The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Slow violence and toxic geographies: ‘Out of sight’ to whom?
Open accessAbstract
Toxic pollution is a form of violence. This article explores the gradual brutalities that communities surrounded by petrochemical infrastructure endure over time. Contributing to political geographies of violence and environmental justice, this paper puts the concept of ‘slow violence’ into critical comparison with work on ‘structural violence’. In doing so, the paper makes two key contributions: First, it emphasizes the intimate connections between structural and slow forms of harm, arguing that structural inequality can mutate into noxious instances of slow violence. Second, the paper pushes back against framings of toxic landscapes as entirely invisible to the people they impact. Instead of accepting the standard definition of slow violence as ‘out of sight’, we have to instead ask the question: ‘out of sight to whom?’ In asking this question, and taking seriously the knowledge claims of communities who inhabit toxic spaces, we can begin to unravel the political structures that sustain the uneven geographies of pollution. Based on long-term ethnographic research in a postcolonial region of Louisiana, nicknamed ‘Cancer Alley’, this paper reveals how people gradually ‘witness’ the impacts of slow violence in their everyday lives. Finally, drawing on the notion of ‘epistemic violence’, the paper suggests that slow violence does not persist due to a lack of arresting stories about pollution, but because these stories do not count, thus rendering certain populations and geographies vulnerable to sacrifice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
null (2016) · Philosophy Study · doi:10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · Cited by 28,317
On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place
McKittrick, K. (2011) · Social & Cultural Geography · doi:10.1080/14649365.2011.624280 · Cited by 1,105
Gendered Harm and Structural Violence in the British Asylum System
Canning, V. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315720975 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Epistemic Borderwork: Violent Pushbacks, Refugees, and the Politics of Knowledge at the EU Border
Davies, T., Isakjee, A., & Obradovic-Wochnik, J. (2023) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2022.2077167 · Cited by 104
Self-citationGupta, T. D., Carneiro, B., Schapendonk, F., Pacillo, G., Suza, M., & Läderach, P. (2023) · International Development Planning Review · doi:10.3828/idpr.2023.5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, T.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 409-427
- ISSN
- 2399-6544 (ISSN-L)
- 2399-6552
- OpenAlex
- W2936648467
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 66.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slow violence and toxic geographies: ‘Out of sight’ to whom? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2399654419841063
- The paper
- Davies, T. (2022). Slow violence and toxic geographies: ‘Out of sight’ to whom? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419841063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.