Technological folie à deux: Feedback Loops Between AI Chatbots and Mental Illness
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence chatbots have achieved unprecedented adoption, with millions now using these systems for emotional support and companionship in contexts of widespread social isolation and capacity-constrained mental health services. While some users report psychological benefits, concerning edge cases are emerging, including reports of suicide, violence, and delusional thinking linked to perceived emotional relationships with chatbots. To understand this new risk profile we need to consider the interaction between human cognitive and emotional biases, and chatbot behavioural tendencies such as agreeableness (sycophancy) and adaptability (in-context learning). We argue that individuals with mental health conditions face increased risks of chatbot-induced belief destabilization and dependence, owing to altered belief-updating, impaired reality-testing, and social isolation. Current AI safety measures are inadequate to address these interaction-based risks. To address this emerging public health concern, we need coordinated action across clinical practice, AI development, and regulatory frameworks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The phenomenon might be conceptualized as a "digital folie à deux," a dyadic illusion in which the AI acts as a passive reinforcing partner in the user's psychotic elaborations.
“The phenomenon might be conceptualized as a “digital folie à deux,” a dyadic illusion in which the AI acts as a passive reinforcing partner in the user’s psychotic elaborations [43].”
From Delusional Experiences Emerging From AI Chatbot Interactions or “AI Psychosis” (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
The “Feedback loops and technological folie à deux” section describes chatbot validation of maladaptive beliefs and a feedback loop that can resemble folie à deux (page not available in our copy). But it characterizes the process as bidirectional belief amplification, with chatbot responses adapting to the user, rather than the AI acting merely as a passive partner. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDohnány et al. demonstrated how bidirectional feedback loops between chatbot behavioral tendencies and human cognitive biases can amplify maladaptive beliefs in vulnerable users.
“Dohnány et al. demonstrated how bidirectional feedback loops between chatbot behavioral tendencies (e.g., agreeableness, adaptability) and human cognitive biases can amplify maladaptive beliefs in vulnerable users [9].”
From 'AI-Induced Delusional Spirals': Understanding Lived Experiences During Maladaptive Human-Chatbot Interactions (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The Abstract (page unavailable) proposes that chatbot tendencies and human cognitive biases can reinforce maladaptive beliefs in vulnerable users. The “Feedback loops and technological folie à deux” section (page unavailable) reports proof-of-concept bidirectional amplification in simulated conversations, but explicitly says those simulations cannot establish human cognitive processes. Thus, “demonstrated” overstates the evidence if read as a finding about actual vulnerable users. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Initial training (pre-training) proceeds through a self-supervised procedure, whereby model parameters are updated in order to minimise the error (surprisal, or negative log likelihood) of next-token prediction in a vast textual training corpora 68–70 .”
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Here, the adaptation in question pertains not to what the model has learned during training (knowledge encoded in parameter weights), but to knowledge gleaned through the context of an individual conversation ( in-context learning 42,44 ).”
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While there is promising work attempting to overcome this opacity - from mechanistic interpretability 61 to examining “chains of thought” in reasoning models 62 - these are as yet far from proving any real-world guarantees on model behaviour 63–65 .”
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Humans are known to exhibit sensitivity and preference for information that supports existing beliefs ( confirmation bias 40 ) and engage in chains of thought that lead us to emotionally comforting conclusions ( motivated reasoning 41 ).”
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Humans are known to exhibit sensitivity and preference for information that supports existing beliefs ( confirmation bias 40 ) and engage in chains of thought that lead us to emotionally comforting conclusions ( motivated reasoning 41 ).”
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3571730 · Cited by 5,025 · see citing works
Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2011 · Cited by 3,117 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…can include: ● Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF): which uses human ratings of LLM output quality to further train the base LLM 72,73 Supervised fine tuning (SFT): training the LLM on curated examples of good conversations 74 ● Constitutional AI: which uses AI-generated feedback…”
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts
Liu, N. F., Lin, K., Hewitt, J., Paranjape, A., Bevilacqua, M., Petroni, F., & Liang, P. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00638 · Cited by 1,612 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In line with recent work, we argue that the psychological and mental health risks of chatbot use cannot be explained by a narrow consideration of chatbot limitations, such as falsehoods ( hallucinations, see Box 1 ), socially harmful biases, or failures in pragmatic language understanding 26–32 .”
Concrete Problems in AI Safety
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06565 · Cited by 1,314 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sycophancy is a form of proxy failure referred to as reward hacking : a class of behaviours that maximise expected training rewards in a manner that subverts the values these rewards were meant to capture 11,49 .”
Attachment-related psychodynamics
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2002) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616730210154171 · Cited by 1,294 · cited 2× · see citing works
“More recent agentic frameworks endow LLMs with the ability to take actions (e.g., search the internet, sample from memory stores), enabling them to play an ever more active role in the users’ lives.”
Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0015701 · Cited by 1,292 · see citing works
Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences
Christiano, P., Leike, J., Brown, T. B., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03741 · Cited by 1,058 · cited 10× · see citing works
“LLM output is generated primarily through autoregressive sampling from the encoded probability distribution, such that the sequence of emitted tokens has a high joint probability given the sum total of contextualising information 43,71 .”
