The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state‐of‐the‐art review
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has evolved rapidly over recent years with the promise to substantially alter and enhance the role of data science in a variety of disciplines. Compared with traditional approaches, ML offers advantages to handle complex problems, provide computational efficiency, propagate and treat uncertainties, and facilitate decision making. Also, the maturing of ML has led to significant advances in not only the main‐stream artificial intelligence (AI) research but also other science and engineering fields, such as material science, bioengineering, construction management, and transportation engineering. This study conducts a comprehensive review of the progress and challenges of implementing ML in the earthquake engineering domain. A hierarchical attribute matrix is adopted to categorize the existing literature based on four traits identified in the field, such as ML method, topic area, data resource, and scale of analysis. The state‐of‐the‐art review indicates to what extent ML has been applied in four topic areas of earthquake engineering, including seismic hazard analysis, system identification and damage detection, seismic fragility assessment, and structural control for earthquake mitigation. Moreover, research challenges and the associated future research needs are discussed, which include embracing the next generation of data sharing and sensor technologies, implementing more advanced ML techniques, and developing physics‐guided ML models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Machine learning for molecular and materials science
Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 · Cited by 4,968 · cited 1×
“Second, an ensemble of different ML algorithms, or similar algorithms with different values for their internal parameters, should be examined to create a more robust overall model (Butler et al., 2018).”
BackgroundA few useful things to know about machine learning
Domingos, P. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2347736.2347755 · Cited by 3,326
Emerging Artificial Intelligence Methods in Structural Engineering
Salehi, H., & Burgueño, R. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.084 · Cited by 1,068
A Big Data Guide to Understanding Climate Change: The Case for Theory-Guided Data Science
Faghmous, J. H., & Kumar, V. (2014) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2014.0026 · Cited by 223 · cited 1×
“As previously investigated in diverse disciplines (Faghmous and Kumar, 2014; Fischer et al., 2006; Wagner and Rondinelli, 2016), theory-guided ML can be developed through a variety of approaches (Karpatne et al., 2017).”
BackgroundTheory-Guided Machine Learning in Materials Science
Wagner, N., & Rondinelli, J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Materials · doi:10.3389/fmats.2016.00028 · Cited by 188 · cited 1×
“As previously investigated in diverse disciplines (Faghmous and Kumar, 2014; Fischer et al., 2006; Wagner and Rondinelli, 2016), theory-guided ML can be developed through a variety of approaches (Karpatne et al., 2017).”
Background
Cited by
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Rahman, J., Ahmed, K. S., Khan, N. I., Islam, K., & Mangalathu, S. (2021) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111743 · Cited by 346
Tapeh, A. T. G., & Naser, M. Z. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09793-w · Cited by 320
AI in structural health monitoring for infrastructure maintenance and safety
Plevris, V., & Papazafeiropoulos, G. (2024) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures9120225 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, Y., Sichani, M. E., Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R.
- Venue
- Earthquake Spectra
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1769-1801
- ISSN
- 1944-8201 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-2930
- OpenAlex
- W3033652307
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 33.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state‐of‐the‐art review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/8755293020919419
- The paper
- Xie, Y., Sichani, M. E., Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2020). The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state‐of‐the‐art review. Earthquake Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.