CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Linguistics and language evolutionLinguistics and Language StudiesLinguistic Variation and Morphology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Place-Names and Dialects: Algonquian

Open access
Kenny, Hamill·1976·Names
DOI 10.1179/nam.1976.24.2.86
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To characterise maternal demographics, obstetric risk factors and neonatal outcomes associated with term category 1 caesarean sections (CS).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/nam.1976.24.2.86

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kenny, H.
Corresponding author
Kenny, Hamill
Venue
Names
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Published
1976-06-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
86-100
ISSN
  • 0027-7738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2279
DOI
10.1179/nam.1976.24.2.86
OpenAlex
W2020956632
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Names (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
place names, dialects, Algonquian languages, toponymy, language variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review