The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 172 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E3 Ligase Ligands for PROTACs: How They Were Found and How to Discover New Ones
Open accessAbstract
Bifunctional degrader molecules, also called proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), are a new modality of chemical tools and potential therapeutics to understand and treat human disease. A required PROTAC component is a ligand binding to an E3 ubiquitin ligase, which is then joined to another ligand binding to a protein to be degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The advent of nonpeptidic small-molecule E3 ligase ligands, notably for von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and cereblon (CRBN), revolutionized the field and ushered in the design of drug-like PROTACs with potent and selective degradation activity. A first wave of PROTAC drugs are now undergoing clinical development in cancer, and the field is seeking to extend the repertoire of chemistries that allow hijacking new E3 ligases to improve the scope of targeted protein degradation.Here, we briefly review how traditional E3 ligase ligands were discovered, and then outline approaches and ligands that have been recently used to discover new E3 ligases for PROTACs. We will then take an outlook at current and future strategies undertaken that invoke either target-based screening or phenotypic-based approaches, including the use of DNA-encoded libraries (DELs), display technologies and cyclic peptides, smaller molecular glue degraders, and covalent warhead ligands. These approaches are ripe for expanding the chemical space of PROTACs and usher in the advent of other emerging bifunctional modalities of proximity-based pharmacology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis
Maxwell, P. H., Wiesener, M. S., Chang, G.-W., Clifford, S. C., Vaux, E. C., Cockman, M. E., Wykoff, C. C., Pugh, C. W., Maher, E. R., & Ratcliffe, P. J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20459 · Cited by 5,180
Targeting Hypoxia-Inducible Factors for the Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
Locatelli, F., Fishbane, S., Block, G. A., & Macdougall, I. C. (2017) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000455166 · Cited by 4,813
In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2
Vassilev, L. T., Vu, B. T., Graves, B., Carvajal, D., Podlaski, F., Filipovic, Z., Kong, N., Kammlott, U., Lukacs, C., Klein, C., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1092472 · Cited by 4,661
Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1
Forsythe, J. A., Jiang, B.-H., Iyer, N. V., Agani, F., Leung, S. W., Koos, R. D., & Semenza, G. L. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.9.4604 · Cited by 3,981
Baell, J. B., & Holloway, G. A. (2010) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm901137j · Cited by 3,944
Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Senior, A. W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T., Qin, C., Žídek, A., Nelson, A. W. R., Bridgland, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · Cited by 3,378
Semenza, G. L., & Wang, G. L. (1992) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.12.12.5447 · Cited by 2,617
Sakamoto, K. M., Kim, K. B., Kumagai, A., Mercurio, F., Crews, C. M., & Deshaies, R. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.141230798 · Cited by 2,609
Antitumor Activity of Thalidomide in Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Singhal, S., Mehta, J., Desikan, R., Ayers, D., Roberson, P., Eddlemon, P., Munshi, N., Anaissie, E., Wilson, C., Dhodapkar, M., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199911183412102 · Cited by 2,575
Identification of a Primary Target of Thalidomide Teratogenicity
Ito, T., Ando, H., Suzuki, T., Ogura, T., Hotta, K., Imamura, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., & Handa, H. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177319 · Cited by 2,136
Cited by
PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue
Békés, M., Langley, D. R., & Crews, C. M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6 · Cited by 3,395
PROTACs: past, present and future
Li, K., & Crews, C. M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00193d · Cited by 869
Protein degraders enter the clinic — a new approach to cancer therapy
Chirnomas, D., Hornberger, K. R., & Crews, C. M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00736-3 · Cited by 658
Recent Developments in PROTAC‐Mediated Protein Degradation: From Bench to Clinic
Hu, Z., & Crews, C. M. (2022) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202100270 · Cited by 231
DCAF11 Supports Targeted Protein Degradation by Electrophilic Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras
Zhang, X., Luukkonen, L. M., Eissler, C. L., Crowley, V. M., Yamashita, Y., Schafroth, M. A., Kikuchi, S., Weinstein, D. S., Symons, K. T., Nordin, B. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c00990 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishida, T., & Ciulli, A.
- Venue
- SLAS Discovery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 484-502
- ISSN
- 2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095840616
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 172
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E3 Ligase Ligands for PROTACs: How They Were Found and How to Discover New Ones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2472555220965528
- The paper
- Ishida, T., & Ciulli, A. (2021). E3 Ligase Ligands for PROTACs: How They Were Found and How to Discover New Ones. SLAS Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1177/2472555220965528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
