Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A QUESTION OF TIME: JUAN DE BETANZOS AND THE NARRATIVE OF THE INCAS

Rowe, John H., Julien, Catherine·2008·Ñawpa Pacha

Abstract

Betanzo’s narrative, as a translation of Inca accounts, provides excellent evidence for the Incas’ recording of linear time. In contrast to the Spaniards, the Incas were interested in specifying the passage of time recounting important deeds. These time spans can be added up and the totals used to verify certain historical episodes recorded by the chroniclers and also to compare sources. Moreover, we can use these data to establish the ages of some important people and the calendar dates of certain significant events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/naw.2008.29.1.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Aranibar Carlos, 1967, IntroducciOn

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rowe, J. H., & Julien, C.
Venue
Ñawpa Pacha
Published
2008-06
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
155-162
ISSN
  • 0077-6297
  • 2051-6207
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review