The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 13 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China
Open accessAbstract
(1993). Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China. Journal of Chinese Religions: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 13-44.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
99 Own interpretation · 58 No basis given · 21 Own result · 13 Sources not found · 8 Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wan:yong zhengzong (Correct source for a myriad of uses) is a popular encyclopedia pub, lished in Fujian in 1599.) 8 The book is valuable for being the only surviving example of this genre to include a chapter on institutional religions, entitled Sengdao men”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu argues that Buddhism and Taoism are useful adjuncts to kingly rule, for they can persuade the igno' rant, who would otherwise be unmoved by Confucian appeals to goodness.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At least as early as the third century, Buddhists were obliged to fight against indigenous challenges for the right of the new religion to have a place within the old.They did so by speaking in terms of its commonalities with Taoism and Confucianism.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Precise dating for the first appearance of these phrases has not been determined, but none of them can be attested before the Yuan dynasty.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is in the Yuan dynasty that we find the first attempts to narrate the interactive relation, ship among the Three Teachings.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Between the middle of the sixteenth century and the second quarter of the seven~ teenth, the monks at Upper Tianzhu constructed no fewer than five halls of worship to non~Buddhist deities on the monastery's grounds.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Liu Mi, in a subsequently influ .. ential essay of 1324, asserts that”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Liu Mi
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The association of the three belonging to a common cate, gory had come into being prior to the Tang dynasty”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The essay, entitled Sanjioo tun (On the Three Teachings),'8 restates the argument of Liu Mi that each teaching is best suited to a particular clientele and that none can therefore be dispensed with.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Liu Mi
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SlOne finds this sort of argument being made by Qing observers.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 75
- It may state two separate claims as one. 81
- The quote only partly states this claim. 6
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Jiao concluded that”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Popular texts from the late sixteenth century through to the nineteenth, produced by lesser literati for an audience even less schooled than themselves, evince much less anxi, ety about crossing sect boundaries and much greater willingness to let the platitudes and models of one spill over to the next.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the notion of lithe unity of the Three Teachings”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1703, Abbot Yuanjie built the main hall at Nanchan Cloister.The chief statue was an imposing south~facing Buddha.His attendant, wielding sword and shield, was Guan Yu, the God of War.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A local Confucian resolved the affront by paying to have Guan Yu removed to a sepa~ rate chamber on the east side of the hall.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As for the elite, however, Jiao was critical of those who sought to”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among elite Qing intellectuals, that project was effectively dead.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > 29
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although Deqing sought to demonstrate that concepts among the Three Teachings par' alleled each other, like Li Zhi, he set one creed above the others.As he put it, IIBuddhism is the one highest vehicle.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without this kind of concession to the religious tastes of the common people, he reasoned, no one would come to the monaster~ ies.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significantly, I think, it was into the chapter on Buddhism and Taoism, rather than into the chapter on popular practice, that the publisher chose to insert a set of short passages on the unity of the Three Teachings.40 The short texts he included speak only of the common content of the Three Teachings, following the Taizhou intellectual fashion of the 15905, and d~not propose a radical merging of”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Roughly contemporary with The Correct Source for a Myriad of Uses is an album of pic .. tures and short texts depicting deities and famous people entitled Sanjiao yuanliu soushen daquan (Compendium for seeking the gods in terms of the histories of the Three Teachings).The original work dates from the Yuan dynasty, but the phrase”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magistrate approved, though he said that if he could have had his way, he would have removed the Buddha statue and converted the cloister into a shrine consecrated solely to Guan Yu.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chongfu Monastery was located just outside one of the city gates of Hangzhou.Its entrance was dominated by Emperor Guan's Hall, honoring the popular God of War.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A Japanese visitor to China in the 19JOs was surprised by the shrines to non~Buddhist deities he found in Buddhist monasteries, attributing them to a pragmatic attitude on the part of the monks.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After offering a prayer to the God of War, the visitor would draw a numbered bamboo tally from a jar and then pay the monk attendant for the match .. ing numbered slip of paper on which a fortune was written out.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it annoyed the local magistrate, who imputed opportunistic motives to Yuanjie”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The prefect ordered that the Buddha statue be moved out of the hall and into a side chamber.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most references to Three Teachings Halls are too brief to permit analysis of the forms of worship they hosted.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Lin states unambiguously that his purpose in using the concept is lito Confucianize the Taoists and Buddhists, and broaden Confucianism to its fullest extent,”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“willing to acknowledge the teach, ings' commonalities but recognizing at the same time that they proposed fundamentally different orientations.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The statue of Confucius had been brought in from a side,hall, to which the demoted officials were relegated; those of Lao Zi and the Buddha appear to have come from outside the shrine.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Butthey are widely reported in sources only as of the sixteenth century, when magistrates began to discover them existing independently of Buddhist monasteries.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magistrate ordered that the worshippers return the two original statues of the officials to their places and move the Three Sages elsewhere.In his record of the matter, he noted that his order was unpopular.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The novel ends with the building of a Three Teachings Hall, sponsored by the local lay elite but carried out, according to the novelist, with the cooperation of the entire community.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Fictional sources such as Xu jinpingmei and The Romance of the Three Teachings reliably convey actual social practice and community involvement in joint worship.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many predate it; for instance, gongsheng Lu Guangchai (1535,80) built a Three Teachings Hall in Pinghu county, Zhejiang, in the 15708, well before the cult had taken fonn.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A fuller description of a Three Teachings Hall comes from a fictional source, chapter 37 of Xu jinpingmei, the mid .. seventeenth .. century sequel to the erotic novel, Golden Lotus.