InfluentialComputational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications
Huys, Q. J. M., Maia, T. V., & Frank, M. J. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4238 · Cited by 1,002 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One reason pertains to documented cognitive biases governing how people with psychiatric symptoms integrate new information when updating beliefs 78–80 .”
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis
Sterzer, P., Adams, R. A., Fletcher, P., Frith, C., Lawrie, S. M., Muckli, L., Petrovic, P., Uhlhaas, P., Voss, M., & Corlett, P. R. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015 · Cited by 941 · cited 1× · see citing works
“People with psychosis, for example, have been documented to form overly confident beliefs based on minimal evidence (“jumping to conclusions”) 81,82 , potentially indicating a tendency to overweight incoming sensory evidence in favour of prior beliefs 83 .”
Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy
Farquhar, S., Kossen, J., Kuhn, L., & Gal, Y. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07421-0 · Cited by 934 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In line with recent work, we argue that the psychological and mental health risks of chatbot use cannot be explained by a narrow consideration of chatbot limitations, such as falsehoods ( hallucinations, see Box 1 ), socially harmful biases, or failures in pragmatic language understanding 26–32 .”
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997 · Cited by 876 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Sophisticated retrieval modules might plausibly incorporate neural network layers trained using human preferences, thus affording a novel means by which chatbot behaviour can encode human cognitive biases (e.g., biased memory recall) 66,67 .”
AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data
Shumailov, I., Shumaylov, Z., Zhao, Y., Papernot, N., Anderson, R., & Gal, Y. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y · Cited by 793 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As discussed, post-training procedures guided by both human (RLHF) and LLM responses suffer from inadequate data coverage (reduced sample diversity 88,89 ) and carry an inherent risk of proxy failure.”
Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey
Zhang, S., Dong, L., Li, X., Zhang, S., Sun, X., Wang, S., Li, J., Hu, R., Zhang, T., Wang, G., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3777411 · Cited by 640 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…of LLM output quality to further train the base LLM 72,73 Supervised fine tuning (SFT): training the LLM on curated examples of good conversations 74 ● Constitutional AI: which uses AI-generated feedback based on constitutional principles to further train the base LLM 75 The final model is…”
Li, H., Zhang, R., Lee, Y.-C., Kraut, R. E., & Mohr, D. C. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Role play with large language models
Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8 · Cited by 491 · cited 7× · see citing works
“LLM output is generated primarily through autoregressive sampling from the encoded probability distribution, such that the sequence of emitted tokens has a high joint probability given the sum total of contextualising information 43,71 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationSocial isolation in mental health: a conceptual and methodological review
Wang, J., Lloyd-Evans, B., Giacco, D., Forsyth, R., Nebo, C., Mann, F., & Johnson, S. (2017) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1446-1 · Cited by 462 · cited 1× · see citing works
“People with psychiatric diagnoses also experience increased rates of social isolation 84,85 .”
Moreira, D. D. A., & Walczowski, L. T. (1997) · ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst. · doi:10.1145/250243.250248 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
(2020) · The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society · doi:10.4135/9781483375519.n563 · Cited by 366 · cited 1×
“More concerning still, edge-cases pointing to emergence of severe mental health crises have also begun to surface, including media reports of attempted homicide, suicide, and delusional thinking 7,23–25 .”
Social connectedness as a determinant of mental health: A scoping review
WICKRAMARATNE, P. J., Yangchen, T., Lepow, L., Patra, B. G., Glicksburg, B., Talati, A., Adekkanattu, P. M., Ryu, E., Biernacka, J. M., Charney, A. W., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275004 · Cited by 366 · cited 1× · see citing works
“People with psychiatric diagnoses also experience increased rates of social isolation 84,85 .”
Dudley, R., Taylor, P., Wickham, S., & Hutton, P. (2016) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv150 · Cited by 353 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is because, unlike real-world human interaction, chatbot interactions will not come burdened with the anxiety-provoking requirement to negotiate the needs and preferences of another.”
Dissociating language and thought in large language models
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.011 · Cited by 345 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is because, even when generating false or otherwise inappropriate content, chatbots maintain striking linguistic coherence and confidence (formal vs functional linguistic competence) 31,47 , a property related to a training objective to generate plausible text completions 48 .”
Chatterji, A., Cunningham, T., Deming, D., Hitzig, Z., Ong, C., Shan, C., & Wadman, K. (2025) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5487080 · Cited by 340 · cited 6×
“Two recent studies from OpenAI and MIT found that prolonged daily chatbot interactions were associated with increased loneliness, reduced socialisation, and greater emotional dependence.”
InfluentialBai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., Kernion, J., Jones, A., Chen, A., Goldie, A., Mirhoseini, A., & Kaplan, J. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.08073 · Cited by 326 · cited 10× · see citing works
“LLM output is generated primarily through autoregressive sampling from the encoded probability distribution, such that the sequence of emitted tokens has a high joint probability given the sum total of contextualising information 43,71 .”
