Cited by 63Corporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessHuman Resource and Talent Management

Achieving sustainable development goals through common-good HRM: Context, approach and practice

Open access
Aust, Ina, Cooke, Fang Lee, Muller-Camen, Michael, Wood, Geoffrey·2024·German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung

Abstract

This introduction to the special issue Achieving Sustainable Development Goals through Common-Good HRM: Context, approach and practice draws the links between the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the concept of Common-Good HRM and the practice of human resource management (HRM) to extend intellectual and empirical insights into this important field. Particular attention is accorded to the collective social and environmental dimensions of SDGs and the place of HRM in contributing to the ‘common good’ within and beyond the workplace. Firms may create space and incentives for HRM to promote sustainability, or actively work to constrain meaningful action in this regard. This collection brings together a broad cross-section of articles dealing with the SDGs and HRM, identifying emerging common ground and contestation as a basis for future HRM theory building, empirical enquiry and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23970022241240890

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A new perspective has emerged challenging the traditional focus of implementing HRM practices to achieve organizational performance and economic benefits toward the design and implementation of HRM practices aimed at addressing the 'grand challenges' of our time, including wellbeing, equality, decent work, and overall long-term sustainability.

    “In response; a new perspective has emerged; challenging the traditional focus of implementing HRM practices to achieve organizational performance and economic benefits toward the design and implementation of HRM practices aimed at addressing the ' grand challenges ' of our time; including wellbeing; equality; decent work; and overall long-term sustainability (Abbass et al., 2022; Aust et al., 2024”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Argandoña A (1998) The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1093-1102.
  2. Aust I, Cooke F, and Muller-Camen M, et al. (2022) Special Issue: Achieving sustainable develop- ment goals through a common-good HRM: Context, approach and practice. German Journal of Human Resource Management 36(2): 197-201.
  3. Aust I and Gehrke B (2024) Leading sustainability transformation. In: Gehrke B, Claes M-T, Pauknerova D, et al. (eds) Global Leadership Practices: Competencies for Navigating in a Complex World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.89-108.
  4. Baird C and Mayer D (2021) On integrative social contracts theory and corporate decision-making in a polarized political economy. Business and Society Review 126(1): 3-23.
  5. Baldassari P, Muller-Camen M and Aust I (2024) The sustainable HRM-SDG nexus: Contributions to global sustainable development. In: Lueg K and Jebsen S (eds) Social Sustainability and Good Work in Organizations. London: Routledge, pp.173-198.
  6. Baumüller J and Sopp K (2022) Double materiality and the shift from non-financial to European sustainability reporting: Review, outlook and implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 23(1): 8-28.
  7. Beddewela E and Herzig C (2013) Corporate social reporting by MNCs' subsidiaries in Sri Lanka. Accounting Forum 37(2): 135-149.
  8. Berg F, Fabisik K and Sautner Z (2020) Rewriting history II: The (un) predictable past of ESG ratings. In: European Corporate Governance Institute-Finance Working Paper 708, pp.10-2139.
  9. Brandl J, Chore LI and Junker M (2024) How you value shapes whom you value: The contribution of apprenticeships to sustainable development goals. German Journal of Human Resource Management 38(2): 231-256.
  10. Brewster C and Brookes M (2024) Sustainable development goals and new approaches to HRM: Why HRM specialists will not reach the sustainable development goals and why it matters. German Journal of Human Resource Management 38(2): 183-201.
  11. Brosch N (2023) Corporate purpose: From a 'Tower of Babel' phenomenon towards construct clarity. Journal of Business and Economics 93: 567-595.
  12. Busch T, Barnett ML, Burritt RL, et al. (2024) Moving beyond 'the' business case: How to make corporate sustainability work. Business Strategy and the Environment 33(2): 776-787.
  13. Bush JT (2020) Win-win-lose? Sustainable HRM and the promotion of unsustainable employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Review 30(3): 100676.
  14. Cooke FL, Dickmann M and Parry E (2022) Building sustainable societies through human-cen- tred human resource management: emerging issues and research opportunities. International Journal of Human Resource Management 33(1): 1-15.
  15. Crichton R, Shrivastava P, Walker T, et al. (2024) Going green in the Norwegian fossil fuel sec- tor? The case of sustainability culture at Equinor. German Journal of Human Resource Management 38(2): 140-158.
  16. Doh J, Budhwar P and Wood G (2021) Long-term energy transitions and international business: Concepts, theory, methods, and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies 52(5): 951-970.
  17. Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review 16(3): 620-627.
  18. Garlei C and Bartel-Radic A (2024) Tidying up the concept of grand challenges. A bibliometric analysis. M@n@gement, January, in press.
  19. George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A, et al. (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand chal- lenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal 59(6): 1880-1895.
  20. Geradine K and McWha-Hermann I (2024) In search of decent work: Human resource managers as custodians of fair reward in international NGOs. German Journal of Human Resource Management 38(2): 202-230.
  21. Ghauri P and Cooke FL (2022) The role of MNEs in achieving United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. In: Merchant H (ed.) The New Frontiers of International Business: Development, Evolving Topics, and Implications for Practice. Cham: Springer, pp.329-344.
  22. Gibson Brandon R, Krueger P and Schmidt PS (2021) ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal 77(4): 104-127.
  23. Guerci M, Hauff S, Panichella N, et al. (2023) Sustainable HRM and class-based inequality. Personnel Review 52(5): 1597-1613.
  24. Harney B (2019) System theory, forgotten legacy and future prospects. In: Townsend K, Cafferkey K, McDermott AM, et al. (eds) Elgar Introduction to Theories of Human Resources and Employment Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.112-127.
