documentos CIDOB Asia, 23, 1–76.

Metadata

Authors
López, L. V.
Affiliations
Department of Law and Political Science, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Venue
Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs
Published
2024-02-29
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
122-145
ISSN
  • 2347-7970 (ISSN-L)
  • 2349-0039
OpenAlex
W4392353584
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
Keywords
EU-Japan relations, strategic partnership, Economic Partnership Agreements, trade cooperation, climate change cooperation, multilateralism, global challenges, EU external relations, Japanese foreign policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review