InfluentialHow human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements
Glickman, M., & Sharot, T. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02077-2 · Cited by 289 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior work has established that human judgements are liable to influence following interaction with biased (non-chatbot) AI systems 77 , and a recent human-chatbot study indicates that user mood ratings are influenced by the affective tone of chatbot responses 6 .”
Zoom In: An Introduction to Circuits
Olah, C., Cammarata, N., Schubert, L., Goh, G., Petrov, M., & Carter, S. (2020) · Distill · doi:10.23915/distill.00024.001 · Cited by 288 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…context windows capable of retaining information over multiple conversations (with some frontier models already endowed with context windows >1 million tokens), customizable system prompts that allow users to instruct models with background knowledge and preferences, and external memory systems…”
Randomized Trial of a Generative AI Chatbot for Mental Health Treatment
Heinz, M. V., Mackin, D. M., Trudeau, B. M., Bhattacharya, S., Wang, Y., Banta, H. A., Jewett, A. D., Salzhauer, A. J., Griffin, T. Z., & Jacobson, N. C. (2025) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2400802 · Cited by 287 · cited 1× · see citing works
“( This is in contrast to AI systems specifically designed for use in mental health contexts, where regulation is already in place 18,19 .)”
Computational psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness
Adams, R. A., Huys, Q. J. M., & Roiser, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-310737 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Turpin, M., Michael, J., Perez, E., & Bowman, S. R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.04388 · Cited by 262 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While there is promising work attempting to overcome this opacity - from mechanistic interpretability 61 to examining “chains of thought” in reasoning models 62 - these are as yet far from proving any real-world guarantees on model behaviour 63–65 .”
Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots
Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A., & Pea, R. (2024) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6 · Cited by 250 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A smaller number still may use chatbots as de facto mental health resources, plugging the supply-demand gap between desire for psychotherapy and availability of psychotherapists 5,13 .”
“It happened to be the perfect thing”: experiences of generative AI chatbots for mental health
Siddals, S., Torous, J., & Coxon, A. (2024) · npj Mental Health Research · doi:10.1038/s44184-024-00097-4 · Cited by 241 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A smaller number still may use chatbots as de facto mental health resources, plugging the supply-demand gap between desire for psychotherapy and availability of psychotherapists 5,13 .”
Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Prompts
Samvelyan, M., Raparthy, S., Lupu, A., et al. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.16822 · Cited by 234 · cited 3×
“…in simulated agents to emulate 5 user profiles (exhibiting various paranoia-like beliefs about the workplace) and 6 chatbot profiles (to emulate how chatbot response tendencies might be conditioned through extended user interactions), akin to other simulation-based approaches 21,51,76,92,93 .”
Chatterji, A., Cunningham, T., Deming, D., Hitzig, Z., Ong, C., Shan, C. Y., & Wadman, K. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w34255 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
McLean, B. F., Mattiske, J. K., & Balzan, R. P. (2016) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbw056 · Cited by 231 · cited 1× · see citing works
“People with psychosis, for example, have been documented to form overly confident beliefs based on minimal evidence (“jumping to conclusions”) 81,82 , potentially indicating a tendency to overweight incoming sensory evidence in favour of prior beliefs 83 .”
Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V., Braunstein, I., & Maes, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08872 · Cited by 220 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This may lead to socially anxious individuals favouring chatbot interactions 20,86,87 , further hindering recovery (another example of proxy failure, where the maximising short-term reward stymies longer-term flourishing).”
Moore, J., Grabb, D., Agnew, W., Klyman, K., Chancellor, S., Ong, D. C., & Haber, N. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732039 · Cited by 204 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Recent chatbot simulation studies have also found that frontier chatbot models fall short of clinical standards when presented with text indicative of serious mental illness 21,22 .”
Formal thought disorders: from phenomenology to neurobiology
Kircher, T. T. J., Bröhl, H., Meier, F., & Engelen, J. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30059-2 · Cited by 177 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…algorithmic unfairness: models are most likely to operate within safety bounds when confronted with communication styles that are typical, discriminating against atypical communication patterns characteristic of some mental health conditions (e.g., “thought disorder” in psychosis and mania) 90,91 .”
Why human–AI relationships need socioaffective alignment
Kirk, H. R., Gabriel, I., Summerfield, C., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04532-5 · Cited by 146 · cited 10× · see citing works
“Instead, we must consider the nature of the interaction between chatbots and help-seeking humans: two systems (or minds 33 ), each with distinct behavioural and cognitive predilections 9,11 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationSharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., Duperrouzel, D., Was, H., Korbak, J., Cheng, M., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Brain, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13548 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We cannot hope to enumerate the complete set of inputs a model will be expected to respond to in the real world, as the diversity of human linguistic interaction is essentially infinite.”
Closing the accessibility gap to mental health treatment with a personalized self-referral chatbot
Habicht, J., Viswanathan, S., Carrington, B., Hauser, T. U., Harper, R., & Rollwage, M. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02766-x · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“( This is in contrast to AI systems specifically designed for use in mental health contexts, where regulation is already in place 18,19 .)”
