The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot'
Open accessAbstract
Reicher has recently developed the social identity model of crowd behaviour based on self-categorization theory (SCT). This model begins to tackle the thorny theoretical problems posed by the dynamic nature of crowd action (Reicher, 1996b). The present paper describes an ethnographic study of a crowd event in which there were changes in the inter-group relationships over time. It is suggested that the laboratory evidence in support of SCT is complemented by ethnographic research of this type. By exploring situations in which definitions of context and/or categories are not purposefully manipulated, we can demonstrate the explanatory power of a dynamic and interactive approach to social categorization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceiving people as group members: the role of fit in the salience of social categorizations.
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x · Cited by 509
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (1999) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430299024005 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Cited by
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching Crowds and Power
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x · Cited by 466
Self-citationSubašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308323223 · Cited by 408
The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review
Drury, J. (2018) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948 · Cited by 346
Self-citationThe Psychology of Crowd Dynamics
Reicher, S. (2001) · Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch8 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Stott, C., & Drury, J.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-273
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2162092317
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/a010563
- The paper
- Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot'. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/a010563
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
