Cited by 100Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchNeutropenia and Cancer Infections

Rapid infusion rituximab in combination with corticosteroid-containing chemotherapy or as maintenance therapy is well tolerated and can safely be delivered in the community setting

Sehn, Laurie H., Donaldson, Jane, Filewich, Allison, Fitzgerald, Catherine, Gill, Karamjit K., Runzer, Nancy, Searle, Barb, Souliere, Sheila +3 more·2007·Blood

Abstract

The increasing usage of rituximab in the management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has created huge logistical challenges with respect to the delivery of this time- and labor-intensive drug. To address these challenges, we developed and tested the feasibility of a 90-minute infusion schedule for rituximab (20% of the dose administered in the first 30 minutes, remaining 80% administered over 60 minutes). A safety analysis performed in 150 patients receiving rituximab with corticosteroid-containing chemotherapy and 56 patients receiving rituximab as maintenance therapy demonstrated that this schedule was well tolerated, with no grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions observed. In addition, no increase in minor reactions was noted. More than 1200 patients have been treated with this rapid rituximab infusion schedule in the province of British Columbia (BC), demonstrating its safety in the community setting. The adoption of this 90-minute schedule as standard practice has had a positive impact on resource utilization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2006-11-059469

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasing use of rituximab in the treatment of hematological malignancies in both induction and maintenance settings has placed a major burden on infusion services, resulting in long waiting times for eligible patients.

    “The increasing use of the mAb rituximab in the treatment of hematological malignancies in both induction and maintenance settings has placed a major burden on infusion services, resulting in long waiting times for eligible patients [49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sehn, L. H., Donaldson, J., Filewich, A., Fitzgerald, C., Gill, K. K., Runzer, N., Searle, B., Souliere, S., Spinelli, J. J., Sutherland, J., & Connors, J. M.
Affiliations
BC Cancer Agency (CA)
Venue
Blood
Published
2007-01-23
Volume
109
Issue
10
Pages
4171-4173
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2094502152
Cited by
100
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
BC Cancer Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Keywords
rituximab, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, maintenance therapy, infusion reactions, drug safety, community pharmacy, resource utilization (health care)
MeSH terms
Rituximab, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Feasibility Studies, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Infusion Pumps, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review