CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The wharf-borer Nacerdes melanura L., a threat to stored archaeological timbers

Pitman, A. J., Jones, A. M., Jones, E. B. Gareth·1993·Studies in Conservation
DOI 10.1179/sic.1993.38.4.274
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A survey of stored waterlogged archaeological timbers from the Mary Rose revealed that 2% of these timbers were infested by larvae of the wharf-borer beetle, Nacerdes melanura L. Timber species attacked included oak, poplar and pine, with moisture contents ranging between 130 and 670%. In addition, scanning electron microscope studies demonstrated that wood tunnelled by the larvae was microbially decayed. The larvae and their life-cycle were studied and emerging adults were observed penetrating the 500 gauge polyethylene used to wrap timbers. Studies showed that 60 Nylon/100I Surlyn, 70 Nylon/125I Surlyn, T 1–19v, T 1–25x and Camvac were more suitable wrapping materials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/sic.1993.38.4.274

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. SJOSTROM E., 1981, Wood Chemistry Fundamentals and Applications
  2. NILSSON T., 1990, Archaeological Wood Properties, Chemistry and Preservation, 67
  3. JONES A. M., 1991, Proceedings of the 4th ICOM Group on Wet Organic Archaeological Materials Conference, 25
  4. DAWSON J. E., 1982, ICOM Waterlogged Wood Working Group Conference, 227
  5. BLANCHETTE R. A., 1990, Archaeological Wood Properties, Chemistry and Preservation, 141
  6. MOUZOURAS, R. ‘Microbiological aspects of stored timbers from theMary Roseand the decay of wood by marine fungi’, PhD thesis, C.N.A.A., Portsmouth Polytechnic (1987).
  7. BUCK F. D., 1954, Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, 9
  8. 10.5962/bhl.title.28093 · DOI
  9. BALSBAUGH E. U., 1979, Coleopterists Bulletin, 33, 455, 10.5962/p.371773 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/03036758.1975.10421850 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/aesa/52.3.299 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/aesa/51.3.222 · DOI
  13. THEOBOLD, in LAING, F., 1936, The Entomologist’s Monthly Magathze, 72, 41
  14. 10.4039/Ent691-1 · DOI
  15. PINNIGER D. B., 1990, Insect Pests in Museums
  16. FISHER R. C., 1940, Annals. Applied Biology, 27, 548
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1929.tb01409.x · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF00403133 · DOI
  19. GEYER H., 1982, International Journal of Wood Preservation, 2, 2
  20. FISHER R.C., 1936, The Entomologists Monthly Magazine, 72, 41
  21. HICKIN N. E., 1975, The Insect Factor In Wood Decay, 32
  22. SCHWEINGRUBER S. H., 1978, Microscopic Wood Anatomy
  23. HOFFMAN P., 1990, Archaeological Wood Properties, Chemistry and Preservation, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pitman, A. J., Jones, A. M., & Jones, E. B. G.
Venue
Studies in Conservation
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1993-11
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
274-284
ISSN
  • 0039-3630
  • 2047-0584
DOI
10.1179/sic.1993.38.4.274
Cited by
8
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review