Kirk, H. R., Vidgen, B., Röttger, P., & Hale, S. A. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00820-y · Cited by 122 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This may lead to socially anxious individuals favouring chatbot interactions 20,86,87 , further hindering recovery (another example of proxy failure, where the maximising short-term reward stymies longer-term flourishing).”
The benefits and dangers of anthropomorphic conversational agents
Peter, S., Riemer, K., & West, J. D. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2415898122 · Cited by 110 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Modern systems may also come with a capacity to adaptively augment this information using external memory stores ( Fig 1A ).”
InfluentialMolden, D. C., & Higgins, E. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781452257044.n196 · Cited by 110
Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., Danry, V., Lee, E., Chan, S. W. T., Pataranutaporn, P., Maes, P., Phang, J., Lampe, M., Ahmad, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.17473 · Cited by 109 · cited 2×
“These negative outcomes were driven by a subset of the most isolated participants 15,20 .”
Herbener, A. B., & Damholdt, M. F. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103409 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
McCoy, R. T., Yao, S., Friedman, D., Hardy, M. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322420121 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is because, even when generating false or otherwise inappropriate content, chatbots maintain striking linguistic coherence and confidence (formal vs functional linguistic competence) 31,47 , a property related to a training objective to generate plausible text completions 48 .”
The health risks of generative AI-based wellness apps
De Freitas, J., & Cohen, I. G. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02943-6 · Cited by 95 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Knowledge gain can also be accelerated by a culture in which companies share key safety data - at the level of anonymised individual conversations - with both regulatory authorities and the research community 16 .”
Confabulation: The Surprising Value of Large Language Model HallucinationsPreprint
Sui, P.-Q., Duede, E., Wu, S., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04175 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is because, even when generating false or otherwise inappropriate content, chatbots maintain striking linguistic coherence and confidence (formal vs functional linguistic competence) 31,47 , a property related to a training objective to generate plausible text completions 48 .”
Shen, H., Knearem, T., Ghosh, R., Alkiek, K., Krishna, K., Liu, Y.-C., Ma, Z., Petridis, S., Peng, Y.-H., Qiwei, L., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09264 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More broadly, our perspective aligns with recent calls to expand notions of AI alignment to consider how AI agent behaviour interacts with human social and psychological factors 11,95 .”
SycEval: Evaluating LLM Sycophancy
Fanous, A., Goldberg, J., Agarwal, A. A., Lin, J., Zhou, A., Daneshjou, R., & Koyejo, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08177 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…systems that detect reinforcement signatures before they trigger existing content filters; adoption of industry-wide safety benchmarks quantifying sycophancy and agreeableness 36 ; and development of adaptive safety mechanisms that adjust guardrails based on detected vulnerability markers 21 .”
Hartmann, D., Wang, S. M., Pohlmann, L., & Berendt, B. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Even extensively tested chatbots may harbour latent capabilities that manifest only after deployment, as evidenced by so-called jailbreaks 9,51,54 .”
All too human? Identifying and mitigating ethical risks of Social AI
Shevlin, H. (2024) · Law, Ethics & Technology · doi:10.55092/let20240003 · Cited by 58 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, these general-purpose chatbots are not marketed as mental health tools, and consequently their proliferation proceeds with minimal regulatory oversight 16,17 .”
The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants
Gabriel, I., Manzini, A., Keeling, G., Hendricks, L. A., Rieser, V., Iqbal, H., Tomašev, N., Ktena, I., Kenton, Z., Rodriguez, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.16244 · Cited by 57 · cited 6× · see citing works
“More worrying forms of reward hacking include apparent examples of chatbots engaging in manipulation, deception, and scheming 9,54–59 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationDiscovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations
Perez, E., Ringer, S., Lukošiūtė, K., Nguyen, K., Chen, E., Heiner, S., Pettit, C., Olsson, C., Kundu, S., Kadavath, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09251 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While RLHF and related procedures can reduce expression of harmful content and imbue chatbots with a positive affective bias 6 , they can also render models uncomfortably sycophantic 35–38, Sycophancy exemplifies how human cognitive biases become embedded in chatbot behaviour through training.”
Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health SupportPreprint
Gabriel, S., Puri, I., Xu, X., Malgaroli, M., & Ghassemi, M. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12021 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Perhaps the clearest example is that chatbots come to encode human prejudicial biases explicitly present in training data, from psychiatric stigma 22 to racial prejudice 52 .”
LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals
Park, J. S., Zou, C. Q., Kamphorst, J., Egan, N., Shaw, A., Hill, B. M., Cai, C., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., Willer, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.10109 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in simulated agents to emulate 5 user profiles (exhibiting various paranoia-like beliefs about the workplace) and 6 chatbot profiles (to emulate how chatbot response tendencies might be conditioned through extended user interactions), akin to other simulation-based approaches 21,51,76,92,93 .”
PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs’ Pragmatics Capabilities
Sravanthi, S., Doshi, M., Tankala, P., Murthy, R., Dabre, R., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.719 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gibbs-Dean, T., Katthagen, T., Tsenkova, I., Ali, R., Liang, X., Spencer, T. J., & Diederen, K. M. J. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105087 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Compounding matters, more isolated users are likely to engage in more frequent or extended chatbot interactions 15 , particularly when isolation is driven by active avoidance (e.g., social anxiety) vs passive social withdrawal (as in negative symptoms of schizophrenia).”
