The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Umbilical cord blood transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: impact on transplantation outcomes in 110 adults with hematologic disease
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the efficacy of umbilical cord blood (UCB) in the setting of a nonmyeloablative regimen consisting of fludarabine (200 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg), and a single fraction of total body irradiation (200 cGy) with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for posttransplantation immunoprophylaxis. The target cell dose for the UCB graft was 3.0 × 107 nucleated cells/kg, resulting in the selection of a second partially human leukocyte antigen-matched UCB unit in 85%. One hundred ten patients with hematologic disease were enrolled. Neutrophil recovery was achieved in 92% at a median of 12 days. Incidences of grades III and IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 22% and 23%, respectively. Transplantation-related mortality was 26% at 3 years. Survival and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years were 45% and 38%, respectively. Favorable risk factors for survival were absence of high-risk clinical features (Karnofsky 50-60, serious organ dysfunction, recent fungal infection, P < .01) and absence of severe GVHD (P = .04), and favorable risk factors for EFS were absence of high-risk clinical features (P < .01) and use of 2 UCB units (P = .07). These findings support the use of UCB after a nonmyeloablative conditioning as a strategy for extending the availability of transplantation therapy, particularly for older patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sorror, M. L., Maris, M. B., Storb, R., Baron, F., Sandmaier, B. M., Maloney, D. G., & Storer, B. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-05-2004 · Cited by 2,969
Cited by
Brunstein, C. G., Miller, J. S., Cao, Q., McKenna, D. H., Hippen, K. L., Curtsinger, J., DeFor, T., Levine, B. L., June, C. H., Rubinstein, P., et al. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-07-293795 · Cited by 1,045
Self-citationDelaney, C., Heimfeld, S., Brashem-Stein, C., Voorhies, H., Manger, R. L., & Bernstein, I. D. (2010) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2080 · Cited by 771
Eapen, M., Rocha, V., Sanz, G., Scaradavou, A., Zhang, M.-J., Arcese, W., Sirvent, A., Champlin, R. E., Chao, N., Gee, A. P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70127-3 · Cited by 586
Self-citationBone Marrow Transplantation for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Wagner, J. E., Ishida-Yamamoto, A., McGrath, J. A., Hordinsky, M., Keene, D. R., Woodley, D. T., Chen, M., Riddle, M. J., Osborn, M. J., Lund, T., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0910501 · Cited by 374
Self-citationAcute graft-versus-host disease
Malard, F., Holler, E., Sandmaier, B. M., Huang, H., & Mohty, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00438-1 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunstein, C. G., Barker, J. N., Weisdorf, D. J., DeFor, T. E., Miller, J. S., Blazar, B. R., McGlave, P. B., & Wagner, J. E.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2007-10-15
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3064-3070
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2099847697
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Umbilical cord blood transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: impact on transplantation outcomes in 110 adults with hematologic disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2007-04-067215
- The paper
- Brunstein, C. G., Barker, J. N., Weisdorf, D. J., DeFor, T. E., Miller, J. S., Blazar, B. R., McGlave, P. B., & Wagner, J. E. (2007). Umbilical cord blood transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: impact on transplantation outcomes in 110 adults with hematologic disease. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-04-067215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
