Cited by 37Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthReproductive tract infections research

Should Lactobacillus sporogenes and Bacillus coagulans Have a future?

Drago, L., De Vecchi, E.·2009·Journal of Chemotherapy

Abstract

Probiotics are gaining increasing scientific and commercial interest as functional foods. Their success has led to the development and marketing of a broad range of products based on probiotics. In this context, resolution of the taxonomy of microbial species remains a key point, since different species belonging to the same genus may have different beneficial properties. Lactobacillus sporogenes, which should be correctly classified as Bacillus coagulans, represents the archetypal misidentified probiotic and its inclusion among probiotics has often been a matter of debate. Since this bacterium shows characteristics of both genera Lactobacillus and Bacillus, its taxonomic position between the families lactobacillaceae and bacillaceae has often been discussed.This review summarizes the salient probiotic features of L. sporogenes /B. coagulans by examining currently available information. Although the use of L. sporogenes spores as a probiotic has increased in recent years, clinical evidence of its benefits are limited to only a few studies involving small patient populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/joc.2009.21.4.371

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Products failing to specify strain-level identity prevent clinicians and consumers from making informed choices and raise concerns over misidentification-related safety issues, particularly in vulnerable populations.

    “Products failing to specify strain-level identity prevent clinicians and consumers from making informed choices and raise concerns over misidentification-related safety issues, particularly in vulnerable populations.27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drago, L., & De Vecchi, E.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Journal of Chemotherapy
Published
2009-08
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
371-377
ISSN
  • 1120-009X (ISSN-L)
  • 1973-9478
OpenAlex
W1972369701
Cited by
37
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
Bacillus coagulans, probiotics, bacterial taxonomy, spore-forming bacteria, functional foods, Lactobacillaceae, Bacillaceae
MeSH terms
Bacillus, Bacteriocins, Digestive System, Humans, Lactobacillus, Probiotics, Food, Organic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review