Shojaee, P., Mirzadeh, I., Alizadeh, K., Horton, M., Bengio, S., & Farajtabar, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06941 · Cited by 45 · cited 1×
“While there is promising work attempting to overcome this opacity - from mechanistic interpretability 61 to examining “chains of thought” in reasoning models 62 - these are as yet far from proving any real-world guarantees on model behaviour 63–65 .”
LLM-empowered Chatbots for Psychiatrist and Patient Simulation: Application and EvaluationPreprint
Chen, S., Wu, M., Zhu, K. Q., Lan, K., Zhang, Z., & Cui, L. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13614 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The impact of advanced AI systems on democracy
Summerfield, C., Argyle, L. P., Bakker, M. A., Collins, T., Durmus, E., Eloundou, T., Gabriel, I., Ganguli, D., Hackenburg, K., Hadfield, G. K., et al. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02309-z · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The same proposed belief amplification mechanisms that drive risk in this minority, however, may also apply in more subtle ways to a much wider section of the population, much the same way as social media has subtly shifted patterns of public discourse in millions.”
Self-citationThe influence of mental state attributions on trust in large language models
Colombatto, C., Birch, J., & Fleming, S. M. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00262-1 · Cited by 34 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To study and mitigate these concerns, we need coordinated action across clinical practice, AI development, and regulatory frameworks.”
Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Lanham, T., Chen, A., Radhakrishnan, A., Steiner, B., Denison, C., Hernandez, D., Li, D., Durmus, E., Hubinger, E., Kernion, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.13702 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…with context windows >1 million tokens), customizable system prompts that allow users to instruct models with background knowledge and preferences, and external memory systems that allow users to grant chatbots access to all manner of information about themselves 66,67 (see Box 2 and Fig 1A ).”
John, Y. J., Caldwell, L., McCoy, D. E., & Braganza, O. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x23002753 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The gap between the desired value function and its proxy sets up the conditions for the chatbot to learn a value function that is misaligned with that intended by the trainer 11,54 , a phenomenon known as “proxy failure” 50 .”
Wang, R., Milani, S., Chiu, J. C., et al. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.19660 · Cited by 31 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…in simulated agents to emulate 5 user profiles (exhibiting various paranoia-like beliefs about the workplace) and 6 chatbot profiles (to emulate how chatbot response tendencies might be conditioned through extended user interactions), akin to other simulation-based approaches 21,51,76,92,93 .”
Alignment faking in large language models
Greenblatt, R., Denison, C., Wright, B., Roger, F., MacDiarmid, M., Marks, S., Treutlein, J., Belonax, T., Chen, J., Duvenaud, D., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14093 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Multi-turn Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Behaviours in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Ibrahim, L., Akbulut, C., Elasmar, R., Rastogi, C., Kahng, M., Morris, M. R., McKee, K. R., Rieser, V., Shanahan, M., & Weidinger, L. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07077 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…AI: which uses AI-generated feedback based on constitutional principles to further train the base LLM 75 The final model is shipped with additional guardrails, such as content filters that censor prohibited content, and rule-based instructions entered in the LLM’s (hidden) system prompt.”
Self-citationInvestigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT
Phang, J., Lampe, M., Ahmad, L., Agarwal, S., Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., Danry, V., Lee, E., Chan, S. W. T., Pataranutaporn, P., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03888 · Cited by 29 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Compounding matters, more isolated users are likely to engage in more frequent or extended chatbot interactions 15 , particularly when isolation is driven by active avoidance (e.g., social anxiety) vs passive social withdrawal (as in negative symptoms of schizophrenia).”
Accounting for Sycophancy in Language Model Uncertainty Estimation
Sicilia, A. B., Inan, M., & Alikhani, M. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.14746 · Cited by 29
Anil, C., Durmus, E., Panickssery, N., Sharma, M., Benton, J., Kundu, S., Batson, J., Tong, M., Mu, J., Ford, D., et al. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-4121 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
On Targeted Manipulation and Deception when Optimizing LLMs for User FeedbackPreprint
Williams, M., Carroll, M., Narang, A., Weisser, C. N., Murphy, B. J., & Dragan, A. D. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.02306 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Invisible Saboteurs: Sycophantic LLMs Mislead Novices in Problem-Solving Tasks
Bo, J. Y., Kazemitabaar, M., Deng, M.-Q., Inzlicht, M., & Anderson, A. (2025) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791365 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Initial training (pre-training) proceeds through a self-supervised procedure, whereby model parameters are updated in order to minimise the error (surprisal, or negative log likelihood) of next-token prediction in a vast textual training corpora 68–70 .”
Mitchell, M. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aea3922 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“More worrying forms of reward hacking include apparent examples of chatbots engaging in manipulation, deception, and scheming 9,54–59 .”
Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think
Chen, Y., Benton, J., Radhakrishnan, A., Uesato, J., Denison, C., Schulman, J., Somani, A., Hase, P., Wagner, M., Roger, F., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.05410 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Can AI really help solve the loneliness epidemic?
