Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions
Abstract
Student cognition and motivation, as well as institutional policies, determine student course grades and retention in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Regarding cognition, study skills relate to course grades, and grades relate to retention in STEM. Several aspects of motivation are related to both grades and retention in STEM: self-efficacy (self-confidence for completing assignments), continuing interest in learning more about the subject, and effort control (remaining focused on classes and studying). Students’ cognition and motivation are interdependent, and, furthermore, they play out in the context of multiple institutional policies, such as academic support centers, career counseling, financial aid policies, forced curving of course grades, course timing, and course registration policies. All of these interdependent factors can improve with targeted programs that complement each other. Some challenges for reform include instructor resistance to changing teaching and a lack of coordination, or even competing emphases, among university policies and resources, such as course scheduling, academic support, advising, career counseling, and financial aid.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
STEM research has linked students' early overall GPA with STEM retention.
“STEM research has linked students’ early overall GPA with STEM retention (Cromley et al., 2016).”
From A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021) · cites this paper as Cromley et al., 2016
Cites
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332 · see citing works
Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177067 · Cited by 1,220 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Various motivation-boosting techniques—short-term (e.g., brief students writing about the relevance of the content; Hulleman & Harackiewicz, 2009) and longer term (e.g., semester-long exam feedback; Muis, Ranellucci, Franco, & Crippen, 2013)—have shown promise for increasing STEM student…”
BackgroundHenderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20439 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hansen, M. J., Palakal, M. J., & White, L. (2024) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-023-00096-8 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cromley, J. G., Perez, T., & Kaplan, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Old Dominion University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cromley, Jennifer G.
- Venue
- Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-12-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-11
- ISSN
- 2372-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2309673531
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 24.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Keywords
- STEM retention, student motivation, self-efficacy, effortful control, study skills, course grades, institutional policy, academic support center, career guidance, financial aid policy, course scheduling, academic advising, higher education reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review