The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
Open accessAbstract
We previously reported the feasibility of clofarabine and cytarabine combinations in AML. Questions remain as to (1) the therapeutic advantage of this combination and (2) the role of lower doses of clofarabine and cytarabine in older patients. We have conducted an adaptively randomized study of lower-dose clofarabine with or without low-dose cytarabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged 60 years and older. Patients received 30 mg/m2 clofarabine intravenously daily for 5 days with or without 20 mg/m2 cytarabine subcutaneously daily for 14 days as induction. Consolidation consisted of 3 days of clofarabine with or without 7 days of cytarabine. Seventy patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-83 years). Sixteen patients received clofarabine and 54 the combination. Overall, 56% achieved complete remission (CR). CR rate was significantly higher with the combination (63% vs 31%; P = .025). Induction mortality was 19% with the combination versus 31% with clofarabine alone (P = .276). The combination showed better event-free survival (7.1 months vs 1.7 months; P = .04), but not overall survival (11.4 months vs 5.8 months; P = .1). Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine has a higher response rate than clofarabine alone with comparable toxicity. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00088218.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burnett, A. K., Milligan, D., Prentice, A. G., Goldstone, A. H., McMullin, M. F., Hills, R. K., & Wheatley, K. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22496 · Cited by 619
Cited by
‘Acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2016 update’
De Kouchkovsky, I., & Abdul-Hay, M. (2016) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2016.50 · Cited by 1,317
Fenaux, P., Mufti, G. J., Hellström-Lindberg, E., Santini, V., Gattermann, N., Germing, U., Sanz, G., List, A. F., Gore, S., Seymour, J. F., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.8329 · Cited by 961
Blum, W., Garzon, R., Klisovic, R. B., Schwind, S., Walker, A., Geyer, S., Liu, S., Havelange, V., Becker, H., Schaaf, L., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002650107 · Cited by 450
Survival for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a population-based study
Oran, B., & Weisdorf, D. J. (2012) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2012.066100 · Cited by 423
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Tallman, M. S., Wang, E. S., Altman, J. K., Appelbaum, F. R., Bhatt, V. R., Bixby, D., Coutre, S. E., De Lima, M., Fathi, A. T., Fiorella, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0028 · Cited by 419
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Faderl, S., Ravandi, F., Huang, X., Garcia-Manero, G., Ferrajoli, A., Estrov, Z., Borthakur, G., Verstovsek, S., Thomas, D. A., Kwari, M., & Kantarjian, H. M.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1638-1645
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1965658643
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2007-11-124602
- The paper
- Faderl, S., Ravandi, F., Huang, X., Garcia-Manero, G., Ferrajoli, A., Estrov, Z., Borthakur, G., Verstovsek, S., Thomas, D. A., Kwari, M., & Kantarjian, H. M. (2008). A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-124602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.