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, at exactly the same time as the Yichuan case, another Shaanxi magistrate was dismayed to discover a Three Teachings Hall within his jurisdiction.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another memorial in 1836 refers to Three Teachings Halls in two northern provinces and again requests imperial proscription.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“lito cause the Taoists and Buddhists to return to Confucianism.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Yet he goes on in the same passage to criticize IIthose scholars of the present age who overlook the basic incompatibility between Confucian and non, Confucian goals of cultivation.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ming thinkers who used Neo,Confucianism•to embrace Buddhism and Taoism were simply muddled.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The absence of testimony regarding the motives people had to combine the Three Sages pre~ vents a definitive answer to this question.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The memorialist wanted these practices ended, the statues of Confucius removed to local schools or Confucian temples, and the halls converted into conventional monasteries.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The gazetteer of Liangxiang county, just south of Beijing, indicates that the Three Teachings Hall there dated back at least to the seventeenth century, when it was occupied by a Taoist by the name of True Man Wang.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yu recognized that the three traditions cannot escape what their historical unfolding had made them; hence their differences were not inconsequential.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For Huang, Buddhism and Taoism were lesser teachings whose contents could be entirely embraced by the truths espoused by Confucianism and enshrined in the Six Classics.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Powerful testimony to the strength of the Three Teachings Halls in north China comes from a memorial of 1744 from Henan province, which calls for their suppression.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And many were located outside Jiangnan and the southeast.Indeed, most of the references I have been able to find to these halls come from the north.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The memorialist testi .. fies that these halls housed the statues of the Buddha, Lao Zi, and Confucius, which were jointly worshipped by the men and women living in the vicinity of the hall.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Qianlong emperor issued an edict against the building of Three Teachings Halls in response to the 1744 memorial; later memori~ als of suppression were also endorsed by the court.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The best, like Wang Yangming, reinterpreted what they found in Buddhism in terms of the higher revelations given in the Confucian tradition”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“declaring it and Buddhism to be as incompatible lias ice and ash.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites J6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The anony~ mous author in his own preface takes a similar tack, deploring that students of Buddhism and Taoism had come to outnumber students of Confucianism ten to one.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Confucianism is the only teaching needed to nurture good rulership above and stability below.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaindirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is uninter~ ested in their fonnal boundaries”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The fragments Huang Yupian preserved are representative of the precious scroll's overall treatment of the Three Teachings.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To resolve the conflict, a Three Teachings Hall was built on the convent grounds and adherents of each teaching were given equal time to lecture in the hall.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“willing to combine the three without worrying about doing violence to their original forms.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The fragments Huang Yupian preserved are representative of the precious scroll's overall treatment of the Three Teachings.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The same was true of state~cult and, less frequently, Taoist sites.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A text that sits uneasily between popular sectarian belief and elite orthodoxy is Shengxue tonglun (Basic treatises on the learning of the sages), a work of eclectic philosophy pre~ served in an 1854 edition.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“declares in an opening notice that he was at first unwilling to read the manuscript because he saw it was full of phrases like”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“others, like Wang Ji, became indistinguishable from Buddhists.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“creatively indifferent to received traditions”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The fragments Huang Yupian preserved are representative of the precious scroll's overall treatment of the Three Teachings.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Buddhist monasteries of any size invariably housed non~Buddhist deities, and sometimes included separate shrines to them.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The statue of Confucius was placed in the center of the triumvirate, so Ding says, to indicate the orthodoxy of Confucianism and the heterodoxy of the other two teachings.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Huang argues that the fundamental difference between the intellectual systems of Confucianism and other teachings is that only the former provides the knowledge of how to govem.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the fragments Huang preserves, it seems that the precious scroll does not respect Huang's distinctions among the sanjiao and treats the three as inherently the same.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The fragments Huang Yupian preserved are representative of the precious scroll's overall treatment of the Three Teachings.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He is unambiguous in his avowal of allegiance to the Confucian tradition, though, suspiciously, he takes the Book of Changes rather than the Analects as its highest manifestation.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His goal, he insists, is to rescue the essential truth from which the three traditions started but which they have all subsequently lost.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Devotional practice had become quite eclectic by the Ming dynasty”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“not only did Zhucheng have a Three Teachings Hall, but Ding purchased it for his private study in 1633!”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although joint worship is a religious practice characteristic of China, to my knowledge, it has gone almost unrecognized and certainly unanalyzed.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wang Yangming (1472,1529) is often credited with nourishing a syncretic impulse within late,Ming Neo,Confucians.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though yoking Guan Yu for service to the Buddha was already a well~established convention by the Ming”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it does indicate that the worship of a Buddhist deity did not preclude the worship of other deities.It was accepted that both could occur.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It remained to the most synthetically minded of late,Ming thinkers, Lin Zhaoen (1517,98), to con, sider their intersubstitutability.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > 29
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The joint representation of figures associated with all Three Teachings conveys the impres .. sion that all three are similar vehicles for the same purpose, for all are equally conse .. crated to the task of instructing people in goodness.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His largely illiterate audience, whose eclectic religious consciousness led them to regard all the figures in the portraits-from Confucius to the Jade Emperor-as deities, shen, working for goodness and justice and equally available for supplication in time of need, would have agreed with this view.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The audience of the Compendium was largely illiterate.
