Cited by 41Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural HeritageCultural Heritage Management and Preservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building a Working-Class Archaeology: The Colorado Coal Field War Project

McGuire, Randall H., Reckner, Paul·2003·Industrial Archaeology Review

Abstract

To characterise maternal demographics, obstetric risk factors and neonatal outcomes associated with term category 1 caesarean sections (CS).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/030907203786281680

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGuire, R. H., & Reckner, P.
Venue
Industrial Archaeology Review
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
83-95
ISSN
  • 0309-0728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-8196
OpenAlex
W2011748666
Cited by
40
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Archaeology Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Denver
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Keywords
coal mining, labor history, coal miners, industrial archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review