The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent prognostic factors for AML outcome
Abstract
Over the last three decades there have been dramatic advances in deciphering the cytogenetic and molecular lesions underlying the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These have not only afforded greater insights into disease biology, but also provided useful information predicting the likelihood of any given patient achieving and maintaining remission following conventional chemotherapy, leading to the development of risk-stratified treatment approaches. However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that AML is highly heterogeneous at the molecular level. Defining the individual genetic abnormalities or combinations of markers that provide significant independent prognostic information and establishing their respective relationships to other pre-treatment characteristics that impact on outcome, such as age and presenting white blood cell count, presents a major ongoing challenge. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that risk of relapse and overall survival can be predicted by assessment of kinetics and depth of response following front-line therapy and monitoring of the leukemic burden using molecular or immunological approaches to minimal residual disease (MRD) detection. These advances present the exciting prospect that panels of pre-treatment parameters affording independent prognostic information can be integrated with precise measurement of treatment response using MRD technologies to provide greater refinement in risk-adapted management of AML. This could lead to further improvements in outcome and serve to identify in a more reliable fashion those patients most likely to benefit from allogeneic transplant in first remission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome
Mardis, E. R., Ding, L., Dooling, D. J., Larson, D. E., McLellan, M. D., Chen, K., Koboldt, D. C., Fulton, R. S., Delehaunty, K. D., McGrath, S. D., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0903840 · Cited by 2,219
Cytoplasmic Nucleophosmin in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia with a Normal Karyotype
Falini, B., Mecucci, C., Tiacci, E., Alcalay, M., Rosati, R., Pasqualucci, L., La Starza, R., Diverio, D., Colombo, E., Santucci, A., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041974 · Cited by 1,892
Mutation in TET2 in Myeloid Cancers
Delhommeau, F., Dupont, S., Valle, V. D., James, C., Trannoy, S., Massé, A., Kosmider, O., Le Couedic, J.-P., Robert, F., Alberdi, A., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810069 · Cited by 1,776
Mutations and Treatment Outcome in Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Schlenk, R. F., Döhner, K., Krauter, J., Fröhling, S., Corbacioglu, A., Bullinger, L., Habdank, M., Späth, D., Morgan, M., Benner, A., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa074306 · Cited by 1,628
Cited by
Garcia, T. B., Fosmire, S. P., & Porter, C. C. (2018) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2017.11.004 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimwade, D., & Hills, R. K.
- Venue
- Hematology
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 2009
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 385-395
- ISSN
- 1520-4383 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4391
- OpenAlex
- W2135003681
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Independent prognostic factors for AML outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.385
- The paper
- Grimwade, D., & Hills, R. K. (2009). Independent prognostic factors for AML outcome. Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.