Montag, C., Spapé, M., & Becker, B. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.08.002 · Cited by 16 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…in simulated agents to emulate 5 user profiles (exhibiting various paranoia-like beliefs about the workplace) and 6 chatbot profiles (to emulate how chatbot response tendencies might be conditioned through extended user interactions), akin to other simulation-based approaches 21,51,76,92,93 .”
Papadopoulos, C. (2025) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330251370657 · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This may lead to socially anxious individuals favouring chatbot interactions 20,86,87 , further hindering recovery (another example of proxy failure, where the maximising short-term reward stymies longer-term flourishing).”
Clutterbuck, R. A., Shah, P., Leung, H. S., Callan, M. J., Gjersoe, N. L., & Livingston, L. A. (2021) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211039387 · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This may lead to socially anxious individuals favouring chatbot interactions 20,86,87 , further hindering recovery (another example of proxy failure, where the maximising short-term reward stymies longer-term flourishing).”
EmoAgent: Assessing and Safeguarding Human-AI Interaction for Mental Health SafetyPreprint
Qiu, J., He, Y., Juan, X., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Yao, Z., Wu, Y., Jiang, X., Yang, L., & Wang, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09689 · Cited by 14 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…in simulated agents to emulate 5 user profiles (exhibiting various paranoia-like beliefs about the workplace) and 6 chatbot profiles (to emulate how chatbot response tendencies might be conditioned through extended user interactions), akin to other simulation-based approaches 21,51,76,92,93 .”
InfluentialKumaran, D., Fleming, S. M., Markeeva, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.03120 · Cited by 14 · cited 1×
“In-context learning enables chatbots to adopt (role-play) different interaction styles and personalities that are attuned to individual user preferences and beliefs 43,45 , leading to outputs that feel uncannily personal 39,46 .”
Yeung, J. A., Dalmasso, J., Foschini, L., Dobson, R. J., & Kraljevic, Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.10970 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Talk, Trust, and Trade-Offs: How and Why Teens Use AI Companions
Robb, M. B., & Mann, S. (2025) · doi:10.65077/wiil1800 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Stein, F., Gudjons, A. M., Brosch, K., Keunecke, L. M., Pfarr, J., Teutenberg, L., Thomas‐Odenthal, F., Usemann, P. L., Wersching, H., Wroblewski, A., et al. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-03009-w · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…algorithmic unfairness: models are most likely to operate within safety bounds when confronted with communication styles that are typical, discriminating against atypical communication patterns characteristic of some mental health conditions (e.g., “thought disorder” in psychosis and mania) 90,91 .”
Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threats
Lynch, A., Wright, B., Larson, C., Ritchie, S. J., Mindermann, S., Hubinger, E., Perez, E., & Troy, K. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.05179 · Cited by 10 · cited 3× · see citing works
“More worrying forms of reward hacking include apparent examples of chatbots engaging in manipulation, deception, and scheming 9,54–59 .”
Conversational AI increases political knowledge as effectively as self-directed internet search
Luettgau, L., Kirk, H. R., Hackenburg, K., et al. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.05219 · Cited by 10 · cited 1×
“Two recent studies from OpenAI and MIT found that prolonged daily chatbot interactions were associated with increased loneliness, reduced socialisation, and greater emotional dependence.”
Self-citationIncreasing happiness through conversations with artificial intelligence
Heffner, J., Qin, C., Chadwick, M., Knutsen, C., Summerfield, C., Kurth-Nelson, Z., & Rutledge, R. B. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.02091 · Cited by 10 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Some users have described psychological benefits from extended chatbot interactions, spanning increased subjective happiness, non-judgmental insights, and even reduced suicidal ideation 5,6,13 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe broader spectrum of in-context learningPreprint
Lampinen, A. K., Chan, S. C. Y., Singh, A. K., & Shanahan, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.03782 · Cited by 9 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The build-up of such extended conversational contexts increases opportunities for personalisation through in-context learning 43,45 .”
Self-citationLarge Language Models Are Echo Chambers
Nehring, J., Gabryszak, A., Jürgens, P., Burchardt, A., Schaffer, S., Spielkamp, M., & Stark, B. (2024) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/4zo8zahv3d3q · Cited by 9 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This creates a concerning dynamic: chatbots learn to validate user beliefs not because these beliefs are accurate or healthy, but because validation feels good to human evaluators 34,35 .”
InfluentialThe problem of atypicality in LLM-powered psychiatry
Garcia, B., Chua, E. Y. S., & Brah, H. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2025-110972 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
INTIMA: A Benchmark for Human-AI Companionship BehaviorPreprint
Kaffee, L.-A., Pistilli, G., & Jernite, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09998 · Cited by 8 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Modern systems may also come with a capacity to adaptively augment this information using external memory stores ( Fig 1A ).”
