Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Re-visiting the field: Collaborative archaeology as paradigm shift

McAnany, Patricia A., Rowe, Sarah M.·2015·Journal of Field Archaeology

Abstract

The emphasis of the JFA on field methods resonates strongly with current disciplinary interest in multivocality and participatory research. In this new epistemology of inclusiveness, communities play an active role in the production of archaeological knowledge as well as in the conservation of cultural heritage. From the perspective of archaeologists trained in the U.S. who conduct research in Latin America, we historicize changes in the triadic relationship among archaeologists, contemporary communities, and things of the past. This examination focuses on the evolving social context of archaeological practice. The social milieu within which archaeology is conducted is explored further by reference to a recent survey of archaeologists that elicited comments on grand challenges to archaeology. A few examples of the many forms that an engaged archaeology might take are offered from the Maya region. Although collaborative research poses challenges that emerge as communities entangled with archaeological practice become research partners, we suggest that the enhanced relevance that accompanies this transformation is well worth the effort.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/2042458215y.0000000007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indigenous peoples have successfully used this rights-based discourse to lobby for major shifts in power-sharing.

    “Indigenous peoples have successfully used this rights-based discourse to lobby for major shifts in power-sharing (McAnany & Rowe 2015: 4).”

    From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as McAnany & Rowe 2015: 4

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Atalay S., 2012, Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by and for Indigenous and Local Communities, 10.1525/9780520953468 · DOI
  2. Atalay S., 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects
  3. Bartu A., 2000, Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük
  4. Bartu A., 2007, Mediterranean Prehistoric Heritage: Training, Education and Management, 95
  5. 10.2307/278380 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/278774 · DOI
  7. Binford L., 1978, Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology
  8. 10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Clark, G. A., 2000, Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, 85
  10. Colwell-Chanthaphonh C., 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, 1
  11. Falzon M., 2009, Multi-Sited Ethnography Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research
  12. Freire P., 1972, Cultural Action for Freedom
  13. Gonzalez S. L., 2015, SAA Archaeological Record, 15, 11
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511817656.010 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96 · DOI
  17. Hodder I., 1982, Symbols in action
  18. Hodder I., 1999, The Archaeological Process. An introduction
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511814211 · DOI
  20. 10.1179/175355309X457196 · DOI
  21. Kintigh K. W., 2013, Grand Challenges for Archaeology – Crowd Sourcing Report
  22. 10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.5 · DOI
  23. Kuhn T., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  24. Liebmann M., 2008, Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique, 10.5771/9780759112353 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S0066154613000082 · DOI
  26. Marcus G. E., 1999, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, 10.7208/chicago/9780226229539.001.0001 · DOI
  27. McAnany P. A., 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects, 159
  28. 10.4018/ijagr.2015010101 · DOI
  29. McGhee R., 2008, American Antiquity, 73, 579, 10.1017/S0002731600047314 · DOI
  30. McGuire R. H., 2008, Archaeology as Political Action, 10.1525/9780520941588 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2307/280483 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/B978-012373962-9.00203-X · DOI
  33. North M. A., 2006, Protecting the Past for the Public Good: Archaeology and Australian Heritage Law
  34. Parks S., 2011, Anthropology News, 52, 27
  35. 10.1179/175355309X457204 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/001872677002300601 · DOI
  37. Silliman S., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology
  38. 10.2307/529307 · DOI
  39. Smith L. T., 1999, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
  40. 10.4324/9780203307991 · DOI
  41. Society for American Archaeology (SAA), 1996, American Antiquity, 61, 451, 10.1017/S0002731600053348 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20 · DOI
  43. 10.1017/CBO9780511813016 · DOI
  44. Wadsworth Y., 1998, Action Research International
  45. Watkins J., 2000, Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice
  46. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1011 · DOI
  47. 10.1525/aa.1990.92.3.02a00040 · DOI
  48. Wenger E., 2002, Cultivating Communities of Practice
  49. Whyte W. F., 1991, Participatory Action Research, 10.4135/9781412985383 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/279256 · DOI
  51. Wylie A., 2002, Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology, 10.1525/9780520935402 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McAnany, P. A., & Rowe, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Field Archaeology
Published
2015-08-06
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
499-507
ISSN
  • 0093-4690
  • 2042-4582
Cited by
55
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review