In the paper
“Edward Ch'ien has expressed this idea by observing that for ]iao Hong, the Three Teachings were”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > 29
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Edward Ch'ien
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That the Three Teachings have in common the pursuit of a Way that does not vary with the pursuit is the great ecumenical vision of Chinese religion.It is rooted in the recognition that the teachings are historically and philosophically distinct systems of thought that have accommodated and complemented, but cannot be used to replace, each other.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > 29
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The solution was thus the same as in the previous case: the physical separation of the objects of worship, with pride of place to the principal deity for which the place of worship had originally been built (and whose cult in this case the state directly supported).”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What Tao provides instead is a set of three tables of concepts mapping out logical structures for each of the teachings.”
- Also stated in: § THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY · plain
“The structures of the chans are identical, but their terminologies do not overlap.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This creative new formulation of a kind of unity among the Three Teachings in the Yuan dynasty did not derive directly from Mongol interests; but it may have been shaped by them”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Mongol emperors regarded all three teachings as equally foreign and were less willing to exclude one in favor of another.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The term condominium connotes that the Three Teachings lived together in late' imperial China with a considerable degree of harmony: equal in principle, equally available to worshippers, and free to associate and interact in a multitude of ways.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > University of Toronto
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As Jonathan Haeger has argued, Neo~Confucianism succeeded through its interaction with Buddhism to rob the latter of its influence over the elite.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Jonathan Haeger
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the state's recognition of Buddhism as a non,heterodox religion, however, the magistrate could not have his way.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The state's recognition of Buddhism as non-heterodox was sufficient to prevent a local magistrate from removing a Buddha statue.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Presumably he was meeting opposition, certainly from Yuanjie, probably also from the people who had subscribed to the building of the hall in the first place, and perhaps also from those who worshipped at the cloister.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Editor Yu Xiangdou distinguished orthodox and popular in this fashion, out of deference to the elite convention of separating the world of formal, politically legitimate religious undertakings from the world of informal religious activities which was ever vulnerable to the charge of heterodoxy.He does not, however, go so far as to exclude the latter from consideration, which I take to be evidence”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The compiler of The Compendium for Seeking the Gods has not syncretically combined the Three Teachings in the album; but he has woven them together in a way that sug.. gests an indifference to doctrinal distinctions.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The”
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Ordinary people were chiefly concerned with gaining assistance from deities rather than with doctrinal unity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their content and editorial arrangement suggest that the unity of the Three Teachings was regarded as an issue of concern principally to the intellectuals and did not speak to the common peo, pie.It belonged to the organic world of organized religion and defined doctrine, not to the mechanical world of everyday piety.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The emperor's essay reads more as a statement of ecumenical toleration than as a blue' print for syncretism.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Liu's view is ecumeni, cal rather than syncretic.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But they were explicitly san (”
- Also stated in: § Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China · plain
“three”
- Also stated in: § THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY · plain
“To the degree that each defined itself in relation to the other two, it did so antithetically.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS INTO THE YUAN DYNASTY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reconciliation is hard to achieve; or, to put it more bluntly, syncretism, as I am conceiving of it, rarely happens.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > University of Toronto
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Logical contradictions inevitably arise between distinct religious systems.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inclusivist in his intention, Deqing fell back on a compartmentalist model to explain his own career, saying that he came to Buddhism through a progressive study first of Confucianism, then Taoism.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By this time the Qing state had raised Guan Yu to the rank of emperor and was in the process of elevating his cult on a par with that of Confucius.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The image is literally compartmentalist.”