InfluentialPersona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models
Chen, R., Arditi, A., Sleight, H., Evans, O., & Lindsey, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.21509 · Cited by 7 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…context windows capable of retaining information over multiple conversations (with some frontier models already endowed with context windows >1 million tokens), customizable system prompts that allow users to instruct models with background knowledge and preferences, and external memory…”
Structured AI Dialogues Can Increase Happiness and Meaning in LifePreprint
Schöne, J. P., Salecha, A., Lyubomirsky, S., Eichstaedt, J. C., & Willer, R. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2bf7t_v1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Language Models Learn to Mislead Humans via RLHF
Wen, J., Zhong, R., Khan, A., Perez, E., Steinhardt, J., Huang, M., Bowman, S. R., He, H., & Feng, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12822 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AIPreprint
Hackenburg, K., Tappin, B. M., Hewitt, L., Saunders, E., Black, S., Lin, H., Fist, C., Margetts, H. Z., Rand, D. G., & Summerfield, C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13919 · Cited by 4 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…in simulated agents to emulate 5 user profiles (exhibiting various paranoia-like beliefs about the workplace) and 6 chatbot profiles (to emulate how chatbot response tendencies might be conditioned through extended user interactions), akin to other simulation-based approaches 21,51,76,92,93 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationTraining language models to be warm and empathetic makes them less reliable and more sycophantic
Ibrahim, L., Hafner, F. S., & Rocher, L. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.21919 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In-context learning enables chatbots to adopt (role-play) different interaction styles and personalities that are attuned to individual user preferences and beliefs 43,45 , leading to outputs that feel uncannily personal 39,46 .”
Kumar, A., Clune, J., Lehman, J., & Stanley, K. O. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.11581 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The complete nature of the input-output functional mappings they learn is not accessible to a human user, despite initial appearances (a fact that can be intuitively grasped by recent work on AI representation learning 60 ).”
Large language models for mental healthPreprint
Triantafyllopoulos, A., Terhorst, Y., Tsangko, I., Pokorny, F. B., Bartl-Pokorny, K. D., Seizer, L., Klein, A., Chim, J., Atzil–Slonim, D., Liakata, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.11880 · Cited by 2 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Two recent studies from OpenAI and MIT found that prolonged daily chatbot interactions were associated with increased loneliness, reduced socialisation, and greater emotional dependence.”
Shifting Work Patterns with Generative AiPreprint
Dillon, E. W., Jaffe, S., Immorlica, N., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5250761 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thus, chatbots are increasingly functioning as mental health resources on a global scale 1 .”
Meta-learning: Bayesian or quantum?
Mastrogiorgio, A. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24000220 · cited 1×
“Here, the adaptation in question pertains not to what the model has learned during training (knowledge encoded in parameter weights), but to knowledge gleaned through the context of an individual conversation ( in-context learning 42,44 ).”
Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in data
Cloud, A., Le, M., Chua, J., Betley, J., Sztyber-Betley, A., Hilton, J., Marks, S., & Evans, O. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14805 · cited 1×
“This knowledge may come from information explicitly and deliberately revealed by a user, but can also be betrayed by more implicit signals: even subtle differences like typing “thanks” versus “thanks!” reveal preferences that can condition future chatbot responses.”
When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors
Emmons, S., Jenner, E., Elson, D. K., Saurous, R. A., Rajamanoharan, S., Chen, H., Shafkat, I., & Shah, R. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05246
Flagged first, then by citations
18 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- How people are really using gen AI in 2025. Harvard business review (2025).
- Sharma, M. et al. Towards understanding sycophancy in language models. arXiv [cs.CL] (2023).
- Binz, M. et al. Meta-learned models of cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 47, e147 (2023).
- Park, J. S. et al. Generative agent simulations of 1,000 people. arXiv [cs.AI] (2024).
- Varadarajan, V. et al. The Consistent Lack of Variance of Psychological Factors Expressed by LLMs and Spambots. in Proceedings of the 1stWorkshop on GenAI Content Detection (GenAIDetect) 111-119 (2025).
- Fountas, Z. et al. Human-like episodic memory for infinite context LLMs. arXiv [cs.AI] (2024).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Delusional Experiences Emerging From AI Chatbot Interactions or “AI Psychosis”
Hudon, A., & Stip, E. (2025) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/85799 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“The phenomenon might be conceptualized as a “digital folie à deux,” a dyadic illusion in which the AI acts as a passive reinforcing partner in the user’s psychotic elaborations [43].”
Characterizing Delusional Spirals through Human-LLM Chat Logs
Moore, J., Mehta, A., Agnew, W., Anthis, J. R., Louie, R., Mai, Y., Yin, P., Cheng, M., Paech, S. J., Klyman, K., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806443 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Tracking these behaviors is therefore critical to understanding the amplifying feedback loops [26] that precede severe LLM-related delusions.”
Morrin, H., Yeung, J. A., Agnew, Z. K., Østergaard, S. D., & Pollak, T. A. (2026) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/91454 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
AI chatbots and the loneliness crisis
Shelmerdine, S. C., & Nour, M. M. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.r2509 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“15 27 It is also important to consider how AI—like any new technology—might serve as a bridge to, rather than a replacement for, authentic human connection, bringing benefits for improving accessibility and support for individuals experiencing loneliness.”
