CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reconstructing Woodland Vegetation and its Exploitation by Past Societies, based on the Analysis and Interpretation of Archaeological Wood Charcoal Macro-Remains

Asouti, Eleni, Austin, Phil·2005·Environmental Archaeology
DOI 10.1179/env.2005.10.1.1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper the significance of the analysis of archaeological wood charcoal macro-remains as a tool for the reconstruction of woodland vegetation and its exploitation is discussed. Drawing from both older and more recent publications a number of theoretical and methodological approaches are examined. It is suggested that greater integration of charcoal and archaeological data is needed when evaluating charcoal preservation and sample composition, and that a more coherent theory of the complex ecological and cultural processes affecting species availability and firewood management needs to be developed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/env.2005.10.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. Asouti E, 2001, Charcoal Analysis from Çatalhöyük and Pntarbast, Two Neolithic Sites in the Konya Plain, South-Central Anatolia, Turkey
  2. 10.1017/S0003598X0009253X · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0305-4403(03)00015-3 · DOI
  4. Asouti, E. in press. Woodland vegetation, and the exploita-tion of fuel and timber at Neolithic çatalhöyük: report on the wood charcoal macro-remains, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Inhabiting Catalhliyilk. Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons (çatalhöyük Research Project 4, McDonald Institute Monograph). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archae-ological Research and British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
  5. 10.1007/PL00013369 · DOI
  6. Austin P, 2000, Plants in Neolithic Britain and Beyond, 63, 10.2307/j.ctvh1dtbb.11 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827098 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/978-94-011-2362-4_7 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2602-9_5 · DOI
  10. van Beek W. E. A., 1992, Bush Base: Forest Farm, 57
  11. Ben Salem B., 1981, Unasylva, 33, 13
  12. 10.2307/279653 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Binford L. R, 1983, In Pursuit of the Past
  14. 10.2307/3888977 · DOI
  15. Chabal L, 1988, Wood and Archaeology: Acts of the European Symposium held at Louvain-la-Neuve, October 1987, 189
  16. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827101 · DOI
  17. Chabal L, 1997, Forêts et Sociétés en Languedoc (Néolithique Final, Antiquité Tardive), L' Anthracologie, Méthode et Paléoécologie, 10.4000/books.editionsmsh.43380 · DOI
  18. Chabal L., 1999, La Botanique, 43
  19. Chapman G. W, 1948, Unasylva, 2, 251
  20. Couvert M, 1968, Libyca, 16, 249
  21. Cribb R. L. D, 1991, Ethnoarchaeological Approaches to Mobile Campsites: Hunter-Gatherer and Pastoralist Case Studies, 371
  22. David N., 2000, Ethnoarchaeology in Action
  23. 10.1007/BF00889696 · DOI
  24. Devres Inc, 1980, The Socio-Economic Context of Fuelwood Use in Small Rural Communities
  25. Ertuğ-Yaras F, 1997, An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Subsistence and Plant Gathering in Central Anatolia
  26. Evans J, 1999, Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Methods
  27. 10.1007/s003340200005 · DOI
  28. Fairbairn A., Inhabiting Catalhilwilk. Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons (catalhoyilk Research Project 4, McDonald Institute Monograph)
  29. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827099 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00195-4 · DOI
  31. Fleuret P., 1978, Journal of Develop-ing Areas, 12, 315
  32. Ford R. I, 1979, Advances in Archae-ological Method and Theory 2, 285
  33. 10.2307/2256222 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0034-6667(98)00050-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1006/qres.1998.1978 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/2844241 · DOI
  37. Hillman G. C, 2000, Village on the, 49
  38. Hodder I, 1996, On the Surface: çatalhöyük 1993–1995
  39. Horne L, 1982, Desertification and Development: Dryland Ecology in Social Perspective, 201
