CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityEconomic Theory and Institutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptualizing Future Labour Markets

Open access
Fleetwood, Steve·2014·Journal of Critical Realism
DOI 10.1179/1476743014z.00000000029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An enquiry into what future labour markets might look like is, necessarily, an enquiry into what future labour market institutions might look like. Any such enquiry requires a conceptual apparatus (i.e. theory, metatheory, and model) capable of dealing with labour markets and institutions. The conceptual apparatus of orthodox labour economics is incapable of this. An alternative conceptual apparatus, the ‘socio-economics of labour markets’, augmented with critical realist metatheory, is capable of dealing with future labour markets. This claim is demonstrated via the example of future labour markets based on Basic Income.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/1476743014z.00000000029

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Archer, M. 1995.Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  2. Archer, M. 1998. ‘Realism and Morphogenesis’. InCritical Realism: Essential Readings, eds M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, and A. Norrie, 356–81. London: Routledge.
  3. Boeri, T. and J. van OursJ. 2008.The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Bosworth, D., P. Dawkins, and T. Stromback, 1996.The Economics of The Labor Market. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
  5. Dore, R. 2000. ‘Dignity and Deprivation’. InWhat's Wrong With A Free Lunch?, ed. P. van Parijs, 80–84. Boston: Beacon Press.
  6. Ehrenberg, R. and R. Smith, 2009.Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. Boston: Addison Wesley.
  7. Elder-Vass, D. 2006. ‘The Theory of Emergence, Social Structure, and Human Agency’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Birkbeck College, London.
  8. Elder-Vass, D. 2010.The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  9. Fine, B. and D. Milonakis. 2009.From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics. London: Routledge. · DOI
  10. Fleetwood, S. 2014b, forthcoming. ‘Bhaskar and Critical Realism’. InThe Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents, eds P. Adler, P. Du Gay, G. Morgan, and M. Reed. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  11. Hartwig, M., ed. 2007.Dictionary of Critical Realism. Routledge: London.
  12. Jackson, W. 2009.Economics, Culture and Social Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. · DOI
  13. Lawson, T. 1997.Economics and Reality. London: Routledge. · DOI
  14. Lawson, T. 2003.Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge.
  15. McConnell, C., S. Brue, and D. Macpherson. 2006.Contemporary Labor Economics. Boston: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.
  16. Manning, A. 2003.Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  17. Offe, C. 2000. ‘Pathways from Here’. InWhat's Wrong With A Free Lunch?, ed. P. van Parijs, 111–18. Boston: Beacon Press.
  18. Saint-Paul, G. 2000.The Political Economy of Labor Market Institutions.Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  19. Samuelson, P. and W. Nordhaus. 1998.Economics, 16th edn. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  20. Smith, S. 2003.Labour Economics. London: Routledge. · DOI
  21. Staveren, Van, I. 2001.The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge.
  22. Thompson, G. 2003.Between Hierarchies and Markets: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  23. Wallace, M. and D. Brady. 2001. ‘The Next Long Swing’. InSourcebook of Labour Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes, eds I. Berg and I. A. Kalleberg, 101–34. New York: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  24. Wilson, N. 2007a. ‘The Labor Market for Early Musicians’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Kingston University.
  25. Wilson, N. 2007b. ‘Applying Critical Realism: Re-conceptualizing the Emergent English Early Music Performer Labour Market’. InContributions to Social Ontology, eds C. Lawson, J. Latsis, and N. Martins, 204–323. London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Fleetwood, S.
Affiliations
University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Fleetwood, Steve
Venue
Journal of Critical Realism
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
233-260
ISSN
  • 1476-7430 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-5138
DOI
10.1179/1476743014z.00000000029
OpenAlex
W2044457919
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Realism (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
labour market institutions, critical realism, metatheory, basic income, conceptual apparatus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review