- Also stated in: § THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING · plain
“Wang, however, was committed to overcoming that com, partmentalization and establishing an inclusivist vision that was sympathetic to Buddhism and Taoism but accorded Neo,Confucianism the higher place.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § THE UNITY OF THE THREE TEACHINGS IN THE MING · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Suppression was not thorough, how~ ever, since many local gazetteers continued to record the presence of Three Teachings Halls even after calls for their suppression.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The least we can say is that the halls housed the Buddhist~Taoist~Confucian condominium more snugly than any other late~ imperial religious institution.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The very con~ cept seems to assume an imperative for doctrinal purity more appropriate to a religion like Christianity that is based on revelation, policed by a church hierarchy, and doctri~ nally unsympathetic to ecumenical interaction.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their joint worship suggests a condominium, a living together of the Three Teachings in Chinese religious life, not their merging and reconciliation.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the spread of the Three Teachings Halls from the mid~Ming forward occurred in tandem with the tendency of the Three Teachings to be drawn together intellectually, I would argue that the greater impulse for joining the Three Sages in worship derived from below and reflected a grow~ ing popular desire to tap the resources of all three.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“My impression is that the collocation of the three statues signals mutuality rather than syncretism.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Passionate thinkers like Li Zhi or Lin Zhaoen invoked sanjiao heyi formulations to challenge the narrow academic orthodoxy of their peers and shake them into realizing that the goal of learning was self-understanding, not self-promotion.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, I suspect that intellectuals among the people would not have infused sectarian thought with syncretic conventions intended to challenge the hegemony of the established religions.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Combination appears not to have disturbed worshippers; in fact, it would seem that combination was regarded as enhancing the efficacy of the deities.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither Lin Zhaoen nor Li Zhi is representative of mainstream Ming Neo~Confucian thinking on the subject of the Three Teachings.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was only down in the sectarian world that those visions might have actually merged into one.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Confucianism remains the highest teaching and dominates the unity in which the other two teachings must converge.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Joint worship was a matter of improving efficacy, increasing human odds against the universe.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, joint worship was sufficiently popular to induce the people of one county to support thirty~eight halls, and the people of another to alter the arrangement of statuary in a state~cult shrine in favor of joint worship.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to the terms of this essay, it is arguable whether either of them understood the Three T eaehings in a way that was truly syncretic.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Joint worship offended magisterial maglstra t 'ons about the good order of religious institutions.That way lay heterodoxy and expecta 1 .the ill,defined threat of subversion that heterodoxy implied to the state.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If joint worship did not dissolve the houndaries among the three, it regarded them as insignificant in the cosmic order of things.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The focus of his inquiry was the cult of Lin Zhaoen, who preached the joint worship of the Three Sages in Fujian and whose influence spread throughout the region.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At one level, Lin Zhaoen's goal was total synthesis.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the Three Teachings were distinct, they were far from exclusive; as such, they were better able to mingle without having to merge, to coexist in an ecumenical environment rather than reconcile their differences.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, it implies that the Three Sages were regarded as having powers that exceeded”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shigematsu believed that the Three Teachings Halls were mostly found in central and south China.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If joint worship falls short of syncretism, it rests nonetheless on a social base of believers for whom syncretism was a natural tendency.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The philosophers proved incapable of devising formulations that went much beyond the basic idea that, while the truth may be absolute, the visions through which it can be glimpsed remain relative.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They were eclec~ tic in their borrowings of gestures and language, ecumenical in their toleration of other teachings, but incl~ivist in their belief that Confucianism stood as the highest repre~ sentation of truth.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In an essay published in 1939, Shigematsu Shunsho traced the origin of such halls to the Song dynasty, when some Buddhist monasteries built them as conces, sions to popular taste.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was a way of shaping given traditions to evolving devotional ends and transcending the compartments into which the elite theorized the Three Teachings, as well as transcending the political order which dictated the distinctions among them.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The same impression is conveyed in a fictional source from the early seventeenth century, The Romance of the Three Teachings, which betrays the influence of Lin Zhaoen.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Fictional sources such as Xu jinpingmei and The Romance of the Three Teachings reliably convey actual social practice and community involvement in joint worship.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But the urge to combine the deities from different teach, ings could be carried further, greatly to the distress of the state.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > THE THREE TEACHINGS IN MING,QING POPULAR TEXTS
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Popular belief made this challenge not only possible but powerful.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > SYNCRETISM AND CHINESE RELIGION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each was present to ensure that his particular religious tradition could be drawn on in the struggle to enlist the aid of the gods against the hostile elements of everyday life.Yet each remained distinct.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Until we discover more about the beliefs and intentions motivating the patronage of Three Teachings Halls, we will have to stop short of declaring joint~worship syncretism.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seventeenth'century intellectuals would not concede even this much common ground to the Three Teachings.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First of all, it is apparent that joint worship was carried out in many places throughout China, both in the economic heanland of the Yangzi Valley and in the less developed regions of the north.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > I
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet there is a strong sense in the writing that the three are syncretically intersubstitutable”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sectarian view of religion would thus appear to be interested in a radical synthesis of the Three Teachings.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The fragments Huang Yupian preserved are representative of the precious scroll's overall treatment of the Three Teachings.
