The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Historical review: megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis
Open accessAbstract
The study of thrombopoiesis has evolved greatly since an era when platelets were termed “the dust of the blood,” only about 100 years ago. During this time megakaryocytes were identified as the origin of blood platelets; marrow-derived megakaryocytic progenitor cells were functionally defined and then purified; and the primary regulator of the process, thrombopoietin, was cloned and characterized and therapeutic thrombopoietic agents developed. During this journey we continue to learn that the physiologic mechanisms that drive proplatelet formation can be recapitulated in cell-free systems and their biochemistry evaluated; the molecular underpinnings of endomitosis are being increasingly understood; the intracellular signals sent by engagement of a large number of megakaryocyte surface receptors have been defined; and many of the transcription factors that drive megakaryocytic fate determination have been identified and experimentally manipulated. While some of these biologic processes mimic those seen in other cell types, megakaryocytes and platelets possess enough unique developmental features that we are virtually assured that continued study of thrombopoiesis will yield innumerable clinical and scientific insights for many decades to come.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages
Akashi, K., Traver, D., Miyamoto, T., & Weissman, I. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35004599 · Cited by 2,617
Pevny, L., Simon, M. C., Robertson, E., Klein, W. H., Tsai, S.-F., D'Agati, V., Orkin, S. H., & Costantini, F. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349257a0 · Cited by 1,308
Interleukin-6 stimulates thrombopoiesis through thrombopoietin: role in inflammatory thrombocytosis
Kaser, A., Brandacher, G., Steurer, W., Kaser, S., Offner, F. A., Zoller, H., Theurl, I., Widder, W., Molnar, C., Ludwiczek, O., et al. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v98.9.2720 · Cited by 667
Cited by
Romania, P., Lulli, V., Pelosi, E., Biffoni, M., Peschle, C., & Marziali, G. (2008) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07382.x · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaushansky, K.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 981-986
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2019806947
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical review: megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2007-05-088500
- The paper
- Kaushansky, K. (2008). Historical review: megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-05-088500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.