Cited by 1,197Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study

Picavet, H. S.J., Schouten, J. S.A.G.·2003·Pain

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to present estimates on the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain of five different anatomical areas and ten anatomical sites, and their consequences and risk groups in the general Dutch population. Cross-sectional data from a population-based study of a sex-age stratified sample of Dutch inhabitants of 25 years and older were used. With a postal questionnaire data was assessed on musculoskeletal pain, additional pain characteristics (location, duration, course), its consequences (utilization of health care, sick leave and limitation in daily life) and general socio-demographic characteristics. The top three of self-reported musculoskeletal pain (point prevalence (P(p)) with 95% confidence interval (CI)) was: (1). low back pain, P(p)=26.9% (95% CI 25.5-28.3); (2). shoulder pain, P(p)=20.9% (95% CI 19.6-22.2); and (3). neck pain, P(p)=20.6% (95% CI 19.3-21.9). In most cases the pain was described as continuous or recurrent and mild. In every three out of ten cases the complaints about pain were accompanied by limitations in daily living. Between 33 and 42% of those with complaints consulted their general practitioner about their pain. With the exception of persons who are work disabled, general sociodemographic characteristics cannot be used to identify high risk groups. Musculoskeletal pain is common in all subgroups of the population and has far-reaching consequences for health, work and the use of health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Picavet, H. S. J., & Schouten, J. S. A. G.
Affiliations
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Corresponding author
Picavet, H. S.J.
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-03
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
167-178
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083094538
Cited by
1,197
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 67
FWCI
27.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
musculoskeletal pain, prevalence, low back pain, shoulder pain, neck pain, health care utilization, sick leave, functional limitations, risk groups, sociodemographic factors, Dutch population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Demography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Netherlands, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Class, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review