In the paper
“Having no obligation to observe the doctrinal exclusiveness that orthodox Confucians felt was essential to the ideological structure of elite rule, folk religion was free to be”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and that pride of place is given to Confucianism to disguise what the state might evalu~ ate as a subversive tendency in the author's thinkinJZ.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The author's assertion that”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although joint worship is a religious practice characteristic of China, to my knowledge, it has gone almost unrecognized and certainly unanalyzed.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite these extravagant protestations, intended perhaps to protect the book from pro~ scription, Basic Treatises on the Learning of the Sages is at heart an ecumenical, perhaps even syncretic, book.”
§ Rethinking Syncretism: The Unity of the Three Teachings and their Joint Worship in Late-Imperial China > An earlier version
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Logical contradictions inevitably arise between distinct religious systems.
“Given the inevitability of logical contradictions arising between one system and another, this disso' nance naturally resists its disappearance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The audience of the Compendium was largely illiterate.
“His largely illiterate audience, whose eclectic religious consciousness led them to regard all the figures in the portraits-from Confucius to the Jade Emperor-as deities, shen, working for goodness and justice and equally available for supplication in time of need, would have agreed with this view.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ordinary people were chiefly concerned with gaining assistance from deities rather than with doctrinal unity.
“Among ordinary people, the chief concern was, more simply, how to gain assistance from the deities populating heaven and earth.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Mongol emperors regarded all three teachings as equally foreign and were less willing to exclude one in favor of another.
“The Mongols regarded all three as equally foreign teachings.”
“the Mongol emperors were less willing to exclude one in favor of any other.”
The paper relies on this without support.
If contemporary texts do not mention that non-Buddhist worship halls in Buddhist monasteries were inappropriate, then such halls were not considered inappropriate.
“Once again, there is absolutely no indication in contemporary texts that these halls of worship for non~ Buddhist figures were inappropriately sited in a Buddhist monastery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fictional sources such as Xu jinpingmei and The Romance of the Three Teachings reliably convey actual social practice and community involvement in joint worship.
“The same impression is conveyed in a fictional source from the early seventeenth century, The Romance of the Three Teachings, which betrays the influence of Lin Zhaoen.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The state's recognition of Buddhism as non-heterodox was sufficient to prevent a local magistrate from removing a Buddha statue.
“Given the state's recognition of Buddhism as a non,heterodox religion, however, the magistrate could not have his way.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The fragments Huang Yupian preserved are representative of the precious scroll's overall treatment of the Three Teachings.
“From the fragments Huang preserves, it seems that the precious scroll does not respect Huang's distinctions among the sanjiao and treats the three as inherently the same.”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Judith Berling, The S,ncretic Religion of Un Chao~en (New York: Columbia University Press, 1980), p. 9.
- Gavin O'Costa, Theology and Religious Pluralism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), especially chap~ ter 3 on exclusivism and chapter 4 on inclusivism.
- For an interpretation of compartmentalism as a type of syncretism, see Edward Ch'ien, Chiao HlD\g and the RestrUCturing of Neo..confucianism in the Uue Ming (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986),pp. 117ff.
- Thomas Selover. "San..chiao: Religious Dimensions of Pacific Culture," in Religion in the Pacific Era, ed. Frank Ainn and Typer Hendricks (Paragon, 1985), pp. 102, 106, translates the phrase as "harmonization of the Three Teachings." While this rendering captures the intent of many intel~ lectuals who sought to demonstrate the mutuality of the Three Teachings, it falls shon of the full implication of he)i, which I read literally as combining or joining together to become one thing.
- Yalen Sargent, "Tchou Hi contre Ie Boudhisme," M~langes publ;is par "Instirue ~s Hauces Etudes Chinoises, vol. 1, pp. 1#156.
- Wm. Theodore de Bary, Neo--Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind#and~Heart (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981), pp. 130#31.
- The struggles at court are summarized in Liu Ts'un~yen and Judith Berling, "The • Three Teachings' in the Mongol#Yuan Period," in Yuan Thought, ed. W.T. de Bary and Hok~lam Chan (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982), pp. 4~90. They too maintain that the Mongol conquest encouraged an unprecedented Minterflow of the ideas of the Three Teachings," though they regard the outcome of that flow as syncretism; see p. 479.
- Rao Zongyi, "Sanjiao lun yu Song Jin xueshuo" (The theory of the Three Teachings and Song# Jin scholarship), Don,xi wenhua, no. 11 (May 1968), p. 27; Liu Mi. SDnjioo pinpin lam (Viewing the Three Teachings with a balanced mind), LinI.ang mishi congslw (1888 edition), lIb;
- The tripod formula is an old one going back to at least the Tang. See Shigematsu ShunshQ "Shina sank-yoshi jo no jakan no mandai," Shien, no. 21 (July 1939), p. 135. For its use in the scrip- tures of the Luo sect in the late Ming, see Daniel Ovennyer, Folk Buddhist ReUgion: Dissenting Sects in Lace Imperial China (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976), p. 134.
