The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of tau proteins in the normal human central and peripheral nervous system.
Abstract
In human brain, antibodies to tau proteins primarily label abnormal rather than normal structures. This might reflect altered immunoreactivity owing to post-mortem proteolysis, disease, or species differences. We addressed this issue by comparing the distribution of tau in bovine and human post-mortem nervous system tissues and in human neural cell lines, using new monoclonal antibodies (MAb) specific for phosphate-independent epitopes in bovine and human tau. In neocortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum, immunoreactive tau was widely expressed but segregated into the axon-neuropil domain of neurons. In spinal cord and peripheral nervous system, tau immunoreactivity was similarly segregated but less abundant. No immunoreactive tau was detected with our MAb in glial cells or in human neural cell lines that express neurofilament or glial filament proteins. Post-mortem delays in tissue denaturation of less than 24 hr did not affect the distribution of tau, but the method used to denature tissues did, i.e., microwave treatment preserved tau immunoreactivity more effectively than chemical fixatives such as Bouin's solution, and formalin-fixed tissue samples reacted poorly with our anti-tau MAb. We conclude that the distribution of tau proteins in human nervous system is similar to that described in perfusion-fixed experimental animals, and that visualization of normal immunoreactive tau in human tissues is critically dependent on the procedures used to denature post-mortem tissue samples. Furthermore, microenvironmental factors in different neuroanatomical sites may affect the regional expression of tau.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sternberger, L. A., & Sternberger, N. H. (1983) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.80.19.6126 · Cited by 1,158
De Camilli, P., Miller, P. E., Navone, F., Theurkauf, W. E., & Vallee, R. B. (1984) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(84)90194-5 · Cited by 381
Kosik, K., & Finch, E. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-10-03142.1987 · Cited by 368
Cited by
Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease
Blennow, K., Hampel, H., Weiner, M., & Zetterberg, H. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.4 · Cited by 1,863
Neuronal α-Synucleinopathy with Severe Movement Disorder in Mice Expressing A53T Human α-Synuclein
Giasson, B. I., Duda, J. E., Quinn, S. M., Zhang, B., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Lee, V. M.-Y. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00682-7 · Cited by 1,266
Self-citationBramblett, G. T., Goedert, M., Jakes, R., Merrick, S. E., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Lee, V. M. Y. (1993) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(93)90057-x · Cited by 903
Self-citationMorris, M., Maeda, S., Vossel, K., & Mucke, L. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.009 · Cited by 899
Phase separation and neurodegenerative diseases: a disturbance in the force
Zbinden, A., Pérez-Berlanga, M., De Rossi, P., & Polymenidou, M. (2020) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.014 · Cited by 500
Metadata
- Authors
- Trojanowski, J. Q., Schuck, T., Schmidt, M. L., & Lee, V. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-215
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2007824057
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.