The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iron oxide catalysts: Fenton and Fentonlike reactions – a review
Abstract
Iron is the fourth most common element by mass in the Earth's crust and forms compounds in several oxidation states. Iron (hydr)oxides, some of which form inherently and exclusively in the nanometre-size range, are ubiquitous in nature and readily synthesized. These facts add up to render many Fe (hydr)oxides suitable as catalysts, and it is hardly surprising that numerous studies on the applications of Fe (hydr)oxides in catalysis have been published. Moreover, the abundant availability of a natural Fe source from rocks and soils at minimal cost makes the potential use of these as heterogeneous catalyst attractive. Besides those Fe (hydr)oxides that are inherently nanocrystalline (ferrihydrite, Fe 5 HO 8.4H 2 O, and feroxyhyte, δ’-FeOOH), magnetite (Fe 3 O 4) is often used as a catalyst because it has a permanent magnetization and contains Fe in both the divalent and trivalent states. Hematite, goethite and lepidocrocite have also been used as catalysts in their pure forms, doped with other cations, and as composites with carbon, alumina and zeolites among others. In this review we report on the use of synthetic and natural Fe (hydr)oxides as catalysts in environmental remediation procedures using an advanced oxidation process, more specifically the Fenton-like system, which is highly efficient in generating reactive species such as hydroxyl radicals, even at room temperature and under atmospheric pressure. The catalytic efficiency of Fe (hydr)oxides is strongly affected by factors such as the Fe oxidation state, surface area, isomorphic substitution of Fe by other cations, pH and temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LXXIII.—Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron
Fenton, H. J. H. (1894) · J. Chem. Soc., Trans. · doi:10.1039/ct8946500899 · Cited by 3,179
The Fenton Reaction. Dependence of the Rate on pH
Kremer, M. L. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp020654p · Cited by 197
Cited by
Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes
Bokare, A. D., & Choi, W. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.054 · Cited by 2,368
Environmental Implications of Hydroxyl Radicals (•OH)
Gligorovski, S., Strekowski, R., Barbati, S., & Vione, D. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500310b · Cited by 1,623
Heterogeneous Fenton catalysts: A review of recent advances
Thomas, N., Dionysiou, D. D., & Pillai, S. C. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124082 · Cited by 889
Interfacial mechanisms of heterogeneous Fenton reactions catalyzed by iron-based materials: A review
He, J., Yang, X., Men, B., & Wang, D. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.003 · Cited by 587
Luo, H., Zeng, Y., He, D., & Pan, X. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127191 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, M. C., Oliveira, L. C. A., & Murad, E.
- Venue
- Clay Minerals
- Publisher
- Mineralogical Society
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-302
- ISSN
- 0009-8558 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8030
- OpenAlex
- W2137754418
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iron oxide catalysts: Fenton and Fentonlike reactions – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1180/claymin.2012.047.3.01
- The paper
- Pereira, M. C., Oliveira, L. C. A., & Murad, E. (2012). Iron oxide catalysts: Fenton and Fentonlike reactions – a review. Clay Minerals. https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2012.047.3.01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.