  40. Home L, 1994, Village Spaces: Settlement and Society in Northwestern Iran
  41. 10.1007/BF02859554 · DOI
  42. Johannessen S., 1990, Journal of Ethnobiology, 10, 61
  43. Keepax C. A, 1988, Charcoal Analysis with Particular Reference to Archaeological Sites in Britain
  44. 10.1007/978-94-011-2362-4_6 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827115 · DOI
  46. LaMotta V. M., 1999, The Archaeology of Household Activities, 19
  47. Lopinot N. H, 1984, Archaeobotanical Formation Processes and Late Middle Archaic Human-Plant Interrelationships in the Midcontinental U.S.A
  48. Martin M, 1980, Expedition, 22, 24
  49. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827103 · DOI
  50. Mellaart J, 1967, catal Hüyük, a Neolithic Town in Anatolia
  51. Michael Arnold J. E, 1997, Farms, Trees and Farmers, 3
  52. Miller N. F, 1985, Journal of Ethnobiology, 5, 1
  53. 10.1016/B978-0-12-424250-0.50010-5 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827118 · DOI
  55. Ntinou M, 2002, La Paleovegetación en el Norte de Grecia desde el Tardiglaciar hasta el Aticintico: Formaciones Vege-tales, Recursos y LIsos, 10.30861/9781841713083 · DOI
  56. 10.2307/281061 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2602-9_4 · DOI
  58. Pearsall D. M, 1983, Journal of Ethnobiology, 3, 121
  59. 10.1007/PL00006933 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/978-94-011-2362-4_1 · DOI
  61. Piqué R., 2002, Charcoal Analysis: Methodological Approaches, Palaeoecological Results and Wood Uses, 1
  62. Popper V. S, 1988, Current Paleoethnobotany, 53
  63. 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90005-6 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/978-94-011-2362-4_12 · DOI
  65. Rival L, 1998, The Social Life of Trees: Anthropological Perspectives on Tree Symbolism
  66. Roberts N., 1996, On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–1995, 19
  67. Rossen J., 1985, Journal of Field Archaeology, 12, 445
  68. Russell N., Inhabiting Çatalhöyük. Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons
  69. 10.2307/2256232 · DOI
  70. 10.1006/jasc.2000.0577 · DOI
  71. Scheel-Ybert R, 2002, Charcoal Analysis: Methodological Approaches, Palaeo-ecological Results and Wood Uses, 9
  72. Scherr S. H, 1997, Farms, Trees and Farmers, 141
  73. 10.1016/0305-4403(92)90033-Y · DOI
  74. Shackley M, 1981, Environmental Archaeology
  75. 10.1007/BF02862151 · DOI
  76. Schoch W, 1986, Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology, 619
  77. Scholtz A, 1986, Palynological and Palaeobotanical Studies in the Southern Cape
  78. Smart T. L., 1988, Current Paleo-ethnobotany, 165
  79. 10.1007/BF02907335 · DOI
  80. Tengberg M, 2002, Charcoal Analysis: Methodological Approaches, Palaeoeco logical Results and Wood Uses, 151
  81. Théry I, 2002, Charcoal Analysis: Methodological Approaches, Palaeoecological Results and Wood Uses, 243
  82. Thompson, G. B. 1994. Wood charcoals from tropical sites: a contribution to methodology and interpretation, pp. 9-33 in Hather, J. G. (ed.),Tropical Archaeobotany. London: Routledge.
  83. Townsend C. C, 1980, Flora of Iraq: Cornaceae to Rubiaceae
  84. Tusenius M. L, 1986, The Study of Charcoal from some Southern African Archaeological Contexts
  85. Tusenius M. L, 1989, South African Archae-ological Society Series, 6, 77
  86. 10.2307/2845530 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/0305-4403(82)90024-3 · DOI
  88. Watkins T, 1996, On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-1995, 47
  89. Watson P. J, 1979, Archaeological Ethnography in Western Iran
  90. 10.1179/lev.1971.3.1.31 · DOI
  91. 10.2307/3642603 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/S0277-3791(98)00106-1 · DOI
  93. Woldring H., 2001, Turkish Journal of Botany, 25, 1
  94. Zalucha L. A, 1982, Methodology in Paleoethnobotany: A Study in Vegetational Reconstruction Dealing with the Mill Creek Culture of Northwestern Iowa

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Asouti, E., & Austin, P.
Venue
Environmental Archaeology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-04
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1461-4103
  • 1749-6314
DOI
10.1179/env.2005.10.1.1
Cited by
338
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review