CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Archaeology and Cultural HeritageLatin American history and cultureHistorical and Architectural Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The late imperial site of Inca-Caranqui, northern highland Ecuador: at the end of empire

Bray, Tamara L., Almeida, José Echeverría·2014·Ñawpa Pacha
DOI 10.1179/0077629714z.00000000020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article reports on recent investigations at the late imperial site of Inca-Caranqui located at the northernmost edge of Tawantinsuyu. The interdisciplinary research conducted at this site since 2008 has been aimed at exploring the role of imperial architecture as a material strategy of Inca statecraft and the extent to which such strategies may have evolved as a function of time and distance from the imperial capital of Cuzco. Investigations at the site have involved the use of a variety of methodological techniques as well as controlled excavations and ethnohistoric research. An overview of the ethnohistoric context of the site together with some of the preliminary results of our fieldwork are presented in this article.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/0077629714z.00000000020

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Adamska Anna, 1996, Andes: Boletín de la Misión Arqueológica Andina, 1, 35
  2. Aguilar Gerónimo de, 1965, Relaciones geográficas de Indias, 2, 245
  3. Athens, J. Stephen 1978Evolutionary process in complex societies and the Late Period-Cara occupation of northern highland Ecuador. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico.
  4. Athens J. Stephen, 1980, El proceso evolutivo en las sociedades complejas y la ocupación del Período Tardío Cara en los Andes Septentrionales del Ecuador
  5. Atienza Lope de, 1931, La religión del imperio de los Incas
  6. Bedoya Maruri Ángel, 1979, Boletín Histórico, 9, 152
  7. Borchart de Moreno Christiana, 2007, El corregimiento de Otavalo: territorio, población y producción textil (1535–1808)
  8. Borja Antonio, 1965, Relaciones geográficas de Indias, 2, 248
  9. Cabello Balboa Miguel, 1951, Miscelánea antártica
  10. Caillavet Chantal, 1981, Cultura: Revista del Banco Central, 11, 109
  11. Caillavet Chantal, 1985, Revista Andina, 3, 403
  12. Cieza de León Pedro, 1995, Crónica del Perú, primera parte
  13. Connell Sam, 2006, Informe preliminar del proyecto arqueológico Pambamarca, 2006 y 2007, 88
  14. Cruz Marco, 2011, Bitácora Ecuador Magazine, 19, 20
  15. Echeverría José, 1995, Área septentrional Andina norte: arqueología y etnohistoria, 45
  16. Espinosa Waldemar, 1983, Los Caranquis y los Cayambes: siglos XV-XVI y el testimonio de la etnohistoria
  17. González Ana Lucia, 2009, Preliminary report for the Pambamarca archaeology project 2006 and 2007
  18. Jijón y Caamaño Jacinto, 1914, Contribución al conocimiento de los aborígenes de la provincia de Imbabura en la republica del Ecuador
  19. Jijón y Caamaño Jacinto, 1920, Boletín de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Estudios Históricos Americanos, 4, 1
  20. Krull, Amy 2014 Smashed: ceremonial intoxicants and intentional tool destruction. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  21. Kunter Kari, 1981, Cochasquí: estudios arqueológicos, 171
  22. Landázuri Cristóbal, 1990, Quitumbe, 7, 11
  23. Larrain Horacio, 1980, Demografía y asentamientos indígenas en la sierra norte del Ecuador en el siglo XVI
  24. Meyers Albert, 1981, Cochasquí: estudios arqueológicos, 219
  25. Minc Leah, 2015, Avances en la arqueometría cerámica en Latinoamérica
  26. Montesinos Fernando, 1957, Revista del Museo e Instituto Arqueológico, 16, 1
  27. Moreno Segundo, 2007, Historia antiguo del pais Imbaya
  28. Oberem Udo, 1969, Amerikanistenkongr, 1, 317
  29. Oberem Udo, 1981, Cochasquí: estudios arqueológicos
  30. Pazmiño Estanislao, 2009, Informe final del proyecto arqueológico Huataviro
  31. Tobar A., Oswaldo, 1998, Prospección sistemática en el sector este de la calle La Huaca, Caranqui, Imbabura
  32. Tobar Subía Cristóbal, 1985, Monografía de Ibarra

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bray, T. L., & Almeida, J. E.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Ñawpa Pacha
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-11-13
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
177-199
ISSN
  • 0077-6297 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-6207
DOI
10.1179/0077629714z.00000000020
OpenAlex
W2090798794
Cited by
8
References
30
Citations by year
2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ñawpa Pacha (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Geographic Society
  • Wayne State University
  • Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
  • Institut National Du Cancer
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Historical and Architectural Studies
Keywords
imperial architecture, Inca Empire, Cusco, ethnohistory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review