- The passage in which Wang uses this metaphor is translated in Liu Ts'un-yen, "Taoist Self- Cultivation in Ming Thought," in Self and Society in Ming Thought, ed. W.T. de Bary (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968), pp. 317•18.
- Confucianism, ed. W. T. de Bary (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), pp. 43-48.
- Jiao Hong, Zhiran (Extraneous talk), thong, 6a, in Baoyan rang riliji (Private files from Baoyan Hall), ed. Chen Jiru (Wanli era), vol. 83.
- Li Zhi, Xu feruhu (A continuation of A Book co be Burned) (l618; repro Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 1975), pp. 75-76; see also p.
- For a brief commentary on this essay, see W.T. de Bary, "Individualism and Humanitarianism in Late Ming Thought," in his Self and Societ, in Ming Thought, pp. 210-11.
- Jiao Hong, Zhiran, shang, la-b, 4a-5a; translated in pan in Ch'i~n, Chiao Hung, p. 88. 30. Ch'ien, Chiao Hung, pp. 120, 180.
- Yu Shenxing, Gushan bichen (Notes on everyday maners from Gushan) (repr. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju, 1984), pp. 200-201.
- Huang Zongxi, "Zhang Ren'an xiansheng mu zhiming" (Epitaph for the tomb of Master Zhang Ren'an), Nanlei wending (repr. Taibei: Shijie Shuju, 1964), houji, p. 53. This passage is examined more closely in my Praying for Power: Buddhism and the Formation of Gentry Soder, in Late .. Ming China (Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies. Harvard University, 1993), ch. 2.
- Appended to liu Mi, Sanjiao pingxin fun in the LinJang mishi congshu edition.
- Methods for controlling illness are reserved for the subsequent chapter (juan 41), entitled Fabingmen.
- Ye Dehui, ed., Sanjiao,..anliu soushm ddquan (1909). A Yuan edition of Sowhm guangji is men- tioned in the catalogue of the library of Mao Jin (J igu Ge). Sakai, Chuaolw tmslao, pp. 299-300, dis- cusses this book in relation to syncretism without specifying the nature of the syncretism or social base it might represent.
- Evelyn Rawski and James Watson (Berkeley: Univenity of California Press, 1985), pp. 219-54.
- Concerning Huang Yupian, see Overmyer, Folic Buddhist Religion, pp. 29 ..32.
- Huang Yupian, Pam xian&bian. reprinted in Qingshi tiJiao, no. 3 (1982), pp. 2()..21, 122.
- Regarding sectarian constructions of alternative Ilfictions" of hegemony, see Kobayashi Kazumi, "Ideology and the Road to Rebellion: The Other Side of Rent' and Tax,Resistance Struggles," in Suue and Society in Late Imperial China, ed. Linda Grove and Christian Daniels (Tokyo: University of Tole yo Press, 1984), pp. 215,43.
- Shang tianthu jiangsi thi (Gazetteer of Upper Tianzhu Monastery) (1646), 8.2b,3b. Regarding the "three officials" of the second shrine, it bears noting that the Sanguan jing (Three officials' c1as, sic) was one of the two most commonly recited Taoist texts in the late' imperial period; see Richard Smith, China's Cultural Heritage: The Ch'ing Dynasty (Boulder: Westview Press, 1983), p. 142.
- Berling, Syncretic Religion, pp. 225,26, mentions two shrines built in 1590 and 1602.
- Wang Ji, "Sanjiao tang W'; see also his Wang Lcmgxi xiansheng quanji, 20.76a,b. The county gazetteer notes a Three,in,One Chapel (Sanyi An), which mayor may nor refer ro Lu's hall; see Pinghu xianvu (1790), 10.54b, citing rhe 1689 edition.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vuong, Q., Bui, Q.-K., La, V., Vuong, T., Nguyen, V.-H. T., Ho, M., Nguyen, H. T., & Ho, T. M. (2018) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0189-2 · Cited by 449
“At the same time, Brook (1993) makes a valid point on not letting the concept of syncretism “monopolize the full range of possible mixings that occur between distinct religions in a religiously plural society.””
