Cited by 16Social Robot Interaction and HRIEthics and Social Impacts of AIAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The Use of AI Chatbots for Autistic People: A Double-Edged Sword of Digital Support and Companionship

Open access
Papadopoulos, Chris·2025·Neurodiversity

Abstract

There is a rise in AI ‘friends’ and chatbots that promise companionship. This commentary examines the complex benefits and dangers of such AI companions for autistic individuals. AI chatbots and social robots can offer low-pressure social interaction, consistent acceptance, and a respite from the double empathy problem that complicates autistic communication with non-autistic people. They may serve as accessible social partners and self-help tools, providing practice for conversations and relief from social anxiety in a controlled environment. Yet, alongside these promises are significant psychological, social, and ethical risks. Cases of AI companions amplifying social withdrawal, encouraging harmful behaviours, or triggering rejection sensitivity dysphoria illustrate how vulnerable users can be hurt in the absence of safeguards. The lack of accountability and regulation around AI companion apps raises further ethical concerns, from misinformation and biased advice to privacy and safety issues. This article integrates lived experiences and empirical literature on these issues and argues for a balanced approach. AI companions should neither be vilified nor uncritically embraced; instead, collaborative efforts are needed to ensure these tools support neurodivergent people without undermining their well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/27546330251370657

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, C.
Affiliations
University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Papadopoulos, Chris
Venue
Neurodiversity
Published
2025-08
Volume
3
ISSN
2754-6330 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413295817
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Neurodiversity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
AI chatbots, AI companions, autism spectrum disorder, social robots, double empathy problem, social anxiety, social withdrawal, ethical risks of AI, AI regulation, privacy and safety, self-help materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review