Cited by 2Transboundary Water Resource ManagementClimate change impacts on agricultureEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones

Through the lens of inequality: what can we learn from CGIAR as a case study of research on the climate-security nexus?

Open access
Gupta, Tanaya Dutta, Carneiro, Bia, Schapendonk, Frans, Pacillo, Grazia, Suza, Ma, Läderach, Peter·2023·International Development Planning Review

Abstract

Whether it is climate, conflict, or COVID-19, inequality is a key component of any crisis as it can reveal why some people and regions are disproportionately impacted over others. While climate impacts interacting with inequalities can exacerbate existing drivers of insecurity, it can also leave room for institutions and interventions to foster cooperation and build resilience and peace. Focusing on insights from literature on the climate–security–inequality nexus and using CGIAR as a case study on how research for development work has engaged with the nexus, the article conducts a knowledge mapping exercise to highlight gaps and scope in mapping inequality in relation to CGIAR’s work on climate, resilience, insecurity and conflict. Key findings emerging from the analysis support that while inequality has typically been studied in relation to either climate or conflict, there is greater scope for focusing on context-specific mechanisms and pathways. The article concludes with recommendations for a growing climate-security community of practice to see and act through the lens of inequality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3828/idpr.2023.5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, T. D., Carneiro, B., Schapendonk, F., Pacillo, G., Suza, M., & Läderach, P.
Affiliations
CGIAR (FR)
Venue
International Development Planning Review
Published
2023-10-05
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
351-375
ISSN
  • 1474-6743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-3401
OpenAlex
W4367399890
Cited by
2
References
72
Citations by year
2024: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Development Planning Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Universität Hamburg
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Keywords
inequality, climate-security nexus, CGIAR, research for development, climate change, conflict, insecurity, resilience, peacebuilding, knowledge mapping, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review