BackgroundThe Cambridge History of China
(1979) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521214469 · Cited by 332
The Cambridge History of China
Twitchett, D. C., & Mote, F. W. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339 · Cited by 151
Falun Gong and the Future of China
Ownby, D. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.001.0001 · Cited by 129
Sino-Korean tributary relations under the Ming
Clark, D. N. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.007 · Cited by 82
A History of Early Modern Southeast Asia, 1400–1830
Andaya, B. W., & Andaya, L. Y. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139051323 · Cited by 78
The socio-economic development of rural China during the Ming
Heijdra, M. J. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.011 · Cited by 71
"Confucianism" in Vietnam: A State of the Field Essay
Kelley, L. C. (2006) · Journal of Vietnamese Studies · doi:10.1525/vs.2006.1.1-2.314 · Cited by 65
Brook, T. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.012 · Cited by 51
Self-citationKim, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.001.0001 · Cited by 42
Ming foreign relations: Southeast Asia
Gungwu, W. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.008 · Cited by 36
Ming China and the emerging world economy, c. 1470–1650
Atwell, W. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.010 · Cited by 34
Confucian learning in late Ming thought
Peterson, W. J. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.013 · Cited by 33
The Ming fiscal administration
Huang, R. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.004 · Cited by 31
Chün-fang, Y. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.016 · Cited by 31
Hucker, C. O. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.003 · Cited by 27
Confucian culture and corporate bond pricing
Zhai, L., & Tang, X. (2022) · China Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100285 · Cited by 24
Relations with maritime Europeans, 1514–1662
Wills, J. E. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.009 · Cited by 24
The Hearth and the Temple: Mapping Female Religiosity in Late Imperial China, 1550-1900
Yiqun, Z. (2003) · Late imperial China · doi:10.1353/late.2004.0005 · Cited by 19
New Trends in the Historiography of Christianity in China
Standaert, N. (1997) · The Catholic Historical Review · doi:10.1353/cat.1997.0178 · Cited by 18
Learning from Heaven: the introduction of Christianity and other Western ideas into late Ming China
Peterson, W. J. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.014 · Cited by 15
Religious atmosphere, seismic impact, and corporate charitable donations in China
Huang, R., Shi, Y., Li, D., Wang, S., & Jia, Z. (2024) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107369 · Cited by 14
Rossabi, M. (2014) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004285293_008 · Cited by 14
The Invention of Japanese Religions
Storm, J. Â. J. (2011) · Religion Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2011.00307.x · Cited by 12
Vermeersch, S. (2020) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel11050231 · Cited by 11
“Many Korean scholars have argued that the term, as used by Choe Chiweon, denotes a native religious tradition, but there is very little evidence to back this up. compartmentalism—where each has its own field of specialization without much overlap or interchange (Brook 1993a, p. 15).”
BackgroundTaylor, R. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.015 · Cited by 10
Cultural Additivity TheoryPreprint
Vuong, Q., Nguyen, M., Jin, R., La, V., & Le, T.-T. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xuv3s · Cited by 10
Despeux, C., & Pettit, J. E. E. (2018) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004383456 · Cited by 9
“See Brook 1993: 13–44.”
Artisans, Athletes, Entrepreneurs, and other Skilled Exemplars of the Way [1]
Stewart, A., Lee, F. K., & Konz, G. N. P. (2008) · Journal of Management Spirituality & Religion · doi:10.1080/14766080809518688 · Cited by 9
Rossabi, M. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.006 · Cited by 8
Shantang : Charitable Temples in China, Singapore, and Malaysia
Chee‐Beng, T. (2012) · Asian Ethnology · Cited by 8
Santangelo, P. E. (2022) · Ming Studies · doi:10.1080/0147037x.2021.1991719 · Cited by 7
Violence in Chinese Religious Traditions
Shahar, M. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199759996.013.0009 · Cited by 7
Langlois, J. D. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.005 · Cited by 7
Spiritual State, Material Temple: The Political Economy of Religious Revival in China
Chang, K.-M. (2016) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8sn097k · Cited by 6
Chi, S., & Liu, C. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02977-8 · Cited by 6
“In The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenom-enology (1936/1976), Husserl introduced the concept of “ life-world ” as a critique of positive science in order to both transcend objective science and positivism while also accounting for human consciousness and lived experiences.”
InfluentialBerling, J. A. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.017 · Cited by 6
Santangelo, P. E. (2019) · Entangled Religions · doi:10.46586/er.10.2019.8408 · Cited by 5
“Harmony in Diversity”: A Compartmentalist Approach to the Three Teachings in Mulianxi
Zhao, X. (2021) · Ecumenica · doi:10.5325/ecumenica.14.1.0015 · Cited by 5
Canaris, D. (2024) · Intellectual History Review · doi:10.1080/17496977.2024.2359498 · Cited by 4
Huynh, N. T., Thomas, A., & To, V. T. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2722-1.ch019 · Cited by 4
Klein, T. (2011) · Religion · doi:10.1080/0048721x.2011.624694 · Cited by 4
Religious traditions, corporate collaborative culture and ESG performance: Experiences from China
Wang, L., & Chen, X. (2025) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2025.108585 · Cited by 4
Twitchett, D. C., & Mote, F. W. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.002 · Cited by 4
(2001) · Religious Studies Review · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0922.2001.tb00367.x · Cited by 3
Ma, N. (2017) · Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies · doi:10.1353/jem.2017.0009 · Cited by 3
Cliché-ridden Online Danmei Fiction? A Case Study of Tianguan ci fu
Wang, A. (2022) · Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia · doi:10.60018/acasva.iray5065 · Cited by 3
“The extant ideal of san jiao he yi can be attested during the Tang (618–907 ce) dynasty (Brook 1993, Gong and Gong 2010), based on integration of indigenous Confucianism and Daoism with Buddhism that is of foreign origin (Fan and Whitehead 2011, Shahar 2013).”
