The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Re-visiting the field: Collaborative archaeology as paradigm shift
Abstract
The emphasis of the JFA on field methods resonates strongly with current disciplinary interest in multivocality and participatory research. In this new epistemology of inclusiveness, communities play an active role in the production of archaeological knowledge as well as in the conservation of cultural heritage. From the perspective of archaeologists trained in the U.S. who conduct research in Latin America, we historicize changes in the triadic relationship among archaeologists, contemporary communities, and things of the past. This examination focuses on the evolving social context of archaeological practice. The social milieu within which archaeology is conducted is explored further by reference to a recent survey of archaeologists that elicited comments on grand challenges to archaeology. A few examples of the many forms that an engaged archaeology might take are offered from the Maya region. Although collaborative research poses challenges that emerge as communities entangled with archaeological practice become research partners, we suggest that the enhanced relevance that accompanies this transformation is well worth the effort.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indigenous peoples have successfully used this rights-based discourse to lobby for major shifts in power-sharing.
“Indigenous peoples have successfully used this rights-based discourse to lobby for major shifts in power-sharing (McAnany & Rowe 2015: 4).”
From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as McAnany & Rowe 2015: 4
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Atalay S., 2012, Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by and for Indigenous and Local Communities, 10.1525/9780520953468 · DOI
- Atalay S., 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects
- Bartu A., 2000, Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük
- Bartu A., 2007, Mediterranean Prehistoric Heritage: Training, Education and Management, 95
- 10.2307/278380 · DOI
- 10.2307/278774 · DOI
- Binford L., 1978, Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology
- 10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Clark, G. A., 2000, Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, 85
- Colwell-Chanthaphonh C., 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, 1
- Falzon M., 2009, Multi-Sited Ethnography Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research
- Freire P., 1972, Cultural Action for Freedom
- Gonzalez S. L., 2015, SAA Archaeological Record, 15, 11
- 10.1017/CBO9780511817656.010 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5 · DOI
- 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96 · DOI
- Hodder I., 1982, Symbols in action
- Hodder I., 1999, The Archaeological Process. An introduction
- 10.1017/CBO9780511814211 · DOI
- 10.1179/175355309X457196 · DOI
- Kintigh K. W., 2013, Grand Challenges for Archaeology – Crowd Sourcing Report
- 10.7183/0002-7316.79.1.5 · DOI
- Kuhn T., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
- Liebmann M., 2008, Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique, 10.5771/9780759112353 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0066154613000082 · DOI
- Marcus G. E., 1999, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, 10.7208/chicago/9780226229539.001.0001 · DOI
- McAnany P. A., 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects, 159
- 10.4018/ijagr.2015010101 · DOI
- McGhee R., 2008, American Antiquity, 73, 579, 10.1017/S0002731600047314 · DOI
- McGuire R. H., 2008, Archaeology as Political Action, 10.1525/9780520941588 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/280483 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-012373962-9.00203-X · DOI
- North M. A., 2006, Protecting the Past for the Public Good: Archaeology and Australian Heritage Law
- Parks S., 2011, Anthropology News, 52, 27
- 10.1179/175355309X457204 · DOI
- 10.1177/001872677002300601 · DOI
- Silliman S., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology
- 10.2307/529307 · DOI
- Smith L. T., 1999, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
- 10.4324/9780203307991 · DOI
- Society for American Archaeology (SAA), 1996, American Antiquity, 61, 451, 10.1017/S0002731600053348 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511813016 · DOI
- Wadsworth Y., 1998, Action Research International
- Watkins J., 2000, Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1011 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1990.92.3.02a00040 · DOI
- Wenger E., 2002, Cultivating Communities of Practice
- Whyte W. F., 1991, Participatory Action Research, 10.4135/9781412985383 · DOI
- 10.2307/279256 · DOI
- Wylie A., 2002, Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology, 10.1525/9780520935402 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities
Colwell, C. (2016) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937 · Cited by 178
The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration
Montgomery, L. M., & Fryer, T. C. (2023) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2023.98 · Cited by 27
Defining Measures in Community-Based Archaeology in Suriname
White, C. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00620-9 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- McAnany, P. A., & Rowe, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 499-507
- ISSN
- 0093-4690
- 2042-4582
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review