The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Utility of Publicly-Available Satellite Imagery for Investigating Looting of Archaeological Sites in Jordan
Abstract
International response to the problem of looting of archaeological sites has been hampered by the difficulty of quantifying the damage done. The scarcity of reliable information negatively impacts professional and public policy making, rendering consensus about the scale of the problem and the effectiveness of policy responses difficult to achieve. We report here on the use of publicly-available satellite imagery for quantifying the damage caused by looting of archaeological sites in Jordan. The ease of use and affordability of imagery such as that provided by Google Earth make the identification, quantification, and monitoring of archaeological site looting possible at a level previously unimagined. Our findings about looting at archaeological sites in Jordan shed light on the potential for a broader application of the method.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Free and publicly available software such as Google Earth and Bing Maps provide satellite images with resolutions down to 61 centimeters.
“Free and publicly available software such as Google Earth and Bing Maps provide satellite images with resolutions down to 61 centimeters [11, 12].”
From Unstructured satellite survey detects up to 20% of archaeological sites in coastal valleys of southern Peru (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- Khairieh K. H., 1996, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 40, 429
- Al-Muheisen Z., 1991, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 35, 341
- 10.2307/3768510 · DOI
- 10.1002/arp.254 · DOI
- Beck A., 2006, Remote Sensing for the Masses?” Antiquity, 80, 308
- Bisheh, G. 2001. “One Damn Illicit Excavation After Another: The Destruction of the Archaeological Heritage of Jordan,” in N. Brodie, J. Doole, and C. Renfrew, eds.Trade in IllicitAntiquities: The Destruction of the World’s ArchaeologicalHeritage. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 115–118.
- Brodie, N., and D. A. Contreras. in press. “The Economics of the Looted Archaeological Site of Mb edh-Dhrd’: A View from Google Earth,” in P. K. Lazrus and A. W. Barker, eds.All the Kings Horses: Looting, Antiquities Trafficking and the Integrity of the Archaeological RecordWashington, D.C.: Society for American Archaeology.
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120551 · DOI · Paper page
- Farchakh-Bajjaly J., 2008, The Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq, 135
- Farchakh-Bajjaly, J. 2008b. “Who Are the Looters at Archaeological Sites in Iraq?” in L. Rothfield, ed.Antiquities Under Seige. Cultural Heritage Protection After the Iraq War. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 49–56.
- 10.1179/lev.1998.30.1.69 · DOI
- 10.1002/arp.181 · DOI
- Frohlich B., 1982, Annual of the Department of Antiquities, Amman, Jordan, 26, 249
- Glueck N., 1951, The Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 25, iii
- Hritz C., 2008, TAARH Newsletter, 3, 1
- Jones R. E., 2000, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 44, 523
- Kennedy D., 1996, AARG News, 12, 11
- 10.1179/lev.1998.30.1.91 · DOI
- Kennedy D., 2003, Newsletter of the Council for British Research in the Levant, 2003, 4
- 10.1017/S0003598X00098094 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11759-007-9013-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1469605308095007 · DOI
- Lapp P. W., 1966, Archaeology, 19, 104
- 10.2307/1356126 · DOI
- 10.3406/syria.2001.7729 · DOI
- McCreery D. W., 1996, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 40, 51
- MacDonald, B. 1988.The Wadi el Hasa Archaeological Survey 1979-1983, West-Central Jordan. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
- MacDonald B., 1997, Studies in the History and Archaeology of Jordan, 6, 93
- MacDonald B., 1987, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 31, 391
- Mattingly D., 2007, Archaeology and Desertification: The Wadi Faynan Landscape Survey, 305
- Newnham D., 1996, Guardian Weekend, 7, 70
- Ortner, D. J., and B. Fröhlich. 2008.The Early Bronze Age I Tombs and Burials of Bab adh-Dhrd, Jordan, Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
- Palmer C., 2007, Archaeology and Desertification: The Wadi Faynan Landscape Survey, 25
- Palumbo G., 1993, Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, 183
- Papadopoulos T. J., 2001, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 45, 189
- 10.1179/009346907791071773 · DOI
- Parcak, S. 2009.Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology. London: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
- Politis K. D., 1994, Minerva, 5, 12
- Politis K. D., 1998, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 42, 611
- Politis K. D., 1998, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 42, 627
- Politis, K. D. 1999. “The Nabataean Cemetery at Khirbet Qazone,”Near Eastern Archaeology62 (2): 128. · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203165461_chapter_14 · DOI
- Politis K. D., 2007, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 51, 199
- Politis K. D., 2005, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 49, 313
- Rast W. E., 1974, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 19, 5
- Rast, W. E., and R. T. Schaub. 1978. “A Preliminary Report of Excavations at Bab adh-Dhra’, 1975” in D. N. Freedman, ed.Preliminary Excavation Reports: Bab adh-Dhra’, Sardis, Meiron, Tell el-Hesi, Carthage (Punic). Cambridge, MA: American Schools of Oriental Research, 1–32.
- 10.2307/3768562 · DOI
- 10.2307/1356536 · DOI
- Rees L. W. B., 1929, Antiquity, 3, 389
- Roosevelt, C. H., and C. Luke. 2006a. “Looting Lydia. The Destruction of an Archaeological Landscape in Western Turkey,” in N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, and K. W. Tubb, eds.Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 173–187.
- 10.1179/009346906791072061 · DOI
- Rose J. C., 2004, Culture Without Context, 14, 4
- Rucker, J. 2007. “A Diocletianic Roman Castellum in its Local Context: A Final Report of the 2001 Da’Janiya Survey,” unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia.
- Saturno, W., T. L. Sever, D. E. Irwin, B. F. Howell, and T. G. Garrison. 2007. “Putting Us on the Map: Remote Sensing Investigation of the Ancient Maya Landscape,” in J. R. Wiseman and F. El-Baz, eds.Remote Sensing in Archaeology. Springer: New York, 137–160. · DOI
- Schaub R. T., 1993, The New Encyclopaedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land
- Schaub R. T., 2008, The Early Bronze Age I Tombs and Burials of Bab adh-Dhra’, Jordan, 25
- Schaub R. T., 2009, Crossing Jordan-North American Contributions to the Archaeology of Jordan, 245
- 10.2307/1357031 · DOI
- 10.2307/209524 · DOI
- Smith A. M., 1994, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 38, 469
- 10.2307/1357745 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00096496 · DOI
- 10.1007/0-387-44455-6_21 · DOI
- Thomas D. C., 2008, AARG News 37 (September 2008), 22
- 10.1017/S0003598X00061391 · DOI
- Ur J., 2006, SAA Archaeological Record, 6, 35
- 10.2307/506070 · DOI
- Waheeb M., 1995, Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 39, 553
- 10.1002/gea.20136 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Snyder, T. J., & Haas, R. (2024) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292272 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Contreras, D. A., & Brodie, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-114
- ISSN
- 0093-4690
- 2042-4582
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review