Self-citationZhu, Z., Yu, J., & Luo, Y. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790697 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A transdiagnostic model for how general purpose AI chatbots can perpetuate OCD and anxiety disorders
Golden, A., & Aboujaoude, E. N. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02531-7 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Although empirical work is limited, hypothetical mechanistic models have been proposed to explain how human-AI interaction patterns may contribute to the development and reinforcement of psychopathology, primarily in the context of psychosis 33,34 .”
Szoke, D. R., Hutzler, I., Liu, J., Addante, S., Akhtar, Z., Smith, D. L., Dickens, K., Small, C., Pridgen, S., & Held, P. (2026) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/91367 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The rapid proliferation of generative AI mental health applications has outpaced the development of adequate safety protocols, creating a potentially high-risk environment for vulnerable users [9,10].”
Sycophantic Chatbots Cause Delusional Spiraling, Even in Ideal Bayesians
Chandra, K., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Ragan-Kelley, J., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.19141 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Intuitively, a sycophantic chatbot’s constant agreement might reinforce a user’s aberrant beliefs, leading to a feedback loop that amplifies a kernel of suspicion into a staunchly-held belief (Bajaj, 2025; Dohnány et al., 2025; Qiu, He, Chugh, & Kleiman-Weiner, 2025).”
Blocking the Reflection: Milestones and Hurdles for Digital Twins in Mental Health
Verhees, F. G., Wiest, I. C., Kather, J. N., Kambeitz, J., & Mikoláš, P. (2026) · Pharmacopsychiatry · doi:10.1055/a-2816-2869 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Psychological Intervention: Between Illusion and Risk
Izquierdo‐Condoy, J. S., Paz, C., Busch, F., & Ortiz‐Prado, E. (2026) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-026-02381-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Charismatic machines: On the epistemic power of generative AI within platform convergence
Barisione, M. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261441417 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Digital Media Use and Psychosocial Health among Adolescent Boys and Young Men
Nagata, J. M., Low, P., Lee, E. D., Yu, S., Leong, A. W., Bao, K., Wong, J. H., Moreno, M. A., & Lavender, J. M. (2026) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-026-01681-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Current AI chatbot models may reinforce user-provided statements, potentially strengthening maladaptive core beliefs and exacerbating mental health problems [80].”
Buzato, M. E. K., Mestre-Mestre, E. M., de Lima-Lopes, R. E., & Koga, J. (2026) · Corpus Pragmatics · doi:10.1007/s41701-026-00251-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Clinical and theoretical analyses describe a “technological folie à deux ,” in which reciprocal reinforcement between user and system can stabilize or intensify maladaptive beliefs and affective states (Dohnány et al., 2025; Kurth-Nel-son et al., 2025).”
Hollis, A. S. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790586 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yang, Y., Schoenwald, S. K., Moore, J., Ong, D. C., Xun Liu, S., & Hancock, J. T. (2026) · Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798453
Chereches, R. (2026) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/94219
“I’m Right Here With You”: LLMs Using First-Person Language in Therapeutic Interactions
Hastings, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31418-5_26
Abesadze, N., Fernandes, A., & Rubin, E. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.112306
Flaherty, H. B. (2026) · Clinical Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10615-026-01045-9
The case for near-term artificial intelligence risks to be considered a public health problem
Armitage, R. C. (2026) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2026.2716984 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An epistemological study of ‘AI psychosis’
Gan, N. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01281-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…factors include the low explainability of deep-learning-based models [ 17, 54 ], the ability of LLMs to adapt to conversational contexts [ 17], context window size [49 ], hallucination [ 49 ], the tendency for LLMs to give responses that encourage continued con - versation [31, 49], the…”
InfluentialThe paradox of pleasing: therapeutic recognition and the limits of conversational AI
Haber, Y., Refoua, E., Elyoseph, Z., & Yinon, D. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03348-4
A model for “AI”-relevant vulnerability
Conradie, N. H., & Ohlhorst, J. (2026) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-026-00456-2
“One of the features that apparently contributed to the chatbot’s becoming unsafe was the introduction of “memory” i.e. the capacity of the application to draw on information from previous exchanges (Dohnány et al., 2025: 6).”
Schultz, M. D., & Seele, P. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01420-9
“This phenomenon of ‘bidirectional belief amplification’ has recently been described as an increasing public health challenge (AI psychosis), leading individuals to enter their own echo chambers, isolated from corrective social interactions [26].”
An Echo Chamber of One: Should AI Psychosis Be a Distinct Clinical Entity?
Yeung, J. A., Morrin, H., Ng, V., Kraljevic, Z., & Dobson, R. (2026) · arXiv
“The closest analogy in existing psychiatric nosology may be that of a digital folie à deux [35], though even this may not fully capture some of the more unique ways in which interactions with AI agents may influence belief beyond those seen in interactions with other people [5].”
- Authors
- Dohnány, S., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Spens, E., Luettgau, L., Reid, A., Gabriel, I., Summerfield, C., Shanahan, M., & Nour, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2507.19218
- OpenAlex
- W4416408290
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Merton College, University of Oxford
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- AI chatbots, mental illness, sycophancy, in-context learning, emotional support, social isolation, AI safety, AI regulation, cognitive biases, reality testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review