Yang, J. J., Akroyd, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-06-2024-2507 · Cited by 2
Syncretism of Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism in Liaozhai Zhiyi in Terms of Filial Piety
Wang, A. (2021) · Heritage of Nusantara International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage · doi:10.31291/hn.v10i2.595 · Cited by 2
“As a national faith of China, the construct of 三教合一 sānjiàohéyī ‘the unity of Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism’ initially occurred before the Tang dynasty (Brook 1993, Gong and Gong 2010), based on the integration among and condominium of Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism that is of foreign…”
BackgroundIsomorphism, syncretism, and poly-ontological dynamics
Palmer, D. A. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003036555-11 · Cited by 2
Buddhist Apologetics in East Asia
Kaplan, U. (2019) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004407886 · Cited by 2
Sekularismit: Uskonnon ja maallisen rajankäyntejä
Kallinen, T., & Laitila, T. (2025) · doi:10.21435/tl.295 · Cited by 2
Chen, G. Z. (2019) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/zp73-z975 · Cited by 2
Westem Language Publications on Religions in China, 1990-1994
Kardos, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Chinese Religions · doi:10.1179/073776998805306859 · Cited by 1
Disability Theology Despite Itself
Chen, L. (2020) · Journal of Disability & Religion · doi:10.1080/23312521.2020.1750531 · Cited by 1
Zhang, D. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14040498 · Cited by 1
(2018) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004315716_010 · Cited by 1
Ownby, D. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Five Great Families and Telepathy: Folk Religion and Buddhism in Neo-Dongbei Fiction by Zheng Zhi
Wang, A. (2022) · Al-Adyan Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama · doi:10.24042/ajsla.v16i2.9626 · Cited by 1
Dis-located Bodies: Dao and Deep Reality in Embodied Experience
Wong, A. T. (2016) · Intersections conference journal · doi:10.25071/1718-4657.36759 · Cited by 1
Lai, R. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197539033.013.7 · Cited by 1
Dialogical transcendence and secular nationalism in the Sinosphere
Duara, P. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139998222.007 · Cited by 1
Cultural Additivity: An OverviewPreprint
Vuong, Q., Ho, T. M., Ho, M., Nguyen, M., & Nguyen, H. T. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/vp7ge
From “Superstition” to “People’s Customs”
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-001
Confucianesimo e Sciamanesimo nel medio periodo Koryŏ: dinamiche di uno scontro
Campa, M. (2023) · RAPHISA REVISTA DE ANTROPOLOGÍA Y FILOSOFÍA DE LO SAGRADO · doi:10.24310/raphisa.7.2.2023.17633
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.002.0006
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.003.0001
Twitchett, D. C., & Mote, F. W. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.018
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-011
Cultural Additivity: An OverviewPreprint
Vuong, Q., Ho, T. M., Ho, M., Nguyen, M., & Nguyen, H. T. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/an4qx
Genre Conflation and Fictional Religiosity inGuilian meng(Returning to the Lotus Dream)
Li, M. (2019) · Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture · doi:10.1215/23290048-8041944
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-007
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-004
The Life and Times of Li Hongzhi in China, 1952–1995
Ownby, D. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.003.0004
The Wenzhou Model of Rural Development in China
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-002
Latent canon, living ritual: moral possibilities and textual presence in the Cijiao
Soh, C. M. E. (2026) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2026.2667124
(1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.019
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-012
Broadening and Pluralizing the Modern Category of “Civil Society”
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-009
Ownby, D. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.003.0002
The Creation and Evolution of Qigong
Ownby, D. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.003.0003
Ownby, D. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.003.0007
Sprouts of Religious Civil Society
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-006
The Rule of Law and the Place of Rights
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.003.0006
(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.005.0002
Thapa, S. (2017) · Encyclopedia of Indian religions · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0852-2_367
(2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478009245-013
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.003.0003
The Meritocratic House and the Dignity of Legislation
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.003.0005
Twitchett, D. C., & Mote, F. W. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243339.001
Virtue, Dignity, and Constitutional Democracy
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.003.0002
Ownby, D. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.003.0005
(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.002.0001
(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.001.0001.002.003
The Modern Endeavor to Interpret Early Chinese Religions
Brashier, K. E. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935420.013.34
Judicial Review and Constitutional Dialogue
Kim, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630617.003.0007
Casey, N. (2003)
Metadata
- Authors
- Brook, T.
- Corresponding author
- Brook, Timothy
- Venue
- Journal of Chinese Religions
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-44
- ISSN
- 0737-769X (ISSN-L)
- 2050-8999
- OpenAlex
- W2052983465
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Chinese Religions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- syncretism, Three Teachings, Confucianism, Daoism, Buddhism, late imperial China, religious integration, Chinese religious history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
