CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPublic Health Policies and EducationSocial Movements and Cultural Identity

Antiracism and the pursuit of social justice

Bentley, Kelly M., Fortune, Deborah, Rooks, Ronica, Walter, Gayle·2021·Pedagogy in Health Promotion
DOI 10.1177/23733799211054402
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23733799211054402

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bentley and colleagues were one of the two editorials identified, and their article presents a collection of articles identified by Pedagogy in Health Promotion that describe pedagogical practices used to incorporate concepts and topics of race, racism, social justice, and oppression within higher education classrooms.

    “Bentley and colleagues (63) were one of the two editorials identified, which is distinct from other articles in that it is not an active implementation of best practices, but instead an intentional presentation of others’ work that meets a journal’s call for papers.”

    From Exploring public health education’s integration of critical race theories: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

  • Articles that explicitly noted using an antiracist praxis as the theoretical and pragmatic underpinning of their efforts were unique in that none reported an individual assessment, but instead described a more holistic approach to competency reform, course design, and recognition of best practices.

    “Articles that explicitly noted using an antiracist praxis as the theoretical and pragmatic underpinning of their efforts were unique in that none reported an individual assessment, but instead described a more holistic approach to competency reform (61), course design (62), and recognition of best practices (63).”

    From Exploring public health education’s integration of critical race theories: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Bentley, K. M., Fortune, D., Rooks, R., & Walter, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Maine at Farmington (US)
  • North Carolina Central University (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Bentley, Kelly M.
ORCID
Venue
Pedagogy in Health Promotion
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2021-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
296-298
ISSN
  • 2373-3799 (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-3802
DOI
10.1177/23733799211054402
OpenAlex
W4200185614
Cited by
4
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Pedagogy in Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
anti-racism, social justice, racism, health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review