  25. Jackson SE, Renwick DWS, Jabbour CJC, et al. (2011) State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. German Journal of Human Resource Management 25(2): 99-116.
  26. Jackson SE and Schuler RS (1995) Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology 46: 237-264.
  27. Järlström M, Saru E, Viitasaari M, et al. (2024) Integrating 'common good' authenticity for sustainable human resource management reporting. German Journal of Human Resource Management 38(2): 159-182.
  28. Jebsen S, Tzini K, Rohlfer S, et al. (2024) Sustainable HRM and new ways of working. Call for papers Management Review. Available at: https://www.nomos.de/wp-content/ uploads/2023/10/mrev-euram-cfp-sustainabile-HRM-and-new-ways-of-working_v1.pdf
  29. Jia S and Shang H (2024) Utilizing green financing in developing green HRM resources for carbon neutrality: presenting multidimensional perspectives of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31(6): 8798-8811.
  30. Kramar R (2022) Sustainable human resource management: Six defining characteristics. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 60(1): 146-170.
  31. Kruse P and Wegge J (2024) A constructive error management culture promotes innovation and corporate social responsibility: A multi-level analysis in 10 countries. German Journal of Human Resource Management 38(2): 111-139.
  32. Lashitew AA (2021) Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change? Journal of International Business Policy 4: 184-200.
  33. Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage Publications.
  34. Lu Y, Zhang MM, Yang MM, et al. (2023) Sustainable human resource management prac- tices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management 62(3): 331-353.
  35. Macke J and Genari D (2019) Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource manage- ment. Journal of Cleaner Production 208: 806-815.
  36. Matthews B, Obereder Aust I, et al. (2018) Competing paradigms: Status-quo and alternative approaches in HRM. In: Renwick D (ed.) Contemporary Developments in Green Human Resource Management Research. London: Routledge, pp.116-134.
  37. Muller AR, Pfarrer MD and Little LM (2014) A theory of collective empathy in corporate philan- thropy decisions. Academy of Management Review 39(1): 1-21.
  38. Nekhili M, Boukadhaba A and Nagati H (2021) The ESG-financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter? Corporate Governance 29(2): 134-161.
  39. Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Pham NT, Jabbour CJC, Pereira V, et al. (2023) Common good human resource management, ethical employee behaviors, and organizational citizenship behaviors toward the individual. Human Resource Management Journal 33: 977-1000.
  42. Podgorodnichenko N, Edgar F and Akmal A (2022) An integrative literature review of the CSR- HRM nexus: Learning from research-practice gaps. Human Resource Management Review 32(3): 100839.
  43. Reppmann M, Edinger Schons LM, Kunzlmann J, et al. (2024) Sustainability Transformation Monitor 2024. 10.11586/2024010. Available at: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/ publications/publication/did/sustainability-transformation-monitor-2024 · DOI
  44. Rodríguez Aboytes JG and Barth M (2020) Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: A systematic literature review (1999-2019). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 21(5): 993-1013.
  45. Rosa H (2019) Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  46. Roundy PT and Burke-Smalley L (2022) Leveraging entrepreneurial ecosystems as human resource systems: A theory of meta-organizational human resource management. Human Resource Management Review 32(4): 100863.
  47. Sarasvathy SD and Ramesh A (2019) An effectual model of collective action for addressing sus- tainability challenges. Academy of Management Perspectives 33(4): 405-424.
  48. Shen J and Benson J (2016) When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management 42(6): 1723-1746.
  49. Shipton H, Biron M, Fu N, et al. (2024) HRM for the greater good: Mapping the field and envi- sioning the future: Special Issue Call. Human Resource Management Review. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/human-resource-management-review/about/call-for- papers (accessed 17 March 2024).
  50. Snell SA, Swart J, Morris S, et al. (2023) The HR ecosystem: Emerging trends and a future research agenda. Human Resource Management 62(1): 5-14.
  51. Solinger ON, Heusinkveld S and Cornelissen JP (2024) Redefining concepts to build theory: A repertoire for conceptual innovation. Human Resource Management Review 34(1): 100988.
  52. Stahl GK, Brewster CJ, Collings DG, et al. (2020) Enhancing the role of human resource manage- ment in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimen- sional approach to HRM. Human Resource Management Review 30(3): 100708.
  53. Su Y, Xia J, Zahra SA, et al. (2023) Family CEO successor and firm performance: The mod- erating role of sustainable HRM practices and corporate philanthropy. Human Resource Management 62(3): 307-330.
  54. Taylor P and Earl C (2023) Age management for the Common Good. Economic and Labour Relations Review 34(1): 179-188.
  55. Tsang A, Frost T and Cao H (2023) Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. British Accounting Review 55(1): 101149.
  56. Uyar A, Karaman AS and Kilic M (2020) Is corporate social responsibility reporting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 253: 119997.
  57. Van Maanen J (2011) Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies 48(1): 218-234.
  58. Westerman JW, Rao MB, Vanka S, et al. (2020) Sustainable human resource management and the triple bottom line: Multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Human Resource Management Review 30(3): 100742.

Authors
Aust, I., Cooke, F. L., Muller-Camen, M., & Wood, G.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • WU Vienna, Austria
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Aust, Ina
Venue
German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung
Published
2024-05
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
93-110
ISSN
  • 0179-6437 (ISSN-L)
  • 2397-0022
  • 2397-0030
OpenAlex
W4396646227
Cited by
63
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
30.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • WU Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals, human resource management, corporate sustainability, workplace sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review