Cited by 57Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentShoulder Injury and Treatment

Regional interdependence and manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine

Open access
McDevitt, Amy, Young, Jodi, Mintken, Paul, Cleland, Josh·2015·Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Abstract

Thoracic spine manipulation is commonly used by physical therapists for the management of patients with upper quarter pain syndromes. The theoretical construct for using thoracic manipulation for upper quarter conditions is a mainstay of a regional interdependence (RI) approach. The RI concept is likely much more complex and is perhaps driven by a neurophysiological response including those related to peripheral, spinal cord and supraspinal mechanisms. Recent evidence suggests that thoracic spine manipulation results in neurophysiological changes, which may lead to improved pain and outcomes in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. The intent of this narrative review is to describe the research supporting the RI concept and its application to the treatment of individuals with neck and/or shoulder pain. Treatment utilizing both thrust and non-thrust thoracic manipulation has been shown to result in improvements in pain, range of motion and disability in patients with upper quarter conditions. Research has yet to determine optimal dosage, techniques or patient populations to which the RI approach should be applied; however, emerging evidence supporting a neurophysiological effect for thoracic spine manipulation may negate the need to fully answer this question. Certainly, there is a need for further research examining both the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of manual therapy interventions utilized in the RI model as well as the neurophysiological effects resulting fr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/2042618615y.0000000005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDevitt, A., Young, J., Mintken, P., & Cleland, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Franklin Pierce University (US)
Corresponding author
McDevitt, Amy
Venue
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
Published
2015-03-27
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 1066-9817 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6186
OpenAlex
W2008058736
Cited by
57
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Keywords
regional interdependence, thoracic spine manipulation, manual therapy, neck pain, shoulder pain, neurophysiological mechanisms, thrust manipulation, range of motion, disability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review