Cited by 201Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

DCAF11 Supports Targeted Protein Degradation by Electrophilic Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras

Open access
Zhang, Xiaoyu, Luukkonen, Lena M., Eissler, Christie L., Crowley, Vincent M., Yamashita, Yu, Schafroth, Michael A., Kikuchi, Shota, Weinstein, David S. +11 more·2021·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Ligand-induced protein degradation has emerged as a compelling approach to promote the targeted elimination of proteins from cells by directing these proteins to the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery. So far, only a limited number of E3 ligases have been found to support ligand-induced protein degradation, reflecting a dearth of E3-binding compounds for proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) design. Here, we describe a functional screening strategy performed with a focused library of candidate electrophilic PROTACs to discover bifunctional compounds that degrade proteins in human cells by covalently engaging E3 ligases. Mechanistic studies revealed that the electrophilic PROTACs act through modifying specific cysteines in DCAF11, a poorly characterized E3 ligase substrate adaptor. We further show that DCAF11-directed electrophilic PROTACs can degrade multiple endogenous proteins, including FBKP12 and the androgen receptor, in human prostate cancer cells. Our findings designate DCAF11 as an E3 ligase capable of supporting ligand-induced protein degradation via electrophilic PROTACs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.1c00990

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 2019, covalent recruiters have been used to validate a large proportion of E3 ligases harnessed for targeted protein degradation, including RNF114, RNF4, DCAF16, DCAF11, KEAP1 and FEM1B.

    “Since 2019, covalent recruiters have been used to validate a large proportion of the E3 ligases that have been harnessed for targeted protein degradation, including RING finger protein 114 (RNF114), RNF4, DDB1 and CUL4-associated factor 16 (DCAF16), DCAF11, KEAP1 and, most recently, fem-1 homologue B (FEM1B)187–193.”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [191]

  • Covalent drug discovery platforms have facilitated expansion of targeted protein degradation by enabling discovery of covalent recruiters against E3 ubiquitin ligases.

    “Covalent drug discovery platforms have facilitated the expansion of targeted protein degradation approaches by enabling the discovery of covalent recruiters against E3 ubiquitin ligases14,187–193.”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [191]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Luukkonen, L. M., Eissler, C. L., Crowley, V. M., Yamashita, Y., Schafroth, M. A., Kikuchi, S., Weinstein, D. S., Symons, K. T., Nordin, B. E., Rodriguez, J. L., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Bauer, L. G., Dix, M. M., Stamos, D., Kinsella, T. M., Simon, G. M., Baltgalvis, K. A., & Cravatt, B. F.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Vividion Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • Otsuka (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Xiaoyu
  • Cravatt, Benjamin F.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2021-03-30
Volume
143
Issue
13
Pages
5141-5149
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3152373163
Cited by
199
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 8
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA212467, CA231991, CA248715)
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-2341-18)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
PROTACs, E3 ubiquitin ligase, ubiquitin-proteasome system, cysteine modification, FBXW7, androgen receptor, prostate cancer, bifunctional molecules, functional screening
MeSH terms
Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Receptors, Androgen, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review