The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NOD/SCID/γcnull mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells
Abstract
To establish a more appropriate animal recipient for xenotransplantation, NOD/SCID/γcnull mice double homozygous for the severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mutation and interleukin-2Rγ (IL-2Rγ) allelic mutation (γcnull) were generated by 8 backcross matings of C57BL/6J-γcnull mice and NOD/Shi-scidmice. When human CD34+ cells from umbilical cord blood were transplanted into this strain, the engraftment rate in the peripheral circulation, spleen, and bone marrow were significantly higher than that in NOD/Shi-scid mice treated with anti-asialo GM1 antibody or in the β2-microglobulin–deficient NOD/LtSz-scid (NOD/SCID/β2mnull) mice, which were as completely defective in NK cell activity as NOD/SCID/γcnull mice. The same high engraftment rate of human mature cells was observed in ascites when peripheral blood mononuclear cells were intraperitoneally transferred. In addition to the high engraftment rate, multilineage cell differentiation was also observed. Further, even 1 × 102 CD34+ cells could grow and differentiate in this strain. These results suggest that NOD/SCID/γcnull mice were superior animal recipients for xenotransplantation and were especially valuable for human stem cell assay. To elucidate the mechanisms involved in the superior engraftment rate in NOD/SCID/γcnull mice, cytokine production of spleen cells stimulated with Listeria monocytogenesantigens was compared among these 3 strains of mice. The interferon-γ production from dendritic cells from the NOD/SCID/γcnull mouse spleen was significantly suppressed in comparison with findings in 2 other strains of mice. It is suggested that multiple immunological dysfunctions, including cytokine production capability, in addition to functional incompetence of T, B, and NK cells, may lead to the high engraftment levels of xenograft in NOD/SCID/γcnull mice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wilson, A., Laurenti, E., Oser, G., van der Wath, R. C., Blanco-Bose, W., Jaworski, M., Offner, S., Dunant, C. F., Eshkind, L., Bockamp, E., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.048 · Cited by 1,908
Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9–mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids
Matano, M., Date, S., Shimokawa, M., Takano, A., Fujii, M., Ohta, Y., Watanabe, T., Kanai, T., & Sato, T. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3802 · Cited by 1,135
Hematopoiesis: a human perspective
Doulatov, S., Notta, F., Laurenti, E., & Dick, J. E. (2012) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.006 · Cited by 895
Fujii, M., Shimokawa, M., Date, S., Takano, A., Matano, M., Nanki, K., Ohta, Y., Toshimitsu, K., Nakazato, Y., Kawasaki, K., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.003 · Cited by 852
Visualization and targeting of LGR5+ human colon cancer stem cells
Shimokawa, M., Ohta, Y., Nishikori, S., Matano, M., Takano, A., Fujii, M., Date, S., Sugimoto, S., Kanai, T., & Sato, T. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22081 · Cited by 728
Metadata
- Authors
- Ito, M., Hiramatsu, H., Kobayashi, K., Suzue, K., Kawahata, M., Hioki, K., Ueyama, Y., Koyanagi, Y., Sugamura, K., Tsuji, K., Heike, T., & Nakahata, T.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3175-3182
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2137906256
- Cited by
- 1,476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NOD/SCID/γcnull mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2001-12-0207
- The paper
- Ito, M., Hiramatsu, H., Kobayashi, K., Suzue, K., Kawahata, M., Hioki, K., Ueyama, Y., Koyanagi, Y., Sugamura, K., Tsuji, K., Heike, T., & Nakahata, T. (2002). NOD/SCID/